Statistical Size Effect in Quasi‐Brittle Structures: II. Nonlocal Theory
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 117, Issue 11
Abstract
The failure probability of structures must be calculated from the stress field that exists just before failure, rather than the initial elastic field. Accordingly, fracture‐mechanics stress solutions are utilized to obtain the failure probabilities. This leads to an amalgamated theory that combines the size effect due to fracture energy release with the effect of random variability of strength having Weibull distribution. For the singular stress field of linear elastic fracture mechanics, the failure‐probability integral diverges. Convergent solution, however, can be obtained with the nonlocal‐continuum concept. This leads to nonlocal statistical theory of size effect. According to this theory, the asymptotic size‐effect law for very small structure sizes agrees with the classical‐power law based on Weibull theory. For very large structures, the asymptotic size‐effect law coincides with that of linear elastic fracture mechanics of bodies with similar cracks, and the failure probability is dominated by the stress field in the fracture‐process zone while the stresses in the rest of the structure are almost irrelevant. The size‐effect predictions agree reasonably well with the existing test data. The failure probability can be approximately calculated by applying the failure‐probability integral to spatially averaged stresses obtained, according to the nonlocal‐continuum concept, from the singular stress field of linear elastic fracture mechanics. More realistic is the use of the stress field obtained by nonlinear finite element analysis according to the nonlocal‐damage concept.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bažant, Z. P. (1988a). “Stable states and stable paths of propagation of damage zones and interactive fractures.” France‐U.S. Workshop on “Strain Localization and Size Effect Due to Cracks and Damage,” J. Mazars and Z. P. Bažant, eds., Elsevier, London, U.K., 183–207.
2.
Bažant, Z. P. (1988b). “Stable states and paths of structures with plasticity or damage.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(12), 2013–2034.
3.
Bažant, Z. P., Xi, Y., and Reid, S. G. (1991). “Statistical size effect in quasi‐brittle structures: I. Is Weibull theory applicable?” J. Engrg. Mech., 117(11), 2623–2640.
4.
Bažant, Z. P., and Cao, Z. (1987). “Size effect in punching shear failure of slabs.” ACI Struct. J., 84(1), 44–53.
5.
Bažant, Z. P., and Gettu, R., and Kazemi, M. T. (1989). “Identification of nonlinear fracture properties from size effect tests and structural analysis based on geometry‐dependent R‐curves.” Report No. 89‐3/498p, Ctr. for Advanced Cement‐Based Materials, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Ill;
also Int. J. Rock Mech. and Mining Sci., 28(1) (1991), 43–51.
6.
Bažant, Z. P., and Lin, F. B. (1988a). “Nonlocal smeared cracking model for concrete fracture.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(11), 2493–2510.
7.
Bažant, Z. P., and Lin, F. B. (1988b). “Nonlocal yield limit degradation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 26, 1805–1823.
8.
Bažant, Z. P., and Ožbolt, J. (1990). “Nonlocal microplane model for fracture, damage, and size effect in structures.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(11), 2485–2505.
9.
Bažant, Z. P., Pfeiffer, P. A. (1987). “Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number.” ACI Mater. J., 84(6), 463–480.
10.
Bažant, Z. P., and Pijaudier‐Cabot, G. (1989). “Measurement of characteristic length of nonlocal continuum.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 115(4), 755–767.
11.
Bažant, Z. P., and Pijaudier‐Cabot, G. (1988). “Nonlocal continuum damage localization instability and convergence.” J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME, 55, 287–293.
12.
Bažant, Z. P., and Cedolin, L. (1991). “Stability of structures: Elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories.” Oxford Univ. Press, N.Y.
13.
Bruckner, A., and Munz, D. (1984). “Scatter of fracture toughness in the brittleductile transition region of a ferritic steel.” Advances in Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics, C.(Raj) Sundararajan, ed., Vol. 92, ASME, New York, N.Y., 105–111.
14.
Chudnovsky, A., and Kunin, B. (1987). “A probabilistic model of brittle cack formation.” J. Appl. Phys., 62(10), 4124–4129.
15.
Eringen, A. C. (1965). “Theory of micropoler continuum.” Proc. 9th Midwestern Mechnics Conf., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, 23–40.
16.
Eringen, A. C. (1966). “A unified theory of thermomechanical materials.” Int. J. Engrg. Sci., 4, 179–202.
17.
Eringen, A. C. (1972). “Linear theory of nonlocal elasticity and dispersion of plane waves.” Int. J. Engrg. Sci., 10(5), 425–435.
18.
Gettu, R., and Bažant, Z. P., and Karr, M. G. (1990). “Fracture properties and brittleness of high strength concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 87, 608–618.
19.
Kröner, E. (1967). “Elasticity theory of materials with long‐range cohesive forces.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 3(5), 731–742.
20.
Westergaard, H. M. (1939). “Bearing pressures and cracks.” J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME, 6, 49–53.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1991
Published in print: Nov 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.