Stability of Laminated Elastomeric Bearings
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116, Issue 6
Abstract
Steel‐laminated elastomeric bearings are widely used in bridges. In order to impose the smallest possible force on the substructure, the bearing should have the smallest plan dimensions and the greatest height possible. Both are controlled by stability. However, buckling of the bearing differs significantly from that of a conventional column in that it is strongly influenced by shear flexibility and axial deformations. Existing theories ignore the latter and become very conservative for bearings with the relatively low profiles typically used today. Extensions to the theory were developed to account for the influence of axial shortening as well, and experiments were conducted. The general form of the modified theory matches the pattern of the test results, and in particular they both show that bearings with a height‐to‐width ratio below a certain limit will never buckle. Perfect correlation could not be achieved because of difficulties in establishing reliable flexural stiffnesses for the bearings. Design equations are proposed based on the form of the theoretical equations, calibrated against the test results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Buckle, I. G., and Kelly, J. M. (1986). “Properties of slender elastomeric isolation bearings during shake table studies of a large‐scale model bridge deck.” Publication SP‐94, Am. Concr. Inst., Detroit, Mich., 247–269.
2.
Code for the use of rubber bearings for rail bridges, 772R. (1973). Int. Union of Railways, VII, Ways and Works, Committee 7, Brussels, Belgium.
3.
Conversy, F. (1967). “Appareils d'appui en caoutchouc fretté.” Annates des Ponts et Chaussées, VI, Paris, France (in French).
4.
Gent, A. N. (1964). “Elastic stability of rubber compression springs.” J. Mech. Engrg. Sci., 6(4), 318–326.
5.
Gent, A. N., and Lindley, P. B. (1959). “The compression of bonded rubber blocks.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., 173(3), 111–222.
6.
Gent, A. N., and Meinecke, E. A. (1970). “Compression, bending and shear of 1369 bonded rubber blocks.” Polymer Engrg. and Sci., 10(1), 48–53.
7.
Haringx, J. A. (1948). “On highly compressive helical springs and rubber rods, and their application for vibration‐free mountings.” Phillips Res. Reports, Parts I–III, N. V. Phillips Gloeilampenfabrieken, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
8.
Herrmann, L. R., Hamidi, R., and Shafigh‐Nobari, E. (1985). “Nonlinear behavior of elastomeric bridge bearings.” Report to California DOT, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of California at Davis, Calif.
9.
Kelly, J. M. (1982). “Aseismic base isolation: Its history and prospects.” Publication SP‐70, Am. Concr. Inst., Detroit, Mich., 549–586.
10.
Kosten, C. W. (1942). “Over de elastische eigenschappen van gevulcaniseerde rubber. (On the elastic properties of vulcanized rubber),” thesis presented to Delft University, Delft, Netherlands, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in Dutch).
11.
Lindley, P. B. (1982). “Natural rubber structural bearings.” Publication SP‐70, Am. Concr. Inst., Detroit, Mich., 353–378.
12.
Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F., and Taylor, A. W. (1987). “Performance of elastomeric bearings.” Report No. 298, Nat. Cooperative Highway Res. Program, Washington, D.C.
13.
Schapery, R. A., and Skala, D. P. (1976). “Elastic stability of laminated elastomeric columns.” Int. J. of Solids and Structs., 12(6), 401–417.
14.
Scroggins, G. C. (1986). “Stability of elastomeric bearings,” thesis presented to the University of Washington, in Seattle, Wash., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering.
15.
Simo, J. C., and Kelly, J. M. (1984). “Finite element analysis of the stability of multilayer elastomeric bearings.” Engrg. Structs., 6, July, 162–174.
16.
Southwell, R. V. (1932). “On the analysis of experimental observations in problems of elastic stability.” Proc. Royal Soc., Series A, 135, London, U.K., 601–616.
17.
Standard specifications for highway bridges. (1989). 14th Ed., Am. Association of State Highway and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
18.
Stanton, J. F., and Roeder, C. W. (1982). “Elastomeric bearings, design, construction and materials.” Report No. 248, Nat. Cooperative Highway Res. Program, Washington, D.C.
19.
Steel, concrete and composite bridges: Section 9.1 code of practice for design of bridge bearings. (1983). Document No. BS5400, British Standards Inst., London, U.K.
20.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Gere, J. M. (1961). Theory of elastic stability. 2nd Ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
21.
Trahair, N. S. (1969). “Deformations of geometrically imperfect beams.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 95(7), 1475–1496.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116 • Issue 6 • June 1990
Pages: 1351 - 1371
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1990
Published in print: Jun 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.