Structural Damping Estimation for Long‐Span Bridges
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116, Issue 11
Abstract
Existing analysis techniques for the prediction of response of long‐span bridges to wind and earthquake loads are generally based on a modal synthesis in which the structure is assumed to respond in one or several independent modes. In such analyses, damping generally cannot be estimated with the same approaches as those used for the mass and stiffness, and it is usually added to the modal equations after decomposition as a “known” percentage of critical damping. In the case of bridges, in particular, the total damping, of which part is mechanical or structural, is influenced substantially by the presence of a wind flow around the structure. The total damping is the sum of the mechanical and this aerodynamic damping. This paper presents the results of a study that attempts to separate and estimate the mechanical and aerodynamic damping of a prototype bridge structure using full‐scale ambient vibration and wind measurements, finite element analyses of the bridge structure, and a wind tunnel model of the bridge deck section. The values obtained are compared with those traditionally used in design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdel‐Ghaffar, A. M., and Housner, G. W. (1977). “An analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a suspension bridge by ambient vibration measurements.” EERL 77‐01, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.
2.
Abdel‐Ghaffar, A. M., and Scanlan, R. H. (1985). “Ambient vibration studies of Golden Gate Bridge. I: Suspended structure.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 111(4), 463–482.
3.
Bampton, M. C. C., et al. (1986). “Deer Isle‐Sedgwick Suspension Bridge wind and motion analysis.” Report #FHWA/RD‐86/183, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
4.
Bosch, H. R. (1987). “A wind tunnel investigation of the Deer Isle‐Sedgwick Bridge (Phase I).” Report #FHWA/RD‐87/027, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
5.
Davenport, A. G. (1961). “The spectrum of horizontal gustiness near the ground in high winds,” Quart. J. Royal Met. Soc., 87, 194–211.
6.
Huston, D. R. (1986). “The effects of upstream gusting on the aeroelastic behavior of long‐span bridges,” thesis presented to Princeton University, at Princeton, N.J., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
7.
Kumarasena, T., Scanlan, R. H., and Morris, G. R. (1987). “Finite element analysis of the Deer Isle Bridge for the natural frequencies and mode shapes.” Report #1987‐10‐01, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
8.
Mason, A. H., and Carder, D. S. (1967). “Vibration frequencies of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 93(2), 237–245.
9.
McLamore, V. L., Hart, G. C., andStubbs, I. R. (1971). “Ambient vibration of two suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 97(10), 2567–2582.
10.
McMichael, J. M., and Klebanoff, P. S. (1975). “The dynamic response of helicoids anemometers.” NBSIR 75‐772, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
11.
Okamoto, S., and Kubo, K. (1957). “Measurements of the damping coefficient of suspension bridges.” Monthly J. Inst. Indust. Sci., U. of Tokyo, 9(12), 516–520 (in Japanese).
12.
Scanlan, R. H. (1978a). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. I: Flutter theory.” J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 187–199.
13.
Scanlan, R. H. (1978b). “The action of flexible bridges under wind: II. Buffeting theory.” J. Sound Vib., 60(2), 201–211.
14.
Scanlan, R. H., and Jones N. P. (1989). “A minimum design methodology for evaluating bridge flutter and buffeting response.” Proc., 6th U.S. Nat. Conf. Wind Engrg., Houston, Tex., B9‐11–B9‐23.
15.
Scanlan, R. H., and Jones, N. P. (1990). “Aeroelastic analysis of cable stayed bridges.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 279–297.
16.
Scheffey, C. F. (1984). “Observations on the aerodynamic excitation of a suspension bridge—Section model tests and prototype behavior,” thesis presented to The George Washington University, at Washington, D.C., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
17.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H. (1986). Wind Effects on Structures. 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, N.Y.
18.
von Kármán, T. (1948). “Progress in the statistical theory of turbulence.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington, D.C., 530–539.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 116 • Issue 11 • November 1990
Pages: 2414 - 2433
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1990
Published in print: Nov 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.