Extending Monte Carlo Simulations to Represent and Propagate Uncertainties in Presence of Incomplete Knowledge: Application to the Transfer of a Radionuclide in the Environment
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 5
Abstract
This work is devoted to some recent developments in uncertainty analysis of environmental models in the presence of incomplete knowledge. The classical uncertainty methodology based on probabilistic modeling provides direct estimations of relevant statistical measures to quantify the uncertainty on the model responses thanks to a nice mixing between Monte Carlo simulations and the use of efficient statistical treatments. However, this approach may lead to unrealistic results when not enough information is available to specify the probability distribution functions (pdfs) of input parameters. For example, if a fixed (i.e., the pdf is a Dirac distribution) variable is unknown between and , the proper way to model this knowledge is to consider a set of distributions (a distribution means that the probability that the parameter is equal to is and elsewhere), belonging to . This is quite different from assume an equidistribution. Thus, to respect the real state of knowledge in industrial applications, a new modeling based on the theory of evidence is introduced. It allows an extension of classical Monte Carlo simulations by relaxing assumptions related to the choice of probability distribution functions and possible dependencies between uncertain parameters. To illustrate the principle of our modeling, a comparison with the probabilistic modeling is given in the case of the transfer of a radionuclide in the environment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Agrawal, G., Chameau, J., and Bourdeau, P. (1997). “Assessing the liquefaction susceptibility at a site based on information from penetration testing.” J. G. N. Kartam and I. Flood, eds., Artificial neural networks for civil engineers: Fundamentals and applications, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Bardossy, G., and Fodor, J. (2004). Evaluation of uncertainties and risks in geology: New mathematical approaches for their handling, Springer, Berlin.
Baudrit, C., and Dubois, D. (2005). “Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in risk assessment.” Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Elsevier, Pittsburgh, 31–40.
Baudrit, C., Dubois, D., and Guyonnet, D. (2006). “Joint propagation and exploitation of probabilistic and possibilistic information in risk assessment models.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(5), 593–608.
Baudrit, C., Guyonnet, D., and Dubois, D. (2005). “Postprocessing the hybrid method for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments.” J. Environ. Eng. 131(12), 1750–1754.
Bolle, A. (1988). “Approche probabiliste en mécanique des sols avec prise en compte de la variabilité spatiale.” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, France.
Chojnacki, E., Baccou, J., and Destercke, S. (2007). “Numerical sensitivity and efficiency in the treatment of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty.” Proc., SAMO Conf., Budapest, Hungary, 92–93.
Chojnacki, E., and Ounsy, A. (1996). “Description of the IPSN method for the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis and the associated software: SUNSET.” Proc., ASME/JSME, ICONE, 545–550.
Cochran, W. (1977). Sampling techniques, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Conover, W. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Dubois, D., Nguyen, H., and Prade, H. (2000). “Possibility theory, probability and fuzzy sets: Misunderstandings, bridges, and gaps.” Fundamentals of fuzzy sets, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 343–438.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1988). Possibility theory, Plenum, New York.
Ferson, S., Arlin, J., and Ginzburg, L. (1996). “Hybrid processing of stochastic and subjective uncertainty data.” Risk Anal. 16(6), 785–791.
Ferson, S., Ginzburg, L., and Akcakaya, R. (2004). “Whereof one cannot speak: When input distributions are unknown.” Risk Anal., ⟨http://www.ramas.com/whereof.pdf⟩.
Gentle, J. (1985). “Monte Carlo methods.” Encyclopedia of Statistics, Vol. 5, S. Kotz and N. J., eds, Wiley, New York, 612–617.
Guyonnet, D., Bourgine, B., Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Côme, B., and Chilès, J. (2003). “Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments.” J. Environ. Eng., 129(1), 68–78.
Helton, J., and Oberkampf, W. (2004). “Guest editorial.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 85(1-3), 1–10.
Iman, R., and Conover, W. (1982). “Free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables.” Technometrics, 3, 311–334.
Lecoutre, J., and Tassi, P. (1987). Statistique nonparamétrique et robustesse, Economica, Paris.
McKay, D., Beckman, R., and Conover, W. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
Mercat-Rommens, C., Chojnacki, E., Merle-Szeremeta, A., Brenot, J., and Sugier, A. (2002). “La nécessaire prise en compte des incertitudes dans les évaluations de risque: l’exemple du Groupe Radioécologie Nord-Cotentin (GRNC).” Environ. Health Risks, 1(5-6), 276–282.
Petruzzi, A., D’Auria, F., Micaeli, J.-C., DeCrecy, A., and Royen, J. (2004). “The BEMUSE programme (best-estimate methods—Uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation).” Proc., Int. Meeting on Best-Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installation Safety Analysis, ANS, Washington, D.C., 225–235.
Rosenblueth, E. (1975). “Point estimates for probability moments.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72(10), 3812–3814.
Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Wickett, T., et al. (1998). “Report of the uncertainty methods study for advanced best estimate thermal-hydraulic code applications.” OECD/CSNI Rep. NEA/CSNI R (97) 35, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
Zadeh, L. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control., 8, 338–353.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 4, 2007
Accepted: Sep 24, 2007
Published online: May 1, 2008
Published in print: May 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.