Impacts of Hydrophilic Membrane Additives on the Ultrafiltration of River Water
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 5
Abstract
One of the most serious disadvantages of membrane applications in water treatment is the decreasing water permeation rate with time, which is often called fouling. This study investigates surface modification of polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membranes as a fouling reduction strategy for drinking water treatment applications. Surface modification was achieved through the addition of three different tailor-made hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules (LSMM200, LSMM400, and LSMM600). Flat sheet membranes were prepared via a single-step casting procedure; their surface hydrophilicity was quantified via contact angle measurements. The incorporation of hydrophilic additives produced slightly more hydrophilic membranes (contact angle reduction of up to ) and improved membrane performance compared with the PES membrane without blending. In the treatment of highly colored river water, LSMM400- and LSMM600-modified membranes achieved up to 32% higher final fluxes. Surface modification resulted in significantly decreased flux reductions and natural organic matter accumulation. Dissolved organic carbon removals were approximately 70% for all the membranes studied. No clear correlation between membrane hydrophilicity and fouling reduction was observed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was conducted thanks to the financial support of Materials and Manufacturing Ontario (MMO). Thanks to Raluca Voicu of the Institute for Microstructural Sciences at the National Research Council of Canada for providing access to the contact angle analysis equipment and help in operating it. Sincere thanks to Dipak Rana of the Industrial Membrane Research Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Ottawa, for his cooperation in the LSMM synthesis.
References
Akthakul, A., McDonald, W. F., and Mayes, A. M. (2002). “Noncircular pores on the surface of asymmetric polymer membranes: Evidence of pore formation via spinodal demixing.” J. Membr. Sci., 208(1–2), 147–155.
Alsari, A. M., Khulbe, K. C., and Matsuura, T. (2001). “The effect of sodium dodecylsulfate solutions as gelation media on the formation of PES membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 188(2), 279–293.
Amy, G., et al. (2001). “NOM rejection by, and fouling of, NF and UF membranes” AWWARf Rep. No. 90837, American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver.
Carroll, T., Booker, N. A., and Meier-Haack, J. (2002). “Polyelectrolyte-grafted microfiltration membranes to control fouling by natural organic matter in drinking water.” J. Membr. Sci., 203(1–2), 3–13.
Chan, C. M. (1994). Polymer surface modification and characterization, Hanser, New York.
Fang, Y., Pham, V. A., Matsuura, T., Santerre, J. P., and Narbaitz, R. M. (1994). “Effect of surface-modifying macromolecules and solvent evaporation time on the performance of polyethersulfone membranes for the separation of chloroform/water mixtures by pervaporation.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 54(12), 1937–1943.
Hester, J. F., and Mayes, A. M. (2002). “Design and performance of foul-resistant poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes prepared in a single-step by surface segregation.” J. Membr. Sci., 202(1–2), 119–135.
Ho, J. Y., Matsuura, T., and Santerre, J. P. (2000). “The effect of fluorinated surface modifying macromolecules on the surface morphology of polyethersulfone membranes.” J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 11(10), 1085–1104.
Hong, S., and Elimelech, M. (1997). “Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 132(2), 159–181.
Jacangelo, J. G., Laine, J., Cummings, E. W., Deutschmann, A., Malleviale, J., and Wiesner, M. R. (1994). “AWWARf Rep. No. 90639, American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver.
Jucker, C., and Clark, M. (1994). “Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 97(1), 37–52.
Khayet, M., Suk, D. E., Narbatiz, R. M., Santerre, J. P., and Matsuura, T. (2003). “Study on surface modification by surface-modifying macromolecules and its applications in membrane separation processes.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 89(11), 2902–2916.
Mahmud, H., et al. (2001). “Evaluation of membranes containing surface modifying macromolecules: Determination of the chloroform separation from aqueous mixtures via pervaporation.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 79(1), 183–189.
Matsuura, T. (1994). Synthetic membranes and membrane separation processes, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Michaels, A. (1980), “Analysis and prediction of sieving curves for ultrafiltration membranes: A universal correlation.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 15(6), 1305–1322.
Mosqueda-Jimenez, D. (2003). “Impact of manufacturing conditions of Polyethersulfone membranes on final characteristics and fouling reduction.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Mosqueda-Jimenez, D. B., Narbaitz, R. M., and Matsuura, T. (2004a) “Impact of the membrane surface modification on the treatment of surface water.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(12), 1450–1459.
Mosqueda-Jimenez, D. B., Narbaitz, R. M., and Matsuura, T. (2004b). “Membrane fouling test: Apparatus evaluation.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(1), 90–99.
Mosqueda-Jimenez, D. B., Narbaitz, R. M., and Matsuura, T. (2006). “Effects of preparation conditions on the surface modification and performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 99(6), 2978–2988.
Mosqueda-Jimenez, D. B., Narbaitz, R. M., Matsuura, T., Chowdhury, G., Pleizier, G., and Santerre, J. P. (2004c). “Influence of processing conditions on the properties of ultrafiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 231(1–2), 209–224.
Mulder, M. (1996). Basic principles of membrane technology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Nilson, J. A., and DiGiano, F. A. (1996). “Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 88(5), 53–66.
Nguyen, H. A., Narbaitz, R., and Matsuura, T. (2005). “Impact of hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules (LSMMs) on PES ultrafiltration membrane hydrophilicity and performance.” Proc., 2005 Water Quality and Technology Conf., Quebec City, Canada, American Water Works Association (AWWA), Denver.
Rana, D., Matsuura, T., Narbaitz, R. M., and Feng, C. (2005). “Development and characterization of novel hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecule for polymeric membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 249(1–2), 103–112.
Singh, S., Khulbe, K., Matsuura, T., and Ramamurthy, P. (1998). “Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy.” J. Membr. Sci., 142(1), 111–127.
“Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.” (1995). APHA, AWWA, and WEF, Washington, D.C.
Thorsen, T. (1999) “Membrane filtration of humic substances—State of the art.” Water Sci. Technol., 40(9), 105–112.
Wavhal, D. S., and Fisher, E. R. (2002). “Hydrophilic modification of polyethersulfone membranes by low temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization.” J. Membr. Sci., 209(1), 255–269.
Zhang, W., Wahlgren, M., and Sivik, B. (1989). “Membrane characterization by the contact angle technique. II: Characterization of UF-membranes and comparison between the captive bubble and sessile drop as methods to obtain water contact angles.” Desalination, 72(3), 263–273.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 5 • May 2007
Pages: 515 - 522
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 5, 2005
Accepted: Sep 18, 2006
Published online: May 1, 2007
Published in print: May 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.