Models Quantify the Total Maximum Daily Load Process
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
Mathematical models have been used for many years to assist in the management of water quality. The total maximum daily load (TMDL) process is no exception; models represent the means by which the assimilative capacity of a water body can be quantified and a waste load allocation can be determined such that the assimilative capacity is not exceeded. Unfortunately, in many TMDLs, the use of models has not always adhered to the best modeling practices that have been developed over the past half-century. This paper presents what are felt to be the most important principles of good modeling practice relative to all of the steps in developing and applying a model for computing a TMDL. These steps include: Problem definition and setting management objectives; data synthesis for use in modeling; model selection; model calibration and, if possible confirmation; model application; iterative modeling; and model postaudit. Since mathematical modeling of aquatic systems is not an exact science, it is essential that these steps be fully transparent to all TMDL stakeholders through comprehensive documentation of the entire process, including specification of all inputs and assumptions. The overriding consideration is that data richness and quality govern the level of model complexity that can be applied to a given system. The model should never be more complex than the data allow. Also, in applying a model, one should always attempt to quantify the uncertainty in predictions. In general, quantifying uncertainty is easier with simple models, which is another reason to begin with a simple framework.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface water-quality modeling, McGraw-Hill, Companies, New York.
Chapra, S. C., and Reckhow, K. H. (1983). “Engineering approaches for lake management.” Mechanistic modeling, Vol. 2, Butterworth, Woburn, Mass.
Donigian, A. S., Jr., and Huber, W. C. (1991). “Modeling of nonpoint source water quality in urban and non-urban areas.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-91/039, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.
Fitzpatrick, J., Imhoff, J., Burgess, E., and Brashear, R. (2001). “Water quality models: A survey and assessment.” Final Rep. No. 99-WSM-5, Water Environment Research Foundation Project, Alexandria, Va.
General Accounting Office (GAO). (2000). “Water quality: Key EPA and state decisions limited by inconsistent and incomplete data.” Rep. No. RCED-00-54, GAO.
Limno-Tech, Incorporated. (1999). “Evaluation and recommendation of water quality models for the Ohio River.” Final Rep. prepared for ORSANCO/Ohio River Users Group, LTI, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Limno-Tech, Incorporated, FTN Associates, Limited, Ross and Associates Environmental Consulting, Limited, and Technology Planning and Management Corporation. (2003). “Navigating the TMDL process: Evaluation and improvements.” Final Rep. for Project No. 00-WSM-1, Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, Va.
National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NRC/NAS) (2001). Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management, National Academy Press, Washington D.C, 2001, (see 〈www.nap.edu/catalog/10146.html〉).
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K.(1994). “Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in earth sciences.”Science, 263, 641–645.
Reckhow, K. H., Beaulac, M. N., and Simpson, J. T. (1980). “Modelingphosphorus loading and lake response under uncertainty: A manual and compilation of export coefficients.” Rep. No. 440/5-80-011, U.S. EPA, Washington D.C.
Reckhow, K. H., and Chapra, S. C.(1983a). “Confirmation of water quality models.” Ecol. Modell., 20, 113–133.
Reckhow, K. H., and Chapra, S. C. (1983b). “Engineering approaches for lake management.” Data analysis and empirical modeling, Vol. 1, Butterworth, Woburn, Mass.
Schnoor, J. L., Sata, C., McKenchnie, D., and Sahoo, D. (1987). “Processes, coefficients, and models for simulating toxic organics and heavy metals in surface waters.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-87-015, U.S. EPA, Washington D.C.
Shoemaker, L., Lahlou, M., Bryer, M., Kumar, D., and Kratt, K. (1999). “Compendium of tools for watershed assessment and TMDL development.” Rep. No. EPA841-B-97-006, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, U.S. EPA, Washington D.C.
Thomann, R. V.(1982). “Verification of water quality models.” J. Environ. Eng. Div. (Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.), 108(5), 923–940.
Thomann, R. V., and Mueller, J. A. (1987). Principles of surface water quality modeling and control, Harper and Row, New York.
U.S. EPA. (1997). “Compendium of watershed-scale models for TMDL development.” Rep. No. EPA 841-B-97-006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2002). “The twenty needs report: How research can improve the TMDL program.” Rep. No. EPA 841-B-02-002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington D.C.
Water Environment Federation (WEF). (2001). TMDL Science Issues Conference Onsite Program, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Va., and Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators (ASIWPCA), Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 7, 2003
Accepted: May 14, 2003
Published online: May 14, 2004
Published in print: Jun 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.