TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 15, 2003

Membrane Fouling Test: Apparatus Evaluation

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 1

Abstract

Flux decline with time is one of the most serious shortcomings of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. It is highly desirable to have a membrane (fouling) testing procedure that is short in duration, utilizes a minimum amount of test solution, only requires a small membrane area, and is representative of the large-scale process. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the testing of a given membrane using a number of different test units (reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, dead-end, and cross-flow cells) and testing procedures. It was of particular interest to determine if smaller cells used in the literature perform similarly to the Sepa CF cell, as it is a standard. During six-day runs the flux decline of the polyethersulfone membrane tested was mainly caused by membrane compaction and much less due to fouling. As various membrane materials compact to a different extent, studies into the fouling characteristics of different types of membranes should incorporate precompaction and pure water testing to quantify the contribution of membrane compaction and true fouling to the overall flux decline. The dead-end cell performed very differently from continuous cells, so their use is not recommended. The six-day continuous flow tests showed that the reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), and cross-flow (CF) cells yielded very similar dissolved organic carbon removals and flux decline, despite UF and RO cells using membrane coupons eight times smaller than CF cells.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allgeier, S. C., and Summers, R. S.(1995). “Evaluating NF for DBP control with the RBSMT.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 87(3), 87–99.
Anselme, C., and Jacobs, E. P. (1996). “Ultrafiltration.” Water treatment membrane processes, J. Mallevialle, P. E. Odendaal, and M. R. Wiesner, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, 10.1–10.88.
Bodzek, M., and Konieczny, K.(1998). “Comparison of various membrane types and module configurations in the treatment of natural water by means of low-pressure membrane methods.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 14(1–3), 69–78.
Bonner, F. A., and O’Melia, C. R. (1991). “Some aspects of the fouling of UF membranes by natural organic matter in water treatment.” Proc., Membrane Technology Conf., American Water Works Association, Denver, 239–251.
Borneman, Z., Gökmen, V., and Nijhuis, H. H.(1997). “Selective removal of polyphenols and brown color in apple juices using PES/PVP membranes in a single-ultrafiltration process.” J. Membr. Sci., 134(2), 191–197.
Bouchard, C. R., Jolicoeur, J., and Kouadio, P.(1997). “Study of humic acid adsorption on nanofiltration membranes by contact angle measurements.” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 75(2), 339–345.
Box, G. E., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. (1978). “Statistics for experimenters.” Wiley, New York.
Brink, L. E. S., Elbers, S. J. G., Robbertesen, T., and Both, P.(1993). “The anti-fouling action of polymers preadsorbed on ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 76(2–3), 281–291.
Carrère, H.(2000). “Study of hydrodynamic parameters in the cross-flow filtration of guar gum pseudoplastic solutions.” J. Membr. Sci., 174(1), 135–145.
Cho, J., Amy, G., and Pellegrino, J.(1999a). “Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes.” Water Res., 33(11), 2517–2526.
Cho, J., Amy, G., and Pellegrino, J.(2000). “Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane.” J. Membr. Sci., 164(1–2), 89–110.
Cho, J., Amy, G., Pellegrino, J., and Yoon, Y. (1998). “Comparison of polyamide, polyethersulfone (PES), and sulfonated PES UF membranes: Flux decline, NOM rejection and NOM foulants.” Proc., Annual AWWA Conf., American Water Works Association, Denver, 73–86.
Cho, J., Amy, G., Pellegrino, J., and Yoon, Y.(1999b). “Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes and foulants characterization.” Water Supply, 17(1), 183–190.
DiGiano, F. A., Arweiler, S., and Riddick, J. A.(2000). “Alternative tests for evaluation NF fouling.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 92(2), 103–115.
Edzwald, J. K., Becker, W. C., and Wattier, K. L.(1985). “Surrogate parameters for monitoring organic matter and THM precursors.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc.,77(4), 122–132.
Hong, S., and Elimelech, M.(1997). “Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 132(2), 159–181.
Jacangelo, J. G., Laı⁁ne, J., Cummings, E. W., Deutschmann, A., Mallevialle, J., and Wiesner, M. R. (1994). “Evaluation of ultrafiltration membrane pretreatment and nanofiltration of surface waters.” American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver.
Jones, K., and O’Melia, C. R.(2001). “Ultrafiltration of protein and humic substances: Effect of solution chemistry on fouling and flux decline.” J. Membr. Sci., 193(2), 163–173.
Jönsson, A. S.(1995). “Concentration polarization and fouling during ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions and hydrophobic solutes.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 30(2), 301–312.
Jönsson, A. S., Lindau, J., Wimmerstedt, R., Brinck, J., and Jönsson, B.(1997). “Influence of the concentration of a low-molecular organic solute on the flux reduction of a polyethersulphone ultrafiltration membrane.” J. Membr. Sci., 135(1), 117–128.
Matsuura, T. (1994). “Synthetic membranes and membrane separation processes.” CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Nicolas, S., Balannec, B., Beline, F., and Bariou, B.(2000). “Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis of small non-charged molecules: A comparison study of rejection in a stirred and an unstirred batch cell.” J. Membr. Sci., 164(1–2), 141–154.
Nilson, J. A., and DiGiano, F. A.(1996). “Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 88(5), 53–66.
Persson, K. M., Gekas, V., and Trägårdh, G.(1995). “Study of membrane compaction and its influence on ultrafiltration water permeability.” J. Membr. Sci., 100(2), 155–162.
Peuravuori, J., and Pihlaja, K.(1997). “Isolation and characterization of natural organic matter from lake water: Comparison of isolation with solid adsorption and tangential membrane filtration.” Environ. Int., 23(4), 441–451.
Rudie, B., Condiff, R., and Kariniemi, P. (1990). “Influence of operating parameters on ultrafiltration membrane dextran rejection.” Int. Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes, European Membrane Society (EMS), Toulouse, France.
Rudie, B. J., Torgrimson, T. A., and Spatz, D. D. (1985). “Reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membrane compaction fouling studies using ultrafiltration pretreatment.” Reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration, S. Sourirajan and T. Matsuura, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
Singh, S., Khulbe, K. C., Matsuura, T., and Ramamurthy, P.(1998). “Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy.” J. Membr. Sci., 142(1), 111–127.
Sourirajan, S., and Matsuura, T. (1985). “Reverse osmosis/ultrafiltration process principles.” National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
“Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.” (1995). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.
Taylor, J. S., Thompson, D. M., and Carswell, J. K.(1987). “Applying membrane processes to groundwater sources for trihalomethane precursor control.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 79(8), 72–82.
Thorsen, T.(1999a). “Flux and recovery influences on treatment efficiency in ultrafiltration of coloured drinking water.” Water Supply, 17(1), 47–54.
Thorsen, T.(1999b). “Membrane filtration of humic substances—state of the art.” Water Sci. Technol., 40(9), 105–112.
Zeman, J. L., and Zydney. L. A. (1996). Microfiltration and ultrafiltration: Principles and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130Issue 1January 2004
Pages: 90 - 99

History

Received: Aug 8, 2002
Accepted: Jan 27, 2003
Published online: Dec 15, 2003
Published in print: Jan 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

D. B. Mosqueda-Jimenez
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa ON, Canada K1N 6N5.
R. M. Narbaitz
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa ON, Canada K1N 6N5.
T. Matsuura
Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, 161 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa ON, Canada K1N 6N5.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share