Evaluation of Leaching Tests for Cement Based Immobilization of Hazardous Compounds
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 7
Abstract
A range or arsenic containing compounds, including arsenic trioxide, pentoxide and a lead arsenate insecticide have been stabilized using formulations of cement alone, and sulfate and subsequently exposed to a range of leaching regimes in order to compare their effectiveness for metal stabilization. Leaching tests used were two regulatory tests, the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and the Australian Bottle Leaching Procedure (ABLP), as well as column leaching. Arsenic leachate concentrations from cement-stabilized lead arsenate insecticide were similar when subjected to either the TCLP or ABLP using the same leachant. Lead, known to be immobilized by means different to that of arsenic, yielded varying leachate concentrations when using either of the regulatory tests, even though the leachant was of the same type. The leaching of calcium influences the filtered arsenic leachate, whereas the leaching of lead is greatly affected by leachate pH. As expected, both regulatory tests generally proved to be very severe in terms of the masses of the hazardous constituents leached when compared to conceptually more realistic column leaching scenarios. Sodium arsenate-containing formulations behaved anomalously, with column leaching tests resulting in larger arsenic masses being leached than the regulatory tests. Sodium arsenate, known to inhibit cementation reactions, serves as a reminder of the perils that can be faced when generalizing the results obtained from leaching tests.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Australian Bureau of Meteorology. (2000). 〈http://www.bom.gov.au〉.
Conner, J. R. (1990). Chemical fixation and solidification of hazardous wastes, Van Nostrand–Reinhold, New York.
Cote, P., and Bridle, T., (1987). “Long term leaching scenarios for cement-based waste forms.” Waste Manage. Res., 5(1), 55–66.
Cote, P. L., and Constable, T. W., (1982). “Evaluation of experimental conditions in batch leaching procedures.” Resources Conservation, 9, 59–73.
Dutre, V., and Vandecasteele, C., (1996). “An evaluation of the solidification/stabilization of industrial arsenic containing waste using extraction and semi-dynamic leach tests.” Waste Management, 16, 625–631.
Dutre, V., and Vandecasteele, C., (1998). “Immobilization mechanism of arsenic in waste solidified using cement and lime.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2782–2787.
Dzombak, D. A., and Morel, F. M. M. (1990). Surface complexation modeling, Wiley–Interscience, New York.
Leist, M. (2001). “The fixation of arsenic wastes.” PhD thesis, Victoria Univ., Melbourne. Australia.
Leist, M., Casey, R. J., and Caridi, D. (2002). “The fixation and leaching of cement stabilized arsenic.” Waste Management, in press.
Standards Australia, (1997). “Wastes sediments and contaminated soils–Part 3: preparation of leachates–bottle leaching procedure.” Australian Standard 4439.3.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (1982). “Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP).” Method 1311, Cincinnati.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 1, 2001
Accepted: Jul 18, 2002
Published online: Jun 13, 2003
Published in print: Jul 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.