Evaluation of Solid Waste Management System Using Fuzzy Composition
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 6
Abstract
Evaluating the best alternative for a solid waste management system often requires decision makers to consider conflicting, vague, and uncertain information. Fuzzy set theory offers a possible means of managing these kinds of data or information. In this study, we propose a systematic approach to evaluating a solid waste management system in a fuzzy environment. The approach employs three main concepts: linguistic variables, fuzzy numbers, and an analytic hierarchy process. The linguistic variables are used to represent the degree of appropriateness of decision criteria, which are vague or uncertain. These linguistic variables are then translated into fuzzy numbers to reflect their uncertainties and aggregated into the final fuzzy decision value using a hierarchical structure. Through a case study, the approach is applied to the evaluation of a solid waste management system consisting of four different treatment alternatives. The results demonstrate that the developed approach can be a useful tool for evaluating a solid waste management system, where criteria are vague or imprecise.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alidi, A. S.(1996). “A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry.” Appl. Mathe. Modeling, 20(12), 925–933.
Boyle, C. A.(2000). “Solid waste management in New Zealand.” Waste Manage. Res., 20, 517–526.
Buckley, J. J.(1985). “Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 15, 21–31.
Chang, N. B., and Wang, S. F.(1996). “Solid waste management system analysis by multiobjective mixed integer programming model.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 48(1), 17–43.
Chung, S., and Poon, C.(1996). “Evaluating waste management alternatives by the multiple criteria approach.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 17(3), 189–210.
Ecobilan Croup. (1999). DEAM™ (Data for Environmental Analysis and Management) Database, Ecobilan Group, France.
Feiock, R. C., and West, J. P.(1993). “Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: municipal solid waste recycling programs.” Political Res. Quart., 46, 399–419.
Gould, M. (1997). “Composting technology from MSW.” Int. Symposium for Waste Management Structure and Recycling Technology.
Halla Engineering and Industrial Development (HID). (1999). Final report for anaerobic digester development for organic components in Korean MSW, Halla Engineering and Industrial Development (HID) Co., Ltd. (in Korean).
Huang, G. H., Baetz, B. W., and Patry, G. G.(1993). “A frey fuzzy linear programming (GFLP) approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty.” Civ. Eng. Sys. , 10, 12–146.
Huang, G. H., Baetz, B. W., and Patry, G. G.(1994). “Grey dynamic programming for waste-management planning under uncertainty.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 120(3), 132–156.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1997). “Greenhouse gas inventory reference manual: Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.” Reference manual, Vol. 3, IPCC.
Juang, C. H., Lee, K., and Chen, J. W.(1995a). “A new approach for siting landfills using fuzzy sets.” Civ. Eng. Sys., 12, 85–103.
Juang, C. H., Wu, S., and Sheu, H. J.(1995b). “A group decision making model for siting LULUs.” J. Environ. Profess., 17, 43–50.
Klir, G. J., and Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Korea Resource Recovery and Reutilization Corporation (KRR&RC). (1996). The future of compost and waste management policy, KRR&RC (in Korean).
Korean Accreditation Board (KAB). (1999). “Life cycle inventory data for the Korean electricity.” KAB 〈http://www.kab.or.kr〉.
Lee, K. M.(1999). “A weighting method for the Korean eco-indicator.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assessment, 4(3), 161–165.
Lee, Y. W., Dahab, M. F., and Bogardi, I.(1992). “Nitrate risk management under uncertainty.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 118(2), 151–165.
Mathworks. (2000). Fuzzy logic toolbox user’s guide, Version 2, The Mathworks Inc.
Michael, E. H., David, D. J., and Wayne, E. W.(1996). “Hazard ranking of landfills using fuzzy composite programming.” J. Environ. Eng. (Reston, Va.), 122(4), 248–258.
Ministry of Environment (MOE). (1999). Statistical yearbook for environment, Republic of Korea, 46, 124–134 (in Korean).
Moon, J. H., and Kang, C. S.(2001). “Application of fuzzy decision making method to the evaluation of spent fuel storage options.” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 39(3–4), 345–351.
OECD. (1998). “Executive summary phase II on extended and shared producer responsibility.” ENV/EPOC/PPC(97)/REV2, 5–12.
Saaty, T. L.(1990). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy approach.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48, 9–26.
Sobral, M., Hipel, K., and Farquhar, G.(1981). “A multicriteria model for solid waste management.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 12, 97–110.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1995). Compilation of air pollutant emission factors, volumes I and II, 4th Ed., US EPA, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Wei, M., and Weber, F.(1995). “Decision making for waste management.” Chem. Eng. Commun., 134, 133–145.
Wilson, E. J., McDougall, F., and Willmore, J.(2001). “Eutro-trash: searching Europe for a more sustainable approach to waste management.” Resour., Conservation and Recycling, 31, 327–346.
Zadeh, L. A.(1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control., 8, 338–353.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 21, 2001
Accepted: Jul 2, 2002
Published online: May 15, 2003
Published in print: Jun 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.