Mercury Adsorption Properties of Sulfur-Impregnated Adsorbents
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 11
Abstract
Carbonaceous and noncarbonaceous adsorbents were impregnated with elemental sulfur to evaluate the chemical and physical properties of the adsorbents and their equilibrium mercury adsorption capacities. Simulated coal combustion flue gas conditions were used to determine the equilibrium adsorption capacities for and gases to better understand how to remove mercury from gas streams generated by coal-fired utility power plants. Sulfur was deposited onto the adsorbents by monolayer surface deposition or volume pore filling. Sulfur impregnation increased the total sulfur content and decreased the total and micropore surface areas and pore volumes for all of the adsorbents tested. Adsorbents with sufficient amounts of active adsorption sites and sufficient microporous structure had mercury adsorption capacities up to 4,509 μg Hg/g adsorbent. Elemental sulfur, organic sulfur, and sulfate were formed on the adsorbents during sulfur impregnation. Correlations were established with between the equilibrium adsorption capacities and the mass concentrations of elemental and organic sulfur. This result indicates that elemental and organic sulfur are important active adsorption sites for and
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adriano, D. C., Page, A. L., Elseewi, A. A., Chang, A. C., and Staughan, I.(1980). “Utilization and disposal of fly ash and other coal residues in terrestrial ecosystems: A review.” J. Environ. Qual., 9(3), 333–344.
ASTM. (1997a). “Standard test methods for carbon black-surface area by multipoint B.E.T. nitrogen adsorption.” D4820-96a, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (1997b). “Standard test methods for sulfur in the analysis sample of coal and coke using high temperature tube furnace combustion methods.” D4239-94, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Bansal, R. C., Donnet, J.-B., and Stoeckli, F. (1988). Active carbon, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Breck, D. W. (1973). Zeolite molecular sieves, Wiley, New York.
Carey, T. R., Hargrove, O. W., Jr., Richardson, C. F., Chang, R., and Meserole, F. B.(1998). “Factors affecting mercury control in utility flue gas using activated carbon.” J. Air Waste Manage Assoc., 48, 1166–1174.
Chang, R., and Offen, G. R.(1995). “Mercury emission control technologies: An EPRI synopsis.” Power Eng.,November, 51–57.
Gregg, S. J., and Sing, K. S. W. (1967). Adsorption, surface area and porosity, Academic, New York.
Hsi, H.-C., Chen, S., Rostam-Abadi, M., Rood, M. J., Richardson, C. F., Carey, T. R., and Chang, R.(1998). “Preparation and evaluation of coal-derived activated carbons for removal of mercury vapor from simulated coal combustion flue gases.” Energy Fuels, 12(6), 1061–1070.
Hsi, H.-C., Rood, M. J., Rostam-Abadi, M., Chen, S., and Chang, R.(2001). “Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs).” Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(13), 2785–2791.
Huggins, F. E., Vaidya, S. V., Shah, N., and Huffman, G. P.(1993). “Investigation of sulfur forms extracted from coal by perchloroethylene.” Fuel Process. Technol., 35, 233–257.
Kerr, G. T.(1966). “Chemistry of crystalline aluminosilicates. I. Factors affecting the formation of zeolite A.” J. Phys. Chem., 70(4), 1047–1049.
Korpiel, J. A., and Vidic, R. D.(1997). “Effect of sulfur impregnation method on activated carbon uptake of gas-phase mercury.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 31(8), 2319–2325.
Krishnan, S. V., Gullett, B. K., and Jozewicz, W.(1994). “Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28(8), 1506–1512.
Lippens, B. C., Linsen, B. G., and de Boer, J. H.(1964). “Studies on pore systems in catalysts I. The adsorption of nitrogen; apparatus and calculation.” J. Catal., 3, 32–37.
Liu, W., Vidic, R. D., and Brown, T. D.(1998). “Optimization of sulfur impregnation protocol for fixed-bed application of activated carbon-based sorbents for gas-phase mercury removal.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(4), 531–538.
Liu, W., Vidic, R. D., and Brown, T. D.(2000). “Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(1), 154–159.
Livengood, C. D., Huang, H. S., and Wu, J. M. (1994). “Experimental evaluation of sorbents for the capture of mercury in flue gases.” Proc., 87th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air and Waste Management Assoc., Cincinnati.
Matsumura, Y.(1974). “Adsorption of mercury vapor on the surface of activated carbons modified by oxidation or iodization.” Atmos. Environ., 8, 1321–1327.
Steijns, M., Peppelenbos, A., and Mars, P.(1976). “Mercury chemisorption by sulfur adsorbed in porous materials.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 57(1), 181–186.
Sun, J., Chen, S., Rood, M. J., and Rostam-Abadi, M.(1998). “Correlating and adsorption on microporous carbon using a new analytical model.” Energy Fuels, 12(6), 1071–1078.
Tuller, W. N., ed. (1954). The sulphur data book, McGraw-Hill, New York.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1997). “Mercury study report to congress volume VIII: An evaluation of mercury control technologies and costs.” Rep. No. EPA-452/R-97-005, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 128 • Issue 11 • November 2002
Pages: 1080 - 1089
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 24, 2001
Accepted: Feb 13, 2002
Published online: Oct 15, 2002
Published in print: Nov 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.