Pool Quality Index: New Method to Define Minimum Flow Requirements of High-Gradient, Low-Order Streams
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 11
Abstract
High-gradient (>1%), low-order streams, characterized by hydraulically nonuniform and heterogeneous channels, represent a problem for the most widely employed habitat-based in-stream flow methods (IFIM-PHABSIM). In a nonuniform high gradient and turbulent channel, as low-order streams usually are, the classical 1D hydraulic modeling, ordinarily employed by in-stream flow models to simulate the changes in fish habitat with the flow, could be questionable, if not completely inapplicable. Channel morphology in fact plays a major role in association with hydraulics in determining the abiotic environments (biotopes) in which aquatic communities live. Particularly, in low-order river systems, different channel form features shape the biological community that can be hosted in a certain biotope. For this reason, the link between morphology and discharge is important when evaluating possible impacts of flow reduction on aquatic organisms. To represent the relationship between hydraulics and channel morphology quantitatively, a hydraulic diversity concept has been adopted. Studies from the literature have revealed that, in a regulated river, a decrease of the environmental variability including hydraulic diversity quite often resulted in a downstream decrease of the macro-invertebrate diversity, which can consequently affect fish biomass. These considerations create the ground for a hydraulic diversity-discharge–based in-stream flow method with the aim to promote high community diversity in a low-order regulated stream. A statistic ordination technique (correspondence analysis) applied to 370 hydraulic sections helped to identify four main morphological units (pools, deep pools, and slow and fast riffles) in terms of hydraulic diversity. In each morphological unit, the hydraulic diversity-discharge relationship was investigated and modeled by means of best-fit regression curves. Combining the hydraulic diversity-discharge curves from different morphological units (pools and riffles), a simplified model of the stream [pool quality index (PQI)] was obtained. This model has been applied to make recommendations for the minimum flow requirements in six low-order river sites. PQI recommendations were consistent with hydrology and other hydrology-based in-stream flow methodologies. Finally, a multiple regression model indicated that in 12 low-order stream sites a good deal of the variability of macro-invertebrate diversity is explained by the availability of hydraulic environments modeled by means of PQI curves. In conclusion, given the encouraging cues about the ecological meaning of PQI and the possibility to overcome difficulties typically encountered by other methods in the low-order river modeling, PQI can be considered a valid alternative for assessing the in-stream flow needs of low-order streams.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Armitage, P. D. ( 1978). “Downstream changes in the composition, numbers and biomass of bottom fauna in the Tees below Cow Green Reservoir and in an unregulated tributary Maize Beck, in the first five years after impoundment.” Hydrobiologia, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 58, 145–156.
2.
Armitage, P. D., and Pardo, I. ( 1995). “Impact assessment of regulation at reach level using macroinvertebrate information from mesohabitats.” Regulated Rivers: Res. and Mgmt., 10, 147–158.
3.
Bingham, C. R., and Miller, A. C. ( 1989). “Colonization of a man-made gravel bar by Oligochaeta.” Hydrobiologia, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 180, 229–234.
4.
Binns, N. A., and Eiserman, F. M. ( 1979). “Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming.” Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 108, 215–228.
5.
Boon, P. J. ( 1987). “The influence of Kielder water on trichopteran (caddisfly) populations in the River North Tyne (northern England).” Regulated Rivers: Res. and Mgmt., 1, 95–109.
6.
Boon, P. J. ( 1988). “The impact of river regulation on invertebrate community in the U.K.” Regulated Rivers: Res. and Mgmt., 2, 389–409.
7.
Bovee, K. D. ( 1982). “A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology.” Instream Flow Information Paper 12, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/26, Washington, D.C.
8.
Bovee, K. D. ( 1986). “Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology.” Instream Flow Information Paper 21, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biol. Rep. 86(7), Washington, D.C.
9.
Brusven, M. A., MacPhee, C., and Biggam, R. C. ( 1974). “Effects of water fluctuations on benthic insects.” Anatomy of a river, Pacific Northwest River Basins Rep., Vancouver, Wash., 67–79.
10.
Corkum, L. D. ( 1991). “Spatial patterns of macroinvertebrate distribution along rivers in eastern deciduous forest and grassland biomes.” Freshwater Biol., 17, 201–221.
11.
Davis, J. A., and Barmuta, L. A. ( 1989). “An ecologically useful classification of mean and near-bed flows in streams and rivers.” Freshwater Biol., 21, 271–282.
12.
DeBrey, L. D., and Lockwood, J. A. ( 1990). “Effects of sediment and flow regime on the aquatic insects of a high mountain stream.” Regulated Rivers: Res. and Mgmt., 5, 241–250.
13.
Downes, B. J., Lake, P. S., and Schreiber, E. S. G. ( 1993). “Spatial variation in the distribution of stream invertebrates: Implications of patchiness for models of community organisation.” Freshwater Biol., 30, 119–132.
14.
Edwards, C. J., Griswold, B. L., Tubb, R. A., Weber, E. C., and Woods, L. C. ( 1984). “Mitigating effects of artificial riffles and pools on the fauna of channelized warmwater stream.” North Am. J. Fisheries Mgmt., 4, 194–203.
15.
Elliott, J. M. ( 1971). “Statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates.” Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publ. No. 25, Ambleside, U.K.
16.
Forlong, R. G. ( 1994). “Determining minimum flows for rivers in the Kapiti Coast district.” Proc., 1994 Limnological Soc. Conf., New Zealand Limnological Society, Hamilton, New Zealand.
17.
Good, I. J. ( 1953). “The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters.” Biometrika, 40, 237–264.
18.
Gore, J. A. ( 1985). “Mechanisms of colonisation and habitat enhancement for benthic macroinvertebrates in restored river channels.” The restoration of rivers and streams, J. A. Gore, ed., Butterworth, Boston, 81–101.
19.
Gore, J. A., Crawford, D. J., and Addison, D. S. ( 1996). “An analysis of artificial riffles and enhancement of benthic community diversity by physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) and direct observation.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Habitat Hydr. Ecohydraulics 2000, Vol. B, B643–B649.
20.
Greenacre, M. J. ( 1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, Academic Press, London.
21.
Heede, B. H., and Rinne, J. N. ( 1990). “Hydrodynamic and fluvial geomorphological process: Implications for fisheries management and research.” North Am. J. Fisheries Mgmt., 10, 249–268.
22.
Hildrew, A. G., and Giller, P. S. ( 1994). “Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in stream benthos.” Aquatic ecology: Scale, pattern, and process, P. S. Giller, A. G. Hildrew, and D. G. Raffaelli, eds., Blackwell Scientific, London, 21–62.
23.
Hynes, H. B. N. ( 1970). The Ecology of running waters, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
24.
Jowett, I. G. ( 1993). “A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements.” New Zealand J. Marine and Freshwater Res., 27, 241–248.
25.
Leavesley, G. H., Lichty, R. W., Troutman, B. M., and Saindon, L. G. ( 1983). Precipitation-runoff modeling system: User's manual, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations 83-4238, Washington, D.C.
26.
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. P. ( 1964). Fluvial processes in geomorphology, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
27.
Milhous, R. T., Updike, M. A., and Schneider, D. M. ( 1989). “Physical habitat simulation system. Version II.” Instream Flow Information Paper No. 26, Nat. Ecology Res. Ctr., Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
28.
Nelson, F. A. ( 1980). “Evaluation of four instream flow methods applied to four trout rivers in southwest Montana.” Publ. W/IFG-80/W90, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group, Fort Collins, Colo.
29.
O'Connor, N. A. ( 1991). “The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrate colonising wood substrates in a lowland streams.” Oecologia, 85, 504–512.
30.
Pridmore, R. D., and Roper, D. S. ( 1985). “Comparison of the macroinvertebrate faunas of runs and riffles in three New Zealand streams.” New Zealand J. Marine and Freshwater Res., 19, 283–291.
31.
Scullion, J., Parish, C. A., Morgan, N., and Edwards, R. W. ( 1982). “Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and substratum composition in riffles and pools in the impounded River Elan and the unregulated River Wye, mid-Wales.” Freshwater Biol., 12, 579–595.
32.
Scullion, J., and Sinton, A. ( 1983). “Effects of artificial freshets on substratum composition, benthic invertebrate fauna, and invertebrate drift in two impounded rivers in mid-Wales.” Hydrobiologia, 107, 261–269.
33.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. ( 1949). The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill., 19–27, 82–83, 104–107.
34.
Simonsons, T. D., Lyons, J., and Kanehl, P. D. ( 1994). “Quantifying fish habitat in streams: Transect spacing, sample size and a proposed framework.” North Am. J. Fisheries Mgmt., 14, 607–615.
35.
Statzner, B., Gore, J. A., and Resh, V. H. ( 1988). “Hydraulic stream ecology: Observed patterns and potential application.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc., 7, 307–360.
36.
Statzner, B., and Higler, B. ( 1986). “Stream hydraulics as the major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns.” Freshwater Biol., 16, 127–139.
37.
Tennant, D. L. ( 1976). “Instream flow requirements for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources.” Proc., Symp. and Spec. Conf. on “Instream Flow Needs,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Vol. 2, Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Md., 359–373.
38.
Wadeson, R. A. ( 1994). “A geomorphological approach to the identification and classification of instream flow environments.” South African J. Acquatic Sci., 20(1/2), 38–61.
39.
Wallace, J. B., Webster, J. R., and Meyer, J. L. ( 1995). “Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream.” Can. J. Fisheries and Aquatic Sci., 52, 2120–2137.
40.
Ward, J. V. ( 1984). “Ecological perspective in the management of aquatic insect habitat.” The ecology of aquatic insects, V. H. Resh and D. M. Rosenberg, eds., Praeger, New York, 558–577.
41.
Ward, J. V. ( 1992). Aquatic insect ecology. 1. Biology and habitat, Wiley, New York.
42.
Way, C. M., Burky, A. J., Bingham, C. R., and Miller, A. C. ( 1995). “Substrate roughness, velocity refuges, and macroinvertebrate abundance on artificial substrates in the lower Mississippi River.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc., 14, 510–518.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 11 • November 2001
Pages: 1003 - 1013
History
Received: Nov 28, 2000
Published online: Nov 1, 2001
Published in print: Nov 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.