Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminated Soils. I: Soil Characterization
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 11
Abstract
Industrial sites frequently have arsenic-contaminated soils as a result of repeated applications of arsenic herbicides. Four such sites were investigated to determine the suitability of cement-based solidification/stabilization (S/S) for in situ soil treatment. Arsenic concentrations ranged up to about 2,000 ppm in the soil, although leachability was relatively low. No toxicity characteristic leaching procedure leachates showed As concentrations as high as 5 mg/L. The low leachability appears to be due, at least in part, to iron present in the soil. Although soils with higher As concentrations generally showed greater leachability, a somewhat stronger relationship existed between the percentage of As in the soil that was leached and the iron concentration in the soil. Another factor working in favor of the success of S/S in the present cases is the sandy character of the soils with little clay or organic content. Thus, the quartz sand will serve as an aggregate and should not offer any interferences to cement hydration. A third favorable circumstance is afforded by the oxidizing character of the soils. The weathered arsenic present in the soils should be in the form of As(V), and arsenate salts present a wider range of possibilities for precipitation of insoluble arsenic species than arsenite salts. A significant variable with the potential to affect S/S is the soil moisture content, which varied greatly among the four sites due to differing water table depth.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Public Health Association (APHA). 1989. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th Ed., Washington, D.C., 3-29–3-31.
2.
Code of federal regulations. (1997). 40 CFR 268.40, July 2.
3.
Conner, J. R., and Lear, P. R. ( 1992). “Treatment of landban-varianced arsenic wastes at TSDFs.” Proc., Workshop on Removal, Recovery, Treatment and Disposal of Arsenic and Mercury, 51–55.
4.
Faulkner, S. P., Patrick, W. H., Jr. and Gambrell, R. P. ( 1989). “Field technique for measuring wetland soil parameters.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 883–890.
5.
Federal Register. (1990). 55(No. 106; June 1), 22556–22561.
6.
Mok, W. M., and Wai, C. M. ( 1994). “Mobilization of arsenic in contaminated river waters.” Arsenic in the environment, Part I, J. R. Nriagu, ed., Wiley, New York, 99–117.
7.
O'Neill, P. ( 1990). “Arsenic.” Heavy metals in soils, B. J. Alloway, ed., Halsted Press, New York.
8.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1992). Proc., Workshop on Removal, Recovery, Treatment and Disposal of Arsenic and Mercury., USEPA Rep., EPA/600/R-92/105, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
9.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1997). Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, physical/chemical methods (SW846), 3rd Ed., Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Aug 30, 1999
Published online: Nov 1, 2000
Published in print: Nov 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.