Media-Induced Hydraulic Behavior and Performance of Upflow Biofilters
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 8
Abstract
Laboratory studies were conducted to assess the influence of media-related factors such as porosity, specific surface, and pore size on hydraulic behavior and performance of upflow anaerobic biofilters (ABFs). Three 15-L upflow biofilters, each packed with different support media, were subject to identical synthetic protein-carbohydrate substrate with chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations ranging from 2,500 to 10,000 mg/L, and hydraulic retention times from 15 to 30 hours, corresponding to organic loading rates (OLRs) varying from 2 to 16 g COD/L/d. Tracer studies were carried out to characterize hydraulic behavior of the biofilters containing media with and without biomass, designated as dirty-bed and clean-bed, respectively. The results indicate that hydraulic flow regimes in all biofilters were characterized by a plug-flow pattern with a large extent of dispersion under clean-bed conditions. The tracer response curve under dirty-bed conditions operating at an OLR of 16 g COD/L/d reflects more closely the response of a mixed-flow reactor than that of a plug-flow unit, which suggests that there is significant short-circuiting in the ABFs. Waste treatment performance indicates that the biofilter associated with media of the largest pore size and porosity consistently demonstrated the highest COD removal from 96% to 73% at loadings varying from 2 to 16 g COD/L/d. The same reactor exhibited the lowest magnitude of dispersion along with minimum dead space within the bed from the tracer analysis. This implies that the use of support media with larger pore size and porosity may reduce the extent of short-circuiting, leading to better waste treatment performance. Increasing the media specific surface at the expense of media porosity may result in lower treatment performance in upflow anaerobic biofilters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chiang, C. F., and Dague, R. R.(1992). “Effects of reactor configuration and biomass activity on the performance of upflow static media anaerobic reactors.”Water Envir. Res., 64(2), 141–149.
2.
Choi, E., and Burkhead, C. E. (1982). “The hydrodynamic evaluation of a fixed media biological process.”Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Fixed-Film Biol. Processes, 1542.
3.
Dolfing, J., and Mulder, J. W.(1985). “Comparison of methane production rate and coenzyme F420 content of methanogenic consortia in anaerobic granular sludge.”Appl. Envir. Microbiol., 49(5), 1142–1145.
4.
Fox, P., and Suidan, M. T.(1990). “Batch tests to determine activity distribution and kinetic parameters for acetate utilization in expanded-bed anaerobic reactors.”Appl. Envir. Microbiol., 56, 887–894.
5.
Hudson, J. W., Pohland, F. G., and Pendergrass, R. P. (1978). “Anaerobic packed column treatment of shellfish processing wastewater.”Proc., 33rd Industrial Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
6.
Kennedy, K. J., and van den Berg, L. (1985). “Anaerobic downflow stationary fixed film reactors.”Comprehensive Biotechnology, Vol. 4, M. Moo-Young, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1027–1049.
7.
Levenspiel, O. (1972). Chemical reaction engineering, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, U.K.
8.
Levenspiel, O., and Smith, W. K.(1975). “Notes on the diffusion-type model for the longitudinal mixing of fluid in flow.”Chemical Engrg. Sci., 6, 227–233.
9.
Mueller, J. A., and Mancini, J. L. (1975). “Anaerobic filter-kinetics and applications.”Proc., 30th Industrial Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
10.
Owen, W. F., Stuckey, D. C., Healy, J. B. Jr., Young, L. Y., and McCarty, P. L.(1979). “Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity.”Water Res., 13, 485.
11.
Reimer, M., Kristensen, G. H., and Harremoes, P.(1980). “Residence time distribution in submerged biofilters.”Water Res., 14, 949–958.
12.
Song, K. H., and Young, J. C. (1986). “Media design factors for fixed-bed anaerobic filters.”J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 58(2), 115–121. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed. (1992). Am. Public Health Assn. (APHA), Washington, D.C.
13.
Suidan, M. T., Siekerka, G. L., Kao, S. W., and Pfeffer, J. T.(1983). “Anaerobic filters for the treatment of coal gasification wastewater.”Biotech. Bioengrg., 26, 1581–1596.
14.
Tay, J. H., Show, K. Y., and Jeyaseelan, S.(1996). “Effects of media characteristics on the performance of upflow anaerobic packed-bed reactors.”J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 122(6), 469–476.
15.
Tchbanoglous, G., and Schroeder, E. D. (1985). Water quality. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Turner digital filter fluorometer model 112—Installation and operating manual . (1982). Sequoia-Turner Corp.
16.
Young, J. C., and McCarty, P. L. (1967). “The anaerobic filter for waste treatment.”Proc., 22nd Industrial Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 124 • Issue 8 • August 1998
Pages: 720 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1998
Published in print: Aug 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.