Optimal Design for Anaerobic Pretreatment of Municipal Wastewater
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 1
Abstract
In recent years the advent of the anaerobic expanded bed reactor (AEBR) has made possible the treatment of wastewaters of comparatively lower strength than have been treated traditionally by anaerobic means. However, regardless of any benefits presented by its use, the process must be shown to be cost effective relative to other options before it will gain acceptance. This paper reports on the results of a series of optimization exercises in which the costs of the AEBR as an expansion alternative for organically overloaded treatment plants are compared with costs for more conventional remedies. The optimization model developed includes the unit processes of primary clarification, AEBR, trickling filtration, secondary clarification, activated sludge, gravity thickening, anaerobic digestion, and vacuum filtration. Several constraint parameters were varied to determine the cases for which the AEBR would be the cost-effective option. These parameters were primary effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD), hydraulic loading, temperature, cost of labor, cost of power, cost of sludge disposal, and amortization interest rate. The results suggest that the AEBR may be a competitive solution for organically overloaded facilities under selected conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alderman, B. J. (1994). “Optimization studies for the use of anaerobic pretreatment at small wastewater treatment facilities.”Rep. No. 94-1, W. J. Rowley Lab., Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, N.Y.
2.
Alderman, B. J., Theis, T. L., and Collins, A. G.(1994). “Numerical Approach to Clarifier Operation According to Flux Theory.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 120(3), 670–676.
3.
American Public Health Association (APHA) (1989). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
4.
Black and Veatch. (1971). “Estimating cost and manpower requirements for conventional wastewater treatment facilities.”EPA Water Pollution Res. Ser. 17090, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
5.
Box, M. J.(1965). “A new method of constrained optimization and comparison with other methods.”Computer J., 8, 42–52.
6.
Chapman, D. T.(1983). “The influence of process variables on secondary clarification.”J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 55, 1425–1434.
7.
Craig, E. W., Meridith, D. D., and Middleton, A. C.(1978). “Algorithm for optimal activated sludge design.”J. Envir. Engrg. Div., Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., 104, 1101–1117.
8.
Grady, L. C. P., Jr., and Lim, H. C. (1980). Biological wastewater treatment: theory and applications. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
9.
Jeris, J. S., Owens, R. W., and Hickey, R. F.(1974). “High rate biological denitrification using a granular fluidized bed.”J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 46, 2118–2128.
10.
Jewell, W. J.(1987). “Anaerobic sewage treatment.”Envir. Sci. and Technol., 21, 14–21.
11.
Jewell, W. J. (1990). “Energy and biomass recovery from wastewater pilot documentation.”Ann. Rep., New York State Energy Res. and Devel. Authority Contract No. 1365-ERER-ER-90, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.
12.
Kilambi, S. (1993). “The treatability of primary clarified domestic sewage by anaerobic expanded bed reactors.”Rep. No. 93-14, W. J. Rowley Lab., Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, N.Y.
13.
Kim, R. B., Zernia, J. F., Anderson, S. G., Stroup, D. P., and Rai, D. N.(1992). “Anaerobic removal of COD in metal-cutting-fluid wastewater.”Water Envir. Res., 64, 216–222.
14.
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (1991). Wastewater engineering. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
15.
Mishra, P. N.(1974). “Optimal capacity expansion of a secondary treatment system,”J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 46, 2704–2718.
16.
Parker, D. S., and Merrill, D. T.(1984). “Effect of plastic media configuration on trickling filter performance.”J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 56, 955–961.
17.
Reynolds, T. D. (1982). Unit operations and processes in environmental engineering. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, Mass.
18.
Shelton, R. D., and Tiedje, J. M.(1984). “General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 47, 850–857.
19.
Switzenbaum, M. S., Sheehan, K. C., and Hickey, R. F.(1984). “Anaerobic treatment of primary effluent.”Envir. Technol. Letters, 5, 189–200.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 124 • Issue 1 • January 1998
Pages: 4 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1998
Published in print: Jan 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.