TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 1995

Performance and Cost Modeling of Ultrafiltration

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 12

Abstract

Models describing permeate flux, rejection, and cost are coupled to evaluate the performance and cost of ultrafiltration as a function of raw-water quality. The model for permeate flux extends a previous model for colloidal fouling based on shear-induced diffusivity to include Brownian diffusion. Contaminant removal is modeled as mechanical sieving and molecular diameter is regressed against weight to describe removal of natural organic matter (NOM). Time-dependent permeate flux is considered in estimating operating times required to achieve a specified recovery. Costs are calculated as a function of particle-size distribution in the raw water. Particles with diameters on the order of 10 −1 μm display minimum diffusivities, which leads to maximum system costs with respect to particle size. Fine materials ( <0.5 μm), with high cake resistance, demonstrate pressure-independent permeate flux for conditions typical of hollow fiber ultrafiltration. In some cases, a minimum in system costs as a function of recovery is observed due to a trade-off between operating time and time-averaged permeate flux. Simulations for four scenarios of variable particle and NOM concentrations suggest that irrespective of adsorptive fouling, permeate flux may be limited by reversible accumulations of NOM on ultrafiltration membranes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Altena, F. W., and Belfort, G.(1984). “Lateral migration of spherical particles in porous flow channels: application to membrane filtration.”Chem. Engrg. Sci., 39(2), 343–355.
2.
Anderson, J. L., and Quinn, J. A.(1974). “Restricted transport in small pores; a model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion.”Biophysical J., 14(2), 130–150.
3.
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N. (1960). Transport phenomena . Wiley, New York, N.Y.
4.
Davidson, M. G., and Deen, W. M.(1988). “Hydrodynamic theory for the hindered transport of flexible macromolecules in porous membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 35(2), 167–192.
5.
Davis, R. H.(1992a). “Modeling of fouling of crossflow microfiltration membranes.”Separation and Purification Meth., 21(2), 75–126.
6.
Davis, R. H. (1992b). “Theory for crossflow microfiltration.”Membrane handbook. Winston Ho, W. S. and Sirkar, K. K., eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y., 480–505.
7.
Davis, R. H., and Birdsell, S. A. (1987). “Hydrodynamic model and experiments for crossflow microfiltration.”Chem. Engrg. Comm., 49(4–6), 217–234.
8.
Davis, R. H., and Sherwood, J. D.(1990). “A similarity solution for steady-state crossflow microfiltration.”Chem. Engrg. Sci., 45(11), 3203–3209.
9.
Dennis, J. E., and Schnabel, R. B. (1983). Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations . Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
Eckstein, E. C., Bailey, D. G., and Shapiro, A. H.(1977). “Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of a suspension.”J. Fluid Mech., 79(1), 191–208.
11.
Ferry, J. D.(1936). “Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration.”J. Gen. Physiol., 20(1), 95–104.
12.
Giddings, J. C., Kucera, E., Russell, C. P., and Myers, M. N.(1968). “Statistical theory for the equilibrium distribution of rigid molecules in inert porous networks. Exclusion chromatography.”J. Physic. Chem., 72(13), 4397–4408.
13.
Green, G., and Belfort, G. (1980). “Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: lateral migration and the particle trajectory model.”Desalination, 35(1–3), 129–147.
14.
Jacangelo, J. G., Lâiné, J. M., Cummings, E. W., Deutschmann, A., Mallevialle, J., and Wiesner, M. R. (1994). Evaluation of ultrafiltration membrane pretreatment and nanofiltration of surface waters . AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, Colo.
15.
Kedem, O., and Katchalsky, A.(1961). “A physical interpretation of the phenomenological coefficients of membrane permeability.”J. Gen. Physiol., 45(1), 143–179.
16.
Leighton, D., and Acrivos, A.(1986). “Viscous resuspension.”Chem. Engrg. Sci., 41(6), 1377–1384.
17.
Leighton, D., and Acrivos, A.(1987a). “Measurement of shear-induced self-diffusion in concentrated suspensions of spheres.”J. Fluid Mech., 177, 109–131.
18.
Leighton, D., and Acrivos, A.(1987b). “The shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions.”J. Fluid Mech., 181, 415–430.
19.
Leonard, E. F., and Vassilieff, C. S. (1984). “The deposition of rejected matter in membrane separation processes.”Chem. Engrg. Comm., 30(3–5), 209–217.
20.
Mason, S. G.(1977). “Orthokinetic phenomena in disperse systems.”J. Colloid Interface Sci., 58(2), 275–285.
21.
Otis, J. R., Altena, F. W., Mahar, J. T., and Belfort, G.(1986). “Measurements of single spherical particle trajectories with lateral migration in a slit with one porous wall under laminar flow conditions.”Experiments in Fluids, 4(1), 1–10.
22.
Paine, P. L., and Scherr, P.(1975). “Drag coefficients for the movement of rigid spheres through liquid-filled cylindrical pores.”Biophysical J., 15(10), 1087–1091.
23.
Pickering, K. D., and Wiesner, M. R.(1993). “Cost model for low-pressure membrane filtration.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 119(5), 772–797.
24.
Porter, M. C.(1972). “Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration.”Ind. Engrg. Chem., Prod. Res. Develop., 11(3), 234–248.
25.
Romero, C. A., and Davis, R. H.(1988). “Global model of crossflow microfiltration based on hydrodynamic particle diffusion.”J. Membrane Sci., 39(2), 157–185.
26.
Romero, C. A., and Davis, R. H.(1990). “Transient model of crossflow microfiltration.”Chem. Engrg. Sci., 45(1), 13–25.
27.
Romero, C. A., and Davis, R. H.(1991). “Experimental verification of the shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion model of crossflow microfiltration.”J. Membrane Sci., 62(3), 249–273.
28.
Taylor, J. S., Thompson, D. M., and Carswell, J. K.(1987). “Applying membrane processes to groundwater sources for trihalomethane precursor control.”J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 79(8), 72–82.
29.
Trettin, D. R., and Doshi, M. R.(1980). “Limiting flux in ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions.”Chem. Engrg. Comm., 4, 507–522.
30.
Weigand, R. J., Altena, F. W., and Belfort, G.(1985). “Lateral migration of spherical particles in laminar porous tube flows: application to membrane filtration.”Physicochem. Hydrodynamics, 6(4), 393–413.
31.
Wiesner, M. R., Clark, M. M., and Mallevialle, J.(1989). “Membrane filtration of coagulated suspensions.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 115(1), 20–40.
32.
Zeman, L., and Wales, M. (1981). “Polymer solute rejection by ultrafiltration membranes.”Synthetic Membranes: Volume II Hyper and Ultrafiltration Uses. A. F. Turbak, ed., American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 411–434.
33.
Zydney, A. L., and Colton, C. K. (1986). “A concentration polarization model for the filtrate flux in cross-flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions.”Chem. Engrg. Comm., 47(1–3), 1–21.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121Issue 12December 1995
Pages: 874 - 883

History

Published online: Dec 1, 1995
Published in print: Dec 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sandeep Sethi
Grad. Student, Dept. of Envir. Sci. and Engrg., Rice Univ., P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251.
Mark R. Wiesner
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Envir. Sci. and Engrg., Rice Univ., P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share