Cost‐Effective Solid‐Waste Characterization Methodology
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 4
Abstract
Characterization of municipal and county solid wastes as well as projection of waste‐generation and ‐disposal rates are need to plan and implement disposal and recycling activities. A literature review of solid‐waste characterization studies revealed that conventional sorting methods are expensive and yield data with great variability. The results of such characterization studies for metropolitan regions have large standard errors, and individual results often fall within the error bounds of reported national average values. An alternative and more cost‐effective methodology for estimating county‐ and city‐level solid‐waste composition and generation is proposed. The method is based on converting economic sales data for a metropolitan region into estimates of kilograms of solid waste generated. Prototype conversion factors were derived using a material balance approach. The methodology was calibrated using King County, Wash., data and validated on two adjacent counties. The results are promising enough that the methodology should be tested in other parts of the nation. The cost to apply this the methodology is a small fraction of the cost of conventional sorting methods, and comparable estimates of major solid‐waste components may be possible.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Analysis of Newcastle waste receipts, 1986. (1986). R. W. Beck and Assoc./Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Seattle, Wash.
2.
“Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States, 1960 to 2000 (update 1988).” (1988). EPA/530‐SW‐99‐033, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
3.
“Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States, 1960 to 2010 (update 1990).” (1990). EPA/530‐SW‐90‐042A, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
4.
Facts and figures of the U.S. plastics industry. (1990). Soc. of the Plastics Industry, Washington, D.C., Sep.
5.
Forecasts of the quantity and composition of solid waste. (1980). Envir. Protection Agency, Municipal Envir. Res. Lab., Office of Res. and Devel., Washington, D.C.
6.
Gay, A. (1991). “A cost effective solid waste monitoring program,” MS dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
7.
Hanson, A. A., and Juska, F. V., eds. (1969). Turfgrass science. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, Wis.
8.
King County nonresidential technical assistance program, generator type target profiles. (1990). Matrix Mgmt. Group, Inc., Seattle, Wash., Apr.
9.
Musa, E., and Ho, G. E. (1981). “Optimum sample size in refuse analysis.” J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(6), 1247–1260.
10.
1987 census of manufacture, geographic series, state of Washington. (1990a). U.S. Bureau of Census, Washington, D.C.
11.
1987 census of retail trade, geographic series, state of Washington. (1990b). U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
12.
1987 census of service industries, geographic series, western region. (1990c). U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
13.
1987 census of wholesale trade, geographic series, state of Washington. (1990d). U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.
14.
“Re: King County construction demolition, and land clearing waste telephone survey.” (1991). Tech. Memorandum, Herrera Envir. Consultants, Inc., Seattle, Wash.
15.
Recycling potential assessment and waste stream forecast. (1988). Seattle Solid Waste Utility, Seattle, Wash.
16.
Tchobanoglous, G., Thiesen, H., and Eliassen, R. (1977). Solid waste‐Emerging principles and management issues. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
17.
Test methods for evaluating solid waste. (1982). Envir. Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
18.
Tiebout, C. M. (1969). An empirical regional input‐output projection model: The state of Washington 1980. Univ. of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 6, 1992
Published online: Jul 1, 1993
Published in print: Jul 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.