Improved First‐Order Uncertainty Method for Water‐Quality Modeling
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 5
Abstract
Uncertainties are unavoidable in water‐quality modeling and subsequent management decisions. Monte Carlo simulation and first‐order uncertainty analysis (involving linearization at central values of the uncertain variables) have been frequently used to estimate probability distributions for water‐quality model output due to their simplicity. Each method has its drawbacks: Monte Carlo simulation's is mainly computational time; and first‐order analysis' are mainly questions of accuracy and representativeness, especially for nonlinear systems and extreme conditions. An improved (advanced) first‐order method is presented, where the linearization point varies to match the output level whose exceedance probability is sought. The advanced first‐order method is tested on the Streeter‐Phelps equation to estimate the probability distribution of critical dissolved‐oxygen deficit and critical dissolved oxygen using two hypothetical examples from the literature. The advanced first‐order method provides a close approximation of the exceedance probability for the Streeter‐Phelps model output estimated by Monte Carlo simulation using less computer time—by two orders of magnitude—regardless of the probability distributions assumed for the uncertain model parameters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beck, M. B. (1985). “Water quality management: A review of the development and application of mathematical models.” Lecture notes in engineering 11, C. A. Brebbia and S. A. Orszag, eds., Springer‐Verlag, New York, N.Y.
2.
Beck, M. B. (1987). “Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(5), 1393–1441.
3.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell, T. O., (1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E‐UNCAS: Documentation and user manual.” Report EPA/600/3‐87/007, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
4.
Burges, S. J., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1975). “Probabilistic methods in stream quality management.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(1), 115–130.
5.
Burn, D. H., and McBean, E. A. (1985). “Optimization modeling of water quality in an uncertain environment.” Water Resour. Res., 21(7), 934–940.
6.
Chadderton, R. A., Miller, A. C., and McDonnell, A. J. (1982). “Uncertainty analysis of dissolved oxygen model.” J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 108(5), 1003–1013.
7.
Cheng, S.‐T. (1982). “Overtopping risk for an existing dam,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign, Ill.
8.
Cornell, C. A. (1972). “First‐order analysis of model and parameter uncertainty.” Proc. Int. Symp. on Uncertainties in Hydrol. and Water Resour. Systems, University of Arizona, vol. 2, 1245–1272.
9.
Hasofer, A. M. (1974). “Reliability index and failure probability.” J. Struc. Mech., 3(1), 25–27.
10.
Hasofer, A. M., and Lind, N. S. (1974). “Exact invariant second‐moment code format.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 100(1), 111–121.
11.
Kooman, D., Vrijling, J. K., Maldir, T., and de Quelirij, L. (1978). “Probabilistic approach to determine loads and safety factors.” Symp. Found. Aspects of Coast. Struct., Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
12.
Melching, C. S. (1992). “An improved first‐order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 132, 157–177.
13.
Melching, C. S., Yen, B. C., and Wenzel, H. G., Jr. (1990). “A reliability estimation in modeling watershed runoff with uncertainties.” Water Resour. Res., 25(10), 2275–2286.
14.
Rackwitz, R. (1976). “Practical probabilistic approach to design.” Bulletin 112, Comite European du Beton, Paris, France.
15.
Rackwitz, R., and Fiessler, B. (1978). “Non‐normal vectors in structural reliability.” SFB 96 Report 29, Technical Univ. of Munich, Munich, West Germany, 1–22.
16.
Scavia, D., Canale, R. P., Powers, W. F., and Moody, J. L. (1981a). “Variance estimates for a dynamic eutrophication model of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.” Water Resour. Res., 17(4), 1115–1124.
17.
Scavia, D., Powers, W. F., Canale, R. P., and Moody, J. L. (1981b). “Comparison of first‐order error analysis and Monte Carlo simulation in time‐dependent lake eutrophication models.” Water Resour. Res., 17(4), 1051–1059.
18.
Sitar, N., Cawfield, J. D., and Der Kiureghian, A. (1987). “First‐order reliability approach to stochastic analysis of subsurface flow and contaminant transport.” Water Resour. Res., 23(5), 794–804.
19.
“Solubility of atmospheric oxygen in water.” (1960). Committee on Sanit. Engrg. Res., Sanit. Engrg. Div., J. Sanit. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 86(4), 41–53.
20.
Streeter, H. W. and Phelps, E. B. (1925). “A study of the pollution and purification of the Ohio River, III. Factors concerned in the phenomena of oxidation and reaeration.” Publ. Health Bull. 146, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C.
21.
Tung, Y.‐K., and Hathhorn, W. E. (1988). “Assessment of probability distribution of dissolved oxygen deficit.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 114(6), 1421–1435.
22.
Yen, B. C., Cheng, S.‐T., and Melching, C. S. (1986). “First‐order reliability analysis.” Stochastic and risk analysis in hydraulic engineering, B. C. Yen, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo., 1–36.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 5 • September 1992
Pages: 791 - 805
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1992
Published in print: Sep 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.