Probabilistic Soil Contamination Exposure Assessment Procedures
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 6
Abstract
A comparison is conducted between Monte Carlo simulation and first‐order uncertainty analysis within the framework of an exposure assessment procedure. The modeled scenario consists of contaminated soil located directly above an aquifer and upgradient of a water supply well. For the exposure assessment procedure, the exposure point concentration is predicted by performing Monte Carlo simulation using a one‐dimensional vertical, soil‐water solute‐transport model coupled with a two‐dimensional, horizontal ground‐water fate and transport model. The result is expressed as a probability distribution of the contaminant concentration at the point of human exposure (water supply well). To complete the exposure assessment procedure, the concentration corresponding to a prespecified risk level (usually 5%) is evaluated against the appropriate and/or relevant health‐based standards for the site. First‐order uncertainty analysis is another probabilistic method that under certain circumstances may be applied in place of Monte Carlo simulation. For the hypothetical site modeled in this research, first‐order uncertainty analysis was found to be a useful tool for examining the relative importance of the various site parameters, although the method was not found to be a substitute for Monte Carlo simulation in the context of this particular exposure assessment procedure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ang, A. H.‐S., and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering design: Volume I. Basic Principles. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
2.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). “Approximate moments and distributions of functions.” Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers, McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y., 180–186.
3.
Brakensiek, D. L., Engleman, R. L., and Rawls, W. J. (1981). “Variation within texture classes of soil water parameters.” Trans. ASAE, 335–339.
4.
Brooks, R. H., and Corey, A. T. (1964). “Hydraulic properties of porous media.” Colorado State University Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
5.
Burges, S. J., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1975). “Probabilistic methods in stream quality management.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(1), 115–130.
6.
Burn, D. H., and McBean, E. A. (1985). “Optimization modeling of water quality in an uncertain environment.” Water Resour. Res., 21(7), 934–940.
7.
Dettinger, M. D., and Wilson, J. L. (1981). “First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow. Part 1. Mathematical development.” Water Resour. Res., 17(1), 149–161.
8.
Enfield, C. G., et al. (1986). “Behavior of organic pollutants during rapid infiltration of wastewater into soil: II. Mathematical description of transport and transportation.” Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 3(1), 57–76.
9.
Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
“Hazardous waste management system; Land disposal restrictions: Proposed rule.” (1986). Federal Register, 51(9), Jan. 14, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1602–1766.
11.
Himmelblau, D. M. (1970). Process analysis by statistical methods. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
12.
Hunt, J. R., Sitar, N., and Udell, K. S. (1988). “Nonaqueous phase liquid transport and cleanup, 1. Analysis of mechanisms.” Water Resour. Res., 24(8), 1247–1258.
13.
Huyakorn, P. S., et al. (1985). “RCRA hazardous waste identification and land disposal restrictions groundwater screening procedure, Draft Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
14.
Huyakorn, P. S., et al. (1987). “A three dimensional analytical method for predicting leachate migration.” Groundwater, 25(5), 588–598.
15.
Jury, W. A., Spencer, W. F., and Farmer, W. J. (1983). “Behavior assessment model for trace organics in soil: Model description.” J. Envir. Qual., 12(4), 558–564.
16.
Ku, H. H. (1966). “Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas.” J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., Section C, Engrg. and Instrumentation, 70C(4), 263–273.
17.
Mackay, D. M., et al. (1982). “Volatilization of organic pollutants from water.” Environmental Research Laboratory Report No. EPA 600/3‐82‐019, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
18.
McCuen, R. H., Rawls, W. J., and Brakensiek, D. L. (1981). “Statistical analysis of the Brooks‐Corey and the Green‐Ampt parameters across soil textures.” Water Resour. Res., 17(4), 1005–1013.
19.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green‐Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 109(1), 62–70.
20.
Siddall, J. N. (1983). “Probabilistic analysis.” Probabilistic engineering design, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y., 145–236.
21.
Smith, V. J. (1987). “First‐order uncertainty analysis of hazardous waste land treatment systems,” thesis presented to the University of Texas, at Austin, Tex., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
22.
Tung, Y. K., and Mays, L. W. (1980). “Optimal risk‐based design of water resource engineering projects.” Technical Report No. 171, Center for Research in Water Resources, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 6 • October 1990
Pages: 1143 - 1163
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1990
Published in print: Oct 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.