Evaluation of Activated Sludge Oxygen Uptake Rate Test Procedures
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 3
Abstract
A series of bench‐ and pilot‐scale experiments was conducted to evaluate the ability of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) bottle‐based oxygen uptake rate (OUR) analyses to represent accurately in situ OUR in complete mix‐activated sludge systems. Aeration basin off‐gas analyses indicated that, depending on system operating conditions, BOD bottle‐based analyses could either underestimate in situ OUR rates by as much as 58% or overestimate in situ rates by up to 285%. The use of a continuous flow respirometer system was used to verify the off‐gas analysis observations and assess better the rate of change in OUR after mixed liquor samples were suddenly isolated from their normally continuous source of feed. OUR rates for sludge samples maintained in the completely mixed bench‐scale respirometer decreased by as much as 42% in less than two minuts after feeding was stopped. Based on these results, BOD bottle‐based OUR results should not be used in any complete mix‐activated sludge process operational control strategy, process mass balance, or system evaluation procedure requiring absolute accuracy of OUR values.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Albertson, O. E., and DiGregorio, D. (1975). “Biologically mediated inconsistencies in aeration equipment performance.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 47(5), 976–988.
2.
Alleman, J. E. (1978). “Nitrogen removal from wastewaters using sequencing batch reactors,” thesis presented to the University of Notre Dame, at Notre Dame, Ind., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
3.
Benefield, L. D., et al. (1975). “Process control by oxygen uptake and solids analysis.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 47(10), 2498–2503.
4.
Blok, J. (1976). “Measurements of the viable biomass concentration in activated sludge by respirometric techniques.” Water Res., 10(10), 919–925.
5.
Chandra, S., et al. (1987). “Evaluation of oxygen uptake rate as an activated sludge process control parameter.” Proc. 19th Mid‐Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference, Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, Pa., 51–77.
6.
“Development of standard procedures for evaluating oxygen transfer devices.” (1983). EPA‐600/2‐83‐102, Municipal Envir. Res. Lab., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
7.
Ekama, G. A., and Marais, G. v. R. (1978). “Adsorption in the activated sludge process.” Water S.A., 4(1), 39–48.
8.
Fukui, S. (1986). “Significant energy saving for aeration system—Study on aeration performance in deep tanks,” paper presented at 59th Annual Conf., Water Pollution Control Federation, Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 1–21.
9.
Giona, A. R., and Annesini, M. C. (1979). “Oxygen uptake in the activated sludge process.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 51(5), 1009–1016.
10.
Haas, C. N. (1979). “Oxygen uptake as an oxygen uptake control parameter.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 51(5), 938–943.
11.
Huang, J. Y. C. (1982). “Microorganism viability.” Application of on‐line analytical instrumentation to process control, R. M. Arthur, ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Mich., 81–104.
12.
Huang, J. Y. C., and Cheng, M. D. (1984). “Measurements and new applications of oxygen uptake rates in the activated sludge process.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 56(3), 259–265.
13.
King, E. F., and Dutka, B. J. (1986). “Respirometric techniques.” Toxicity testing using microorganisms—Volume I, G. Bitton and B. J. Dutka, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 75–113.
14.
Linne, S. R., et al. (1989). “The impact of selector operation on activated sludge settleability and nitrification: Pilot‐scale results.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 61(1), 66–72.
15.
McKinney, R. E., and Stukenberg, J. R. (1979). “On site evaluation: Steady state vs. non‐steady state testing.” Proceedings—Workshop Toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard (EPA‐600/9‐78‐021), W. C. Boyle, ed., Municipal Envir. Lab., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 195–204.
16.
Miller, G. (1979). “Single‐cell sequencing batch treatment of rural domestic waste‐water—Utilization of soluble and particulate fractions of sewage,” thesis presented to the University of Notre Dame, at Notre Dame, Ind., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
17.
Mines, R. O., and Sherrad, J. H. (1987). “Biological enhancement of oxygen transfer in the activated sludge process.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 59(1), 19–24.
18.
Mueller, J. A., and Stensel, H. D. (1987). “Biologically enhanced oxygen transfer in the activated sludge process—Fact or folly?” paper presented at 60th Annual Conf., Water Pollution Control Federation, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct., 1–26.
19.
Randall, C. W., et al. (1987). “Factors affecting anaerobic stabilization during biological phosphorus removal.” Biological Phosphate Removal From Wastewaters, R. Ramadori, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 111–122.
20.
Redmon, D. T., et al. (1983). “Oxygen transfer efficiency measurements in mixed liquor using off‐gas techniques.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 55(11), 1338–1347.
21.
Rieth, M. G., and Polta, R. C. (1986). “Process water oxygen transfer comparisons between full‐scale coarse and fine bubble aeration systems,” paper presented at 59th Annual Conf. Water Pollution Control Federation, Los Angeles, Calif., Oct., 1–36.
22.
Rieth, M. G., and Polta, R. C. (1987). “A test protocol for aeration retrofit to fine bubble diffusers,” paper presented at 60th Annual Conf., Water Pollution Control Federation, Philadelphia, Pa., Oct., 1–32.
23.
Rieth, M. G., et al. (1988). “Effects of selected design parameters on the fouling of ceramic diffusers,” paper presented at 61st Annual Conf., Water Pollution Control Federation, Dallas, Tex., Oct., 1–29.
24.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. (1985). 16th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
25.
Summer, S. M., et al. (1982). “Real‐time monitoring of biomass respiration.” Application of on‐line analytical instrumentation to process control, R. M. Arthu, ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Mich., 81–104.
26.
Vargas‐Lopez, C. E., et al., (1989). “Discussion: Evaluation of oxygen uptake rate as an activated sludge process control parameter.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 61(1), 99–102.
27.
Weddle, C. L., and Jenkins, D. (1971). “The viability of activated sludge.” Water Res., 5(8), 621–640.
28.
Zickefoose, C. S. (1981). “Activated sludge troubleshooting at the Pullman, Washington WWTP.” Water Pollut. Control Fed. Highlights, 18(1), 9–12.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 3 • May 1990
Pages: 472 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1990
Published in print: May 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.