Generating Designs for Wastewater Systems
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 5
Abstract
Optimization models have been used in the preliminary design of wastewater treatment systems to obtain a least cost design. However, this may not produce the best design if other unmodeled issues and incomplete information of the cost and performance data of the treatment processes are considered. Optimization models may be more useful in the design of wastewater treatment systems, if they can be used to generate “good” but “different” design alternatives for evaluation. A study was conducted to examine two modeling‐to‐generate‐alternatives (MGA) methods (the generating and screening, G&S, method and the efficient random generation, ERG, method) for the purpose of generating good and different preliminary designs for a typical wastewater treatment system design problem. The results showed that various attractive designs, which are good with respect to the objectives specified but widely different with respect to the treatment processes, could be generated by the two MGA methods. In comparing the alternatives produced by the two methods with those derived from the original optimization model and a constraint method, it was found that the MGA methods were more effective for the development of various preliminary wastewater treatment system designs, which not only met minimal requirements but were also widely different from each other.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adams, B. J., and Panagiotakopoulos, D., “Network Approach to Optimal Wastewater Treatment System Design,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 49(4), April, 1977, pp. 623–632.
2.
Bell, D. E., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1977.
3.
Berthouex, P. M., and Polkowski, L. B., “Optimum Waste Treatment Plant Design Under Uncertainty,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 42(9), Sept., 1970, pp. 1589–1613.
4.
Bowden, K., Gale, R. S., and Wright, D. E., “Evaluation of the CIRIA Prototype Model for the Design of Sewage Treatment Works,” Water Pollution Control, 75(2), Feb., 1976, pp. 192–205.
5.
Brill, E. D., Jr., “The Use of Optimization Model in Public Planning,” Management Science, 25(5), 1979, pp. 413–422.
6.
Brill, E. D., Jr., Chang, S. Y., and Hopkins, L. D., “Modeling to Generate Alternatives: The HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning,” Management Science, 28(3), Mar., 1982, pp. 221–235.
7.
Chang, S. Y., “Methods for Generating Alternative Solutions for Environmental Planning Problems,” thesis presented to the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, at Urbana, Ill., in 1981, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
8.
Chang, S. Y., Brill, E. D., Jr., and Hopkins, L. D., “Use of Mathematical Models to Generate Alternative Solutions to Water Resources Planning Problems,” Water Resources Research, 18(1), Feb., 1982, pp. 58–64.
9.
Chang, S. Y., Brill, E. D., Jr., and Hopkins, L. D., “Efficient Random Generation of Feasible Alternatives: A Land Use Example,” Journal of Reg, Sci., 22(3), Aug., 1982, pp. 303–314.
10.
Chang, S. Y., Brill, E. D., Jr., and Hopkins, L. D., “Modeling to Generate Alternatives: A Fuzzy Approach,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 9(2), Feb., 1983.
11.
Chang, S. Y., and Liaw, S. L., “Use of Optimization Models to Generate Designs Alternatives to Wastewater Treatment Systems,” Weldon Spring Project Report, University of Missouri‐Rolla, Rolla, Mo., July, 1984.
12.
Chang, S. Y., and Liaw, S. L., “Evaluation of Methods for Generating Alternatives to Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems,” Environment and Planning B, 11, 1984, pp. 325–337.
13.
Churchman, C. W., The Systems Approach, Dell Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., 1968.
14.
Craig, E. W., Meredith, D. D., and Middleton, A. C., “Algorithm for Optimal Activated Sludge Design,” Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. EE6, Dec., 1978, pp. 1101–1117.
15.
Dick, R.I., and Simmons, D. L., “Optimal Integration of Processes for Sludge Management,” Proceedings, 3rd National Conference on Sludge Management Disposal and Utilization, Miami Beach, Fla., 1976.
16.
Ecker, J. G., and McNamara, J. R., “Geometric Programming and the Preliminary Design of Industrial Waste Treatment Plants,” Water Resources Research, 7(1), Feb., 1971, pp. 18–22.
17.
Eilers, R. G., and Smith, R., “The Role of Computer Programs in Preliminary Design,” Short Course Proceedings Applications of Computer Programs in the Preliminary Design of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Section 1, Workshop Lectures, EPA‐600/2‐78‐185a, Sept., 1978.
18.
Eilers, R. G., et al., “Applications of Computer Programs in the Preliminary Design of Wastewater Treatment Facilities—Section II,” EPA‐600/2‐78‐185b, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, Ohio, Sept., 1978.
19.
Evenson, D. E., Orlob, G. T., and Monser, J. R., “Preliminary Selection of Waste Treatment Systems,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 41(11), Nov., 1969, pp. 1845–1858.
20.
Geoffrion, A. M., “The Purpose of Mathematical Programming is Insight, Not Numbers,” Interfaces, 7(1), Nov., 1976, pp. 81–92.
21.
Grady, C. P. L., Jr., “Simplified Optimization of Activated Sludge Process,” Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. EE3, June, 1977, pp. 413–429.
22.
Hamming, R. W., Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw‐Hill, 1962.
23.
Kshirsagar, S. R., “Ideation and Evaluation in Environmental Planning,” thesis presented to the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, at Urbana, Ill., in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
24.
Lynn, W. K., Logan, J. A., and Charnes, A., “Systems Analysis for Planning Wastewater Treatment Plants,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 34(6), June, 1962, pp. 565–579.
25.
Middleton, A. C., and Lawrence, A. W., “Least Cost Design of Activated Sludge Systems,” Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 48(5), May, 1976, pp. 889–905.
26.
Mishra, P. N., Ran, L. T., and Erickson, L. E., “Biological Wastewater Treatment System Design, Part I. Optimal Synthesis,” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 51(6), Dec., 1973, pp. 694–701.
27.
Parkin, G. F., and Dague, R. R., “.Optimal Design of Wastewater Treatment Systems by Enumeration,” Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SA6, Dec., 1972, pp. 833–851.
28.
Patterson, K. E., “Dynamic Programming Approach to Cost‐Effective Wastewater Treatment Alternative Selection,” paper presented at the October 3–8, 1976, 49th Water Pollution Control Federation Annual Conference, held at Minneapolis, Minn.
29.
Rossman, L. A., “Computer‐Aided Synthesis of Wastewater Treatment and Sludge Disposal Systems,” EPA‐600/2‐79‐158, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, Dec., 1979.
30.
Rossman, L. A., “Synthesis of Waste Treatment Systems of Implicit Enumeration,” Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 52(1), Jan., 1980, pp. 148–160.
31.
Rossman, L. A., EXEC/OP Reference Manual, Version 1.2, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, Feb., 1980.
32.
Shih, C. S., and Krishnan, P., “Dynamic Optimization for Industrial Waste Treatment Design,” Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 41(10), Oct., 1969, pp. 1787–1802.
33.
Shih, C. S., and DeFilippi, J. A., “System Optimization of Waste Treatment Plant Process Design,” Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SA2, Apr., 1970, pp. 409–421.
34.
Smith, D. W., “Computer Design of CMAS Systems,” Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SA4, Aug., 1970, pp. 977–990.
35.
Tyteca, D., “Nonlinear Programming Model of Wastewater Treatment Plant,” Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. EE4, Aug., 1981, pp. 747–766.
36.
Tyteca, D., and Smeers, Y., “Nonlinear Programming Design of Wastewater Treatment Plant,” Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. EE4, Aug., 1981, pp. 767–779.
37.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “Computer Assisted Procedure for the Design and Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Systems (CAPDET),” Draft Report, Office of the Chief of Engineers, Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, 1976.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 111 • Issue 5 • October 1985
Pages: 665 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1985
Published in print: Oct 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.