Reservoir Modeling to Develop AWT Nitrate Standard
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 109, Issue 6
Abstract
A continuous simulation reservoir model was used to develop streamflow‐related effluent standards for nitrate‐N discharges into a water supply impoundment. The nitrogen removal standard for advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) plant represents relaxation of year‐round 1.0 mg/L total N effluent standard intended for lake eutrophication management. During years with average or above‐average streamflow conditions, AWT discharges must reach 40 mgd before even limited AWT nitrogen removal operations may be necessary to meet the reservoir's 5 mg/L nitrate‐N standard. During years with relatively low streamflows, the 5 mg/L nitrate‐N standard can be met with limited or no AWT nitrogen removal operations by a 10 mgd discharge while extensive nitrogen removal operations during most or all of the low flow period are typically required for discharges in excess of 20 mgd Streamflow‐related effluent standard and AWT operating rule curves permit annual operation and maintenance cost‐savings of approximately one to two million dollars, depending upon AWT discharge and streamflows, and deferral of nitrogen removal unit expansion for 10–15 years.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Follow‐up Assessments of Alternate AWT Operating Rules with Occoquan Basin Computer Model,” Northern Virginia Planning District Commision, prepared for Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., Boston, Mass., Feb., 1980.
2.
Grizzard, T. J., Hartigan, J. P., and Randall, C. W., “The Development of Water Quality Management Plans Using Data from Automatic Stormwater Monitoring Networks,” Water Science Technology, Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 95–102.
3.
Hartigan, J. P., et al., “Calibration of Urban Nonpoint Pollution Loading Models,” Proceedings of ASCE Hydraulics Division Specialty Conference on Verification of Mathematical and Physical Models in Hydraulic Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y., Aug., 1978, pp. 363–372.
4.
Hartigan, J. P., Quasebarth, T. F., and Southerland, E., “Use of Continuous Simulation Model Calibration Techniques to Develop Nonpoint Pollution Loading Factors,” Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Management Modeling Users Group Meeting: March 25–26, 1982, EPA‐600/9‐82‐015, USEPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Ga., 1982, pp. 101–127.
5.
Hollander, M., and Wolfe, D. A., Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1973.
6.
Hydrocomp, Inc., “Hydrocomp Simulation Programming: Water Quality Simulation Operations Manual,” Palo Alto, Calif., 1977.
7.
Johanson, R. C., Imhoff, J. C., and Davis, H. H., “Users Manual for Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF),” EPA‐600/9‐80‐015, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Ga., Apr., 1980.
8.
“The Occoquan Annual Report: 1979,” Occoquan Watershed Monitoring Laboratory, Vol. VIII, Manassas, Va., Jan., 1981.
9.
“Occoquan Basin Computer Model: Summary of Calibration Results,” Northern Virginia Planning District Commission, Falls Church, Va., Jan., 1979.
10.
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., “1969 Occoquan Reservoir Study,” prepared for Virginia State Water Control Board, Richmond, Va., Apr., 1970.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1983
Published in print: Dec 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.