Management of On‐Site Disposal Systems: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 109, Issue 4
Abstract
This case study presents the methodology for collecting and interpreting the data for assessing the correlations among variables (required pumping frequency, user satisfaction, management district preference, user knowledge, and unit type). The chi‐square distribution technique is employed to evaluate the significance of correlations. This technique unveils the reasons why the homeowners are satisfied with their units and prefer a specific approach for operating and maintaining their units. This study also provides information about management functions performed by the typical county institutions, type and estimated number of on‐site systems in use and failing, causes of system failures, and approaches for mitigating failing systems. The methodology developed for conducting the investigation and for interpreting the data can be used in any other region, and the result provides valuable information to practicing engineers in conducting facility planning for rural communities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Batz, M. R., “Operation and Maintenance Function of an On‐Site Wastewater Management District,” Proceedings, Sixth National Converence on Individual On‐Site Wastewater Systems, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1979.
2.
“Community‐Managed Septic Systems—A Viable Alternative to Sewage Treatment Plants,” U.S. General Accounting Office, Report to the Congress of the United States, 1978.
3.
Edwards, A. L., Statistical Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, Rinehart & Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., 1958.
4.
“Management of On‐Site and Small Community Wastewater Systems,” Interim Study Report Prepared for Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Weston, R. F., Inc., United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, Nov., 1979.
5.
Otis, R. J., “An Alternative Public Wastewater Facility for a Small Rural Community,” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisc., 1978.
6.
Otis, R. J., and Stewart, D. E., “Alternative Wastewater Facilities for Small Unsewered Communities in Rural America,” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisc., 1976.
7.
“Public Management On‐Site Wastewater Systems—An Explanation of Senate Bill 430, California State Water Resources Board, Sacramento, Calif., Jan., 1978.
8.
“A Regional Water Quality Management Plan for Southeastern Wisconsin‐2000,” Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Planning Report, Vol. 1, No. 30, 1978.
9.
“Stinson Beach Wastewater Facilities Planning Study Project Report,” Eutek, Inc., Technical Report to Stinson Beach, Calif., Apr., 1977.
10.
Wheeler, G., and Bennett, J., “The Campaign in California for Alternative Systems,” Proceedings, Fifth National Conference on Individual On‐Site Wastewater Systems, pp. 83–94, 1978.
11.
Wheeler, G., and Bennett, J., “On‐Site Wastewater Management District in California,” Presented at the Alternative Wastewater Treatment Systems Workshop, Champaign, Ill., 1979.
12.
Wilson, G. E., Huang, J. Y. C., Tchobanoglous, G., and Wheeler, G., “Managed On‐Site Disposal in Unsewered Areas,” Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 583–596, June, 1979.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 109 • Issue 4 • August 1983
Pages: 845 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1983
Published in print: Aug 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.