Relationship between Changes in Material Technology and Construction Productivity
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 4
Abstract
There have been substantial changes in both material technology and construction productivity over the past several decades. By analyzing the changes in both material technology and productivity among 100 construction activities from 1977 to 2004, this research examines the strength and types of relationships that exist within these two occurrences. Through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analyses, the researchers found that activities experiencing significant changes in material technology have also experienced substantially greater long-term improvements in both their labor and partial factor productivity. The research did find that a stronger relationship exists between changes in material technology and partial factor productivity than in labor productivity. The research also found that changes in the unit weight of materials had a significant relationship to labor productivity, while changes in installation and modularity had a significant relationship to partial factor productivity. The research findings will help industry practitioners to better understand how they may leverage technology to improve construction productivity, while also helping researchers understand the theoretical relationships between technology and construction productivity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allen, S. G. (1985). “Why construction industry productivity is declining.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 117(4), 661–665.
Bernstein, H. (2003). “Measuring productivity: An industry challenge.” Civ. Eng. (N.Y.), 73(12), 46–52.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2006). United States Dept. of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, ⟨www.bls.gov⟩ (July 28, 2006).
Business Roundtable (BRT). (1983). “More construction for the money: Summary report of the construction industry cost effectiveness project.” Rep., The Business Roundtable, New York.
Dacy, D. (1965). “Productivity and price trends in construction since 1947.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 47(4), 406–411.
Goodrum, P., and Haas, C. (2002) “Partial factor productivity and equipment technology change at the activity level in the U.S. construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(6), 463–472.
Goodrum, P., and Haas, C. (2004). “The long-term impact of equipment technology on labor productivity in the U.S. construction Industry at the activity level.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(1), 124–131.
Goodrum, P., Haas, C., and Glover, R. (2002). “The divergence in aggregate and activity estimates of U.S. construction productivity.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(5), 415–423.
Gordon, R. (1968). “A new view of real investment in structures, 1919–1966.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 50(4), 417–428.
Grogan, T. (2006). “Inflation maintains strong momentum.” Eng. News-Rec., 256(25), 67.
Gullickson, W., and Harper, M. (2002). “Bias in aggregate productivity trends revisited.” Monthly labor review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March, 32–40.
Hassell, S., Florence, S., and Ettedgui, E. (2001). Summary of federal construction, building, and housing related research & development in FY1999, RAND’s Science and Technology Policy Institute, Santa Monica, Calif.
Henshell, J., and Griffin, C. (2000). The manual of below-grade waterproofing systems, Wiley, New York.
Koch, J., and Moavenzadeh, F. (1979). “Productivity and technology in construction.” J. Constr. Div., 105(4), 351–366.
O’Connor, J., and Yang, L. (2004). “Project performance versus use of technologies at project and phase levels.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(3), 322–329
Pieper, P. (1990). “The measurement of construction prices: Retrospect and prospect.” Fifty years of economic measurement: The jubilee of the conference on research in income and wealth, E. Berndt and J. Triplet, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rosefielde, S., and Mills, D. (1979). “Is construction technologically stagnant?” The construction industry: Balance wheel of the economy, J. Lange and D. Mills, eds., Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., 90.
Rossow, J. (1977). “The Role of technology in the productivity in highway construction in the United States.” Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Salter, W. (1966). Productivity and technical change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Stokes, H. (1981). “An examination of the productivity decline in the construction industry.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 63(4), 495–502.
Teicholz, P. (2000). “Productivity trends in the construction industry.” Proc., 2000 AISC Annual Convention, San Francisco.
Thomas, H., and Yiakoumis, I. (1987). “Factor model of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 113(4), 626–644.
Thomas, R. H., et al. (1990). “Modeling construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(4), 705–726.
Tuchman, J. (2003). “Accurate productivity measures are elusive.” Eng. News-Rec., 250(18), 10.
Tuchman, J. (2004). “Study concludes productivity is up, just not enough.” Eng. News-Rec., 253(1), 18.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135 • Issue 4 • April 2009
Pages: 278 - 287
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 2, 2008
Accepted: Oct 15, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.