TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2008

Heterogeneous Approach to Modeling Contractors' Decision-to-Bid Strategies

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134, Issue 10

Abstract

This research is based on the premise that there is heterogeneity in the population of contractors, i.e., that individual contractors exhibit different bidding behavior when confronted with a given set of bidding variables. Random-coefficients logistic model is used to explicitly measure the heterogeneity across contractors in terms of their (1) intrinsic bid/no-bid preferences and (2) responses to four bidding variables, i.e., number of bidders, market conditions, project type, and size. The binary bid/no-bid decisions were assumed to arise from a logistic model, but with the model parameters that varied between contractors. Data were gathered using a bidding experiment involving Hong Kong and Singapore contractors. The results show that there is significant heterogeneity across the contractors in which Hong Kong contractors can be clustered into four groups of identical (statistical) behavior in response to the four bidding variables, whereas in Singapore, there are only three groups as determined by the underlying heterogeneity distribution. This probabilistic classification of contractors has implications for contractors’ competitive strategies by targeting different groups of competitors toward maximum competitiveness.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Research Grant Council, University Grants Committee of Hong Kong, through Grant No. CityU 1129/02E. The writers are indebted to anonymous respondents in the bidding experiment for their invaluable responses that formed the basis for empirical analysis in this study. Thanks also go to the National University Singapore for provision of study facilities to carry out data collection in Singapore.

References

Ahmad, I. (1990). “Decision-support system for modeling bid/no-bid decision problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(4), 595–608.
Ahmad, I., and Minkarah, I. (1988). “Questionnaire survey on bidding in construction.” J. Manage. Eng., 4(3), 229–243.
Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2005). BCA contractors registry, Singapore.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
De Neufville, R., Lesage, Y., and Hani, E. N. (1977). “Bidding models: Effects of bidders’ risk aversion.” J. Constr. Div., 103(1), 57–70.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, R. B. (1977). “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 39(1), 1–38.
Drew, D., and Skitmore, M. (2006). “Testing Vickery’s revenue equivalence theory in construction auctions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(4), 425–428.
Dyer, D. (1987). “An experimental analysis of auction theory.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, Houston.
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau (ETWB). (2005). List of approved contractors for public works, Hong Kong.
Fayek, A., Ghoshal, I., and AbouRizk, S. (1999). “A survey of the bidding practices of Canadian civil engineering construction contractors.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 26(1), 13–25.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4(1), 104–112.
Gonzalez-Diaz, M., Arrunada, B., and Fernandez, A. (2000). “Causes of subcontracting: Evidence from panel data on construction firms.” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 42(2), 167–187.
Hackemer, G. C. (1970). “Profit and competition: Estimating and bidding.” Build. Technol. Manage., Dec., 6–7.
Han, S. H., Diekmann, J. E., and Ock, J. H. (2005). “Contractor’s risk attitudes in the selection of international construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(3), 283–292.
Hillebrandt, P. M. (2000). Economic theory and the construction industry, Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Jain, D. C., Vilcassim, N. J., and Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). “A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data.” J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 12(3), 317–328.
Kagel, J. H., and Levin, D. (2002). Common value auctions and the winner’s curse, Princeton University Press, Oxfordshire, N.J.
Kamakura, W. A. and Russell, G. J. (1989). “A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure.” J. Mark. Res., 26(4), 379–390.
Lin, C. T., and Chen, Y. T. (2004). “Bid/no-bid decision-making—A fuzzy linguistic approach.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(7), 585–593.
Liu, M., and Ling, Y. Y. (2005). “Modeling a contractor’s markup estimation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(4), 391–399.
Liu, S., Wang, S., and Lai, K. K. (1999). “A multiple attribute decision approach for bid/no-bid decisions.” Int. J. Oper. Quant Manage., 5(1), 1–10.
Lo, H. P., and Lam, S. P. W. (2001). “A latent class model applied to stated preference data.” Travel behaviour research: The leading edge, D. A. Hensher, ed., Pergamon, New York, 425–438.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorial and limited dependent variables, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Louis, T. A. (1982). “Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 44(2), 226–233.
Lowe, D. J., and Parvar, J. (2004). “A logistic regression approach to modelling the contractor’s decision to bid.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 22(6), 643–653.
Lowe, D. J., Parvar, J., and Emsley, M. W. (2004). “Development of a decision support system (DSS) for the contractor’s decision to bid: Regression and neural networks solutions.” J. Finan. Mange. Property Constr., 9(1), 27–42.
Male, S. (1991a). “Strategic management in construction: Conceptual foundations.” Competitive advantage in construction, S. Male and R. Stocks, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K., 1–4.
Male, S. (1991b). “Strategic management for competitive strategy and advantages.” Competitive advantage in construction, S. Male and R. Stocks, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K., 5–44.
McLachlan, G., and Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions, Wiley, New York.
Newcombe, R. (1990). Construction management 1: Organization systems, Mitchell, London.
Odusote, O. O., and Fellows, R. F. (1992). “An examination of the importance of resource considerations when contractors make project selection decisions.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 10(2), 137–151.
Oo, B. L., Drew, D., and Lo, H. P. (2007). “Applying a random coefficients logistic model to contractors’ decision to bid.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 25(4), 387–398.
Pampel, F. C. (2000) Logistic regression: A primer, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Rossi, P. E., and Allenby, G. M. (1993). “A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters.” J. Mark. Res., 30(2), 171–182.
Runeson, G., and Skitmore, M. (1999). “Tendering theory revisited.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 17(3), 285–296.
Shash, A. A. (1993). “Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 11(2), 111–118.
Skitmore, M. (1989). Contract bidding in construction, Longman, Harlow.
Skitmore, M. (1991). “The construction contract bidder homogeneity assumption: An empirical test.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 9(5), 403–429.
Thorpe, T., and McCaffer, R. (1991). “Competitive bidding and tendering policies.” Competitive advantage in construction, S. Male and R. Stocks, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K., 163–194.
Verbeke, G., and Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data, Springer, New York.
Wanous, M., Boussabaine, H. A., and Lewis, J. (2003). “A neural network bid/no bid model: The case for contractors in Syria.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21(7), 737–744.
Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business research methods, South-Western, Mason, Ohio.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134Issue 10October 2008
Pages: 766 - 775

History

Received: May 15, 2007
Accepted: Mar 6, 2008
Published online: Oct 1, 2008
Published in print: Oct 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Sydney, NSW, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Derek S. Drew [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Management Sciences, Hong Kong City Univ., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share