Abstract
Researchers find that the successful implementation of information systems that span organizational boundaries enhances competitive advantage. However, the process by which networks of design and construction firms implement boundary-spanning technological changes remains poorly understood. In this paper I explore the implementation of three-dimensional computer-aided design tools in 26 design and construction organizations. I analyze empirical data collected over a period to induce a set of antecedent constructs that enable the evolution from “printed sets of plans” to “virtual model” boundary objects. The findings highlight the importance of addressing regulative, technological, work, and organizational issues at the interfaces between design and construction firms when implementing boundary-spanning technological changes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Stanford University Center for Integrated Facility Engineering 2005 Seed Research Grant entitled “Organizing to Exploit Integrated Information Technologies,” by the Stanford University Gerald J. Lieberman Fellowship, and by the Technical Research Center of Finland (VTT). In additional to acknowledging financial support, the writer also wishes to thank Ray Levitt, Bob Tatum, and Tapio Koivu for their input and support, as well as the companies that participated in this research investigation.
References
Bakos, J. (1997). “Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces.” Manage. Sci., 43(12), 1676–1692.
Barron, C. (2003). The Graphisoft virtual building: Bringing the building information model from concept into reality, Graphisoft, Inc., White Paper, Newton, Mass.
Bechky, B. (2003). “Sharing meaning across occupational boundaries: The transformation of understanding on a product floor.” Org. Sci., 14(3), 312–330.
Briers, M., and Chua, W. (2001). “The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: A field study of an implementation of activity-based costing.” Account., Organis., Soc., 26(3), 237–269.
Carlile, P. (2002). “A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development.” Org. Sci., 13(4), 442–455.
Cash, J., and Konsynski, B. (1985). “IS redraws competitive boundaries.” Harvard Bus. Rev., 63(2), 134–142.
Davenport, T. (1998). “Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.” Harvard Bus. Rev., 76(4), 121–131.
Dunteman, G. (1989). Principal components analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. (1991). “Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 16(3), 620–627.
Gallaher, M., O’Connor, A., Dettbarn, J., and Gilday, L. (2004). Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the U.S. capital facilities industry, U.S. Department of Commerce Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, New York.
Harty, C. (2005). “Innovation in construction: A sociology of technology approach.” Build. Res. Inf., 33(6), 512–522.
Henderson, K. (1991). “Flexible sketches and inflexible databases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering.” Sci. Technol. Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.
Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture and computer graphics in design engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Johnston, H., and Vitale, M. (1988). “Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems.” MIS Q., 12(2), 153–165.
Kale, S., and Arditi, D. (2005). “Diffusion of computer aided design technology in architectural design practice.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(10), 1135–1141.
Levina, N., and Vaast, E. (2005). “The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for information systems’ implementation and use.” MIS Q., 29(2), 335–363.
Malone, M., Yates, J., and Benjamin, R. (1987). “Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies.” Commun. ACM, 30(6), 484–497.
Manske, F., and Wolf, H. (1989). “Design work in change: Social conditions and results of CAD use in mechanical engineering.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 36(4), 282–292.
Mitropoulos, P., and Tatum, C. (1999). “Technology adoption decisions in construction organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 330–338.
Pawlowski, S., and Robey, D. (2004). “Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals.” MIS Q., 28(4), 645–672.
Robertson, D., and Allen, T. (1992). “Managing CAD systems in mechanical design engineering.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 39(1), 22–31.
Salter, A., and Gann, D. (2003). “Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design.” Res. Policy, 32(8), 1309–1324.
Salzman, H. (1989). “Computer-aided design: Limitations in automating design and drafting.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 36(4), 252–261.
Star, S., and Griesemer, J. (1989). “Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.
Sumner, M. (2000). “Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects.” J. Inf. Tech., 15(4), 317–327.
Taylor, J., and Levitt, R. (2004). “Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries.” Innovations: Project management research 2004, D. Slevin, D. Cleland, and J. Pinto, eds., Project Management Institute, Newton Square, Pa., 83–99.
Whyte, J., Bouchlaghem, N., Thorpe, A., and McCaffer, R. (1999). “A survey of CAD and virtual reality within the house building industry.” New Ideas Psychol., 6(4), 371–379.
Yin, R. (1989). Case study research, design and methods, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133 • Issue 12 • December 2007
Pages: 993 - 1002
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 14, 2006
Accepted: Mar 26, 2007
Published online: Dec 1, 2007
Published in print: Dec 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.