TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2007

Gates’ Bidding Model

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133, Issue 11

Abstract

In evaluating closed-bid competitive procurement auctions, the most crucial issue is to determine the probability of placing a winning bid for a given markup level. There has long been disagreement on how this should be done due to the absence of a mathematical derivation of one of the main evaluation techniques—Gates’ method. Gates’ method is shown in this paper to be valid if, and only if, bids can be described using the proportional hazards family of statistical distributions. When markup values are included in Gates’ method, it is seen that the underlying statistical distribution required for the method to work is closely related to the Weibull distribution. Likelihood based methods are suggested for parameter estimation and an illustrative example is provided by analysis of Shaffer and Micheau's 1971 construction contract bidding data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

R. McVinish was supported by ARC Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDCEO348165.

References

Abernathy, R. B. (2000). The new Weibull handbook, 4th Ed., ISBN 0-9653062-1-6.
Athey, S., Levin, J., and Seira, E. (2004). “Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Theory and evidence from timber auctions.” Mimeo, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Bapna, R., Jank, W., and Shmueli, G. (2006). “Consumer surplus in on-line auctions.” Mimeo, Univ. of Minesota, Minneapolis.
Benjamin, N. B. H. (1969). “Competitive bidding for building construction contracts.” Technical Rep. No. 106, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Crowley, L. G. (2000). “Friedman and Gates—Another look.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 306–312.
Donald, S. G., Paarsch, H. J., and Robert, J. (1997). “Identification, estimation and testing in empirical models of sequential, ascending price auctions with multiunit demand: An application to Siberian timber export permits.” Working Paper, Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Elköf, M., and Lunander, A. (1998). “Contract bidding under a first-price sealed bid auction—An empirical analysis of competition in procurement of road markings in Sweden.” Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden.
Englebrecht-Wiggans, R. (1980). “Auctions and bidding models: Asurvey.” Manage. Sci., 26(2), 119–42.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 1(4), 104–112.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities.” J. Constr. Div., 93, 75–107.
Gates, M. (1976). “Discussion of bidding models: ‘Truths and comments.’” J. Constr. Div., 102(4), 696.
Gnedenko, B. V. (1970). “Limit theorems for sums of random number of positive independent random variables.” Proc., 6th Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statistics Probability, Vol. 2, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 537–549.
Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of extremes, Columbia University Press, New York.
Haile, P. A. (2001). “Auctions with resale markets: an application of USA forest timber sales.” Am. Econ. Rev., 91(3), 399–427.
Jofre-Bonet, M., and Pesendorfer, M. (2003). “Estimation of a dynamic auction game.” Econometrica, 71(5), 1443–1489.
Keefer, D. L., Beckley Smith F., Jr., and Back, H. B. (1991). “Development and use of a modeling system to aid a major oil company in allocating bid capital.” Oper. Res., 39(1), 28–41.
Klambauer, G. (1975). Mathematical analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Lundander, A. (2002). “Procurement bidding in first-price and second-price sealed bid auctions within the common value paradigm.” Comput. Econ., 19(2), 227–244.
Marion, J. (2004a). “Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions.” Working Paper, Dept. of Economics, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, Calif.
Marion, J. (2004b) “Redistribution through public purchases: competition, procurement cost and efficiency of a bid program.” Mimeo, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago.
Marshall, R. C., Rai, M. E., Richard, J.-F., and Schulenberg, S. P. (2001). “The impact of cost synergies on bidding in the Georgia school milk market.” Working Paper, Penn State Univ., Borough of State College, Pa.
Paarsch, H. J. (1992). “Empirical methods of auctions and an application to British Columbian timber sales.” Research Rep. No. 9212, Univ. of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
Paarsch, H. J. (1997). “Deriving an estimate of the optimal reserve price: an application to British Columbian timber sales.” J. Econometr., 78(2), 333–357.
Pettitt, A. N. (1986). “Rank likelihood.” Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson, eds., Vol. 7, Wiley, New York.
Rosenshine, M. (1972). “Bidding models: Resolution of a controversy.” J. Constr. Div., 98(1), 143–148.
Rothkopf, M. H. (1969). “A model of rational competitive bidding.” Manage. Sci., 15, 362–73.
Rothkopf, M. H. (1980a). “Equilibrium linear bidding strategies.” Oper. Res., 28, 576–83.
Rothkopf, M. H. (1980b). “On multiplicative bidding strategies.” Oper. Res., 28, 570–75.
Rothkopf, M. H., and Harstad, R. M. (1994). “Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay.” Manage. Sci., 40(3), 364–84.
Rothkopf, M. H., Harstad, R. M., and Yuhong, F. (2003). “Is subsidizing inefficient bidders actually costly?” Manage. Sci., 49, 71–84.
Sareen, S. (1999). “Posterior odds comparison of symmetric low-price, sealed-bid auctions within the common-value and the independent-private-values paradigm.” J. Appl. Econ., 14, 651–676.
Shaffer, L. R., and Micheau, T. W. (1971). “Bidding with competitive strategy models.” J. Constr. Div., 97(1) 113–126.
Skitmore, R. M. (1991). “The contract bidder homogeneity assumption: An empirical analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 9(5), 403–429.
Skitmore, R. M., and Pemberton, J. (1994). “A multivariate approach to contract bidding markup strategies.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 45(12), 1263–1272.
Smiley, A. K. (1980). Competitive bidding under uncertainty: The case of off-shore oil, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass.
Stark, R. M. (1968). “Discussion of ‘Bidding strategies and probabilities.’” J. Constr. Div., 94(1) 110–112.
Wilson, R. (1979). “Auctions of shares.” Quart. J. Econom., 93(4), 675–689.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133Issue 11November 2007
Pages: 855 - 863

History

Received: May 18, 2006
Accepted: Mar 14, 2007
Published online: Nov 1, 2007
Published in print: Nov 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. Martin Skitmore [email protected]
Ph.D
Queensland Univ. of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane Q4001, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Anthony N. Pettitt
Ph.D
Queensland Univ. of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane Q4001, Australia.
Ross McVinish
Ph.D
Queensland Univ. of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane Q4001, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share