TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2006

Contractor Selection Criteria: Investigation of Opinions of Singapore Construction Practitioners

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 9

Abstract

The construction industry has witnessed the failure of many contractors due to varying reasons such as financial problems, poor performance, or accidents arising from the lack of adequate safety consideration at worksites. All these incidents have led to the impression that the current system of awarding the contracts is inefficient in selecting the contractor capable of meeting the demands and challenges of present times and hence needs to be reviewed accordingly. Therefore, in an attempt to investigate the current situation of the Singapore construction industry a questionnaire survey was conducted for accruing the data required to identify the important contractor selection criteria (CSC) and to draw upon construction practitioners’ opinions regarding the importance of those CSC in assessing the capabilities of the candidate contractors during the selection process. The research reported upon forms part of a larger study that aims to develop a computer-interactive multicriteria decision system for contractor selection involving identification of CSC for inclusion in the system, investigation of CSC preferences of construction practitioners, and establishment of weights for those CSC from their perceived importance determined through the questionnaire survey of Singapore construction practitioners. The study highlights that there are statistically significant differences in opinions regarding the degree of importance assigned to some CSC among public clients, private clients, and contractors. Findings from the study may act as an aid in improving the Singapore construction industry by helping construction clients identify multiple CSC apart from cost which should always be considered when assessing the capability of candidate contractors during the selection process, by assisting contractors in improving their attributes in line with clients’ preferences and by facilitating Singapore construction clients and researchers to develop a contractor selection system capable of assessing multiple attributes of the candidate contractors so that the risk of the project failure due to the selection of an inappropriate contractor is minimized.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers highly appreciate the construction practitioners who participated in interview and pilot test to enhance the intelligibility and representativeness of the questionnaire. Special thanks are also extended to the professionals from CPG Consultants, Singapore, who provided their valuable input to the writers throughout the process of this study, and to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (1999). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows, Routledge, London.
Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows—A guide for social scientists, Routledge, London.
Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2002). “BCA contractors registry.” Singapore, http://www.dir.bca.gov.sg/bca/index.asp (May 12, 2003).
The Business Roundtable. (1982). “Improving construction safety performance.” Rep. No. A-3. Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Rep. The Business roundtable, New York, 3–4.
Cheong, S.-W., and Tan, H. Y. (2003). “Out of side, out of money.” The Strait Times, Singapore, June 14.
Construction Industry Development Agency (CIDA). (1993). The Australian construction industry prequalifications criteria for contractors and subcontractors, Australia.
David, J. L., and Ronald, S. R. (1987). Marketing research, 7th Ed., Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Fong, P. S., and Choi, S. K. (2000). “Final contractor selection using analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 547–557.
Government of Singapore. (2002). “Singapore Government directory interactive (SGDi).” http://www.sgdi.gov.sg (May 10, 2003).
Guevara, V., and Tan, H. Y. (2003). “Contractors sink into red after undercutting each other.” The Strait Times, Singapore, June 11.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1997). “Criteria for contractor selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15, 19–38.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1998). “Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model.” Build. Environ., 33(2), 148–164.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Evaluating prequalification criteria in contractor selection.” Build. Environ., 29(4), 437–448.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “A review of contractor selection practices in the U.K. construction industry.” Build. Environ., 30(5), 533–561.
Jaselskis, E. J., and Suazo, G. A. (1994). “A survey of construction site safety in Honduras.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 12, 245–255.
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, 3rd Ed., ITP.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1996). “Contractor evaluation and selection: A Hong Kong perceptive.” Build. Environ., 31(3), 273–82.
Lim, L. (2004). “After two tragedies, a chance to reform industry.” The Straits Times, Singapore, May 20.
Liu, A. M. M., and Walker, A. (1998). “Evaluation of project outcomes.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16, 209–219.
Mahdi, I. M., Riley, M. J., Fereig, S. M., and Alex, A. P. (2002). “A multicriteria approach to contractor selection.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage. 9(1), 29–37.
Merna, A., and Smith, N. J. (1990). “Bid evaluation for the U.K. public sector construction contracts.” Proc., Inst. of Civ. Eng., 88, 91–105.
Ministry of Manpower. (2002). “Information on occupational safety and health.” Ministry of Manpower, Singapore, http://www.mom.gov.sg/MOM/CDA/0,1858,963---,00.html (May 12, 2005).
Moser, C. A., and Kalton, G. (1971). Survey methods in social investigation, 2nd Ed., Dartmouth University Press, Hanover, N.H.
Ng, T. S., Skitmore, R. M., and Smith, N. J. (1999). “Decision makers’ perception in the formulation of prequalification criteria.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 6(2), 155–65.
Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows: Base system users guide, release 6.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago.
Palaneeswaran, E., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2001). “Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies.” Build. Environ., 36(1), 73–87.
Pongpeng, J., and Liston, J. (2003a). “Contractor ability criteria: A view from the Thai construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21, 267–282.
Pongpeng, J., and Liston, J. (2003b). “TenSeM: A multicriteria and multidecision makers’ model in tender evaluation.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21, 21–30.
Real Estate Developer Association of Singapore (REDAS). (2002). “eDirectory.” http://www.redas.com (May 12, 2003).
Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Method and data analysis, 2nd Ed., McGraw–Hill, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Russell, J. S., Hancher, D. E., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1992). “Contractor prequalification data for construction owners.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 10, 117–29.
Samelson, N. M., Levitt, R. E., and Parker, H. W. (1981). “The role of owners in reducing construction accident costs.” 13th Project Management Institute Proc., Drexell Hill, Pa, 194–200.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Singapore Institute of Architects (SIA. (2002). “SIA member listing.” Singapore, http://www.sia.org.sg/efirms/member_firms.php (May 12, 2003).
Singapore Institute of Surveys and Valuers (SISV). (2002). “SISV member listing.” Singapore, http://www.sisv.org.sg/index.html (May 12, 2003).
Singh, D. (2005). “Fuzzy multiple criteria decision system for contractor selection.” Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore.
Singh, D., Goh, N. G., and Tiong, R. L. K (2003). “Local practice on procurement and tender evaluation system.” Proc., SMa Federation & IES Building & Construction Conf., Singapore Expo, Singapore.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2005). “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(1), 62–70.
Tan, H. Y. (2004a). “Going bust: Two more contractors.” The Strait Times, Singapore, June 12.
Tan, H. Y. (2004b). “Joint panel to review safety at worksites.” The Strait Times, Singapore, May 20.
Wee, L. (2004). “Has tender system become a scapegoat?” The Strait Times, Singapore, May 20.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Cooper, P. A. (2000). “Lowest price or value? Investigation of U.K. construction clients’ tender selection process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 767–774.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Harris, P. (2001). “Multicriteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of U.K. construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(4), 257–241.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132Issue 9September 2006
Pages: 998 - 1008

History

Received: Jul 20, 2004
Accepted: Feb 24, 2006
Published online: Sep 1, 2006
Published in print: Sep 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

D. Singh
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore 63978, Singapore (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Robert L. K. Tiong
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore 63978, Singapore. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share