TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2006

Infrastructure Development and Expansion under Uncertainty: A Risk-Preference-Based Lattice Approach

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 6

Abstract

Optimal infrastructure development and expansion decision making requires taking into account contingent expansion decisions and underlying uncertainty, such as demand, during the planning period. Recent publications on life cycle management have used lattice models and Markov decision models to evaluate infrastructure development and management policies. In this paper, a risk-preference based lattice model is presented, and it provides the optimal contingent decisions in terms of a risk preference that can be other than risk neutrality. The proposed methodology is demonstrated in an example involving constructing and expanding a parking garage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abaza, K. A. (2002). “Optimum flexible pavement life-cycle analysis model.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(16), 542–549.
Ben-Akiva, M., Humplick, F., Madanat, S., and Ramaswamy, R. (1993). “Infrastructure management under uncertainty: Latent performance approach.” J. Transp. Eng., 119(1), 43–58.
Cox, J. S., Ross, S., and Rubinstein, M. (1979). “Option pricing: A simplified approach.” J. Financ. Econ., 7, 229–264.
Estes, A. C., Frangopol, D. M., and Lin, K.-Y. (1997). “Minimum expected life-cycle cost design for bridges.” Proc., 7th IFIP WG7.5 Working Conf., Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, Pergamon, Terrytown, N.Y., 133–140.
Federal Highway Administration (2001). “Deficient bridges by state and highway system.” ⟨www.fhwa. dot. gov/bridge/defbr01.htm
Golabi, K., and Thompson, P. (1990). “A network optimization system for maintenance and improvement of California's bridges.” Bridge evaluation, repair and rehabilitation, A. S. Nowak, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 41–55.
Hearn, G., and Shim, H.-S. (1998). “Integration of bridge management systems and nondestructive evaluations.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 4(2), 49–55.
Herath, H. S. B., and Park, C. S. (1999). “Economic analysis of R&D Projects: An options approach.” Eng. Econ., 44(1), 1–35.
Huchzermeier, A., and Loch, C. H. (2001). “Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D.” Manage. Sci., 47(1), 85–101.
Jiang, M., Corotis, R. B., and Ellis, J. H. (2000). “Optimal life-cycle costing with partial observability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(2), 56–66.
Luenberger, D. G. (1998). Investment science, Oxford, New York.
Madanat, S. (1993a). “Incorporating inspection decisions in pavement management.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 27(6), 425–438.
Madanat, S. (1993b). “Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty.” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 1(1), 77–88.
Matasov, A. I. (1998). Estimators for uncertain dynamic systems, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Park, C. S., and Herath, H. S. B. (1999). “Exploiting uncertainty-investment opportunities as real options: A new way of thinking in engineering economics.” Eng. Econ., 45(1), 1–36.
Rendleman, R. J., and Barter, B. J. (1979). “Two state option pricing.” J. Financ., 34, 1092–1110.
Scherer, W. T., and Glagola, D. M. (1994). “Markovian models for bridge maintenance management.” J. Transp. Eng., 120(1), 37–51.
Sharpe, W. F. (1978). Investment, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Smilowitz, K., and Madanat, S. (2000). “Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15, 5–13.
Tao, Z., Corotis, R. B., and Ellis, J. H. (1995). “Reliability-based structural design with Markov decision processes.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(6), 971–980.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and Srensen, J. D. (1987). “Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 4(2), 94–100.
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Trigeorgis, L., and Mason, S. P. (1987). “Valuing managerial flexibility.” Midland Corporate Financial J., 5(1), 14–21.
Tseng, C.-L., and Lin, K. Y. (2004). “A framework using two-factor price lattices for generation asset valuation.” Oper. Res. (in press).
Wirsching, P. H., and Ortiz, K. (1990). “Optimal economic strategies with considerations of reliability of fatigue-sensitive structural systems.” Struct. Safety, 7, 199–206.
Zayed, T. M., Chang, L.-M., and Fricker, J. D. (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis using deterministic and stochastic methods: Conflicting results.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 16(2), 63–74.
Zhao, T., Sundararajan, S. K., and Tseng, C.-L. (2004). “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(1), 23–32.
Zhao, T., and Tseng, C.-L. (2003). “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(3), 89–97.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132Issue 6June 2006
Pages: 620 - 625

History

Received: Dec 14, 2004
Accepted: Oct 5, 2005
Published online: Jun 1, 2006
Published in print: Jun 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tong Zhao, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Consultant, Delta Consulting Group, Inc., 310 Commerce St., Occoquan, VA 22125. E-mail: [email protected]; and Affiliate Researcher, Bridge Engineering Software and Technology Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Chung C. Fu, F.ASCE [email protected]
Director/Affiliate Associate Professor, Bridge Engineering Software and Technology Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share