Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Their Performance within School Districts
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 11
Abstract
Multiple prime is one type of construction delivery system and it is the subject of many discussions in the industry. Many general contractors, architects, and owners believe that this system inherently has coordination problems. On the other hand, specialty contractors believe that this system has several advantages because of the exclusion of the intermediate parties and the direct relationship of these contractors to the owner. The goal of this study is to objectively analyze the performance of construction delivery systems within public school districts. The school districts in the states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Virginia form the population of this study. Quantitative and qualitative variables are used for comparison. ANOVA and two-sample tests are used as statistical tools for the quantitative, and the chi-square test is used for the qualitative analysis. Two groups of projects are examined. Set one includes all valid responses to a survey sent to school district superintendents. The second set is limited to the analysis of projects whose total cost is greater than . Descriptive statistics on the incidence of litigation in these projects is also presented in the results. The conclusions from this study can guide owners, especially public entities with limited flexibility, in the selection of the delivery system appropriate for their project. It can guide contractors in identifying opportunities for improving services to their clients. This study has provided quantitative and qualitative measures of alternative project delivery systems in public projects that could lead to further research as well as the development of delivery systems that would satisfy the multiple stakeholders in construction projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Becker, B. (1993). “Single vs. separate bidding.” Electrical Contracting Foundation, Bethesda, Md.
Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y. H., Ng, T., and Odabasi, A. M. (2003). “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 382–387.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 435–444.
Konchar, M. D. (1997). “A comparison of United States project delivery systems.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, Pa.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 54–62.
Moore, D. S., and McCabe, G. P. (2003). Introduction to the practice of statistics, 4th Ed., Freeman, New York.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). “Documentation for the NCES Common Core of Data, National Public Education Financial Survey (NPEFS), School Year 2002–03, Fiscal Year 2003.” NCES 2005-358, U.S. Dept. of Education.
Office of the Auditor General State of Illinois. (2002). “State’s construction contracting methods.” Springfield, Ill., ⟨http:www.state.il.us/auditor/cdb.pdf⟩ (July 2004).
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (1999). “Impact of the Wicks law on public construction in New York City.” New York.
RS Means. (2001). Building construction cost data, 60th Annual Ed., Kingston, Mass.
RS Means. (2002). Building construction cost data, 61st Annual Ed., Kingston, Mass.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 30, 2004
Accepted: Mar 24, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.