TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2005

Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 9

Abstract

Designing for construction safety entails consideration of the safety of construction workers in the design of a project. Research studies have identified the design aspect of projects as being a significant contributing factor to construction site accidents. Designing to eliminate or avoid hazards prior to exposure on the jobsite is also listed as the top priority in the hierarchy of controls common to the safety and health professions. Widespread implementation of the concept in the United States by engineering and architecture firms, however, is lacking due to perceived industry and project barriers. Given its absence from standard design practice, a question arises as to the viability of designing for safety as an intervention in the construction industry. This paper presents a pilot study that was conducted to investigate the practice of addressing construction worker safety when designing a project and to determine the feasibility and practicality of such an intervention. Through interviews of architects and engineers, the study found that a large percentage of design professionals are interested and willing to implement the concept in practice. Among the perceived impacts of implementation, project cost and schedule were mentioned most often along with limitations being placed on design creativity. The results of the pilot study indicate that designing for safety is a viable intervention in construction. The factors that impact the consideration of safety in the design of a project do not entirely prohibit its implementation or make its implementation extremely impractical and therefore not feasible. Additionally, the outcomes of implementation provide sufficient motivation to implement the concept in practice. The paper describes the key changes needed for implementation of the concept in practice which include: a change in designer mindset toward safety; establishment of a motivational force to promote designing for safety; increase designer knowledge of the concept; incorporate construction safety knowledge in the design phase; utilize designers knowledgeable about design-for-safety modifications; make design for safety tools and guidelines available for use and reference; and mitigate designer liability exposure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The study described in this paper was funded by the Center to Protect Workers’ Rights (CPWR). The writers appreciate the support of CPWR and the input provided by the design professionals and others who participated in the study.

References

Angelo, W. F. (2004). “Design-builder builds safety into total jobsite approach.” Engineering News-Record, June 28.
Behm, M. (2004). “Establishing the link between construction fatalities and disabling injuries and the design for construction safety concept.” PhD dissertation, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore.
Bluff, L. (2003). “Regulating safe design and planning of construction works: A review of strategies for regulating OHS in the design and planning of buildings, structures, and other construction projects.” Working Paper 19, The Australian National Univ., Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Council of the European Communities (CEC). (1992). “Council directive 92/57/EEC of 24 June 1992 on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites.” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1991). From drawing board to building site, HMSO Books, London.
Gambatese, J. A. (1998). “Liability in designing for construction worker safety.” J. Archit. Eng., 4(3), 107–112.
Gambatese, J. A. (2000). “Designing for safety.” Construction safety and health management, R. J. Coble, J. W. Hinze, and T. C. Haupt, eds., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 169–192.
Gambatese, J. A. (2003). “Safety emphasis in university engineering and construction programs.” Construction safety education and training—A global perspective, International e-Journal of Construction, M. E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Gambatese, J. A., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. W. (2003). “Engineering mandates stipulated in OSHA regulations.” Proc., 2003 Construction Research Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.
Gambatese, J. A., Hinze, J. W., and Haas, C. T. (1997). “Tool to design for construction worker safety.” J. Archit. Eng., 3(1), 32–41.
Gibb, A., Haslam, R., Hide, S., and Gyi, D. (2004). “The role of design in accident causality.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., and Weinstein, M. (2004a). “Designing for safety and health in construction: An introduction.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., and Weinstein, M. (2004b). “Life cycle safety: An intervention to improve construction worker safety and health through design.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Hecker, S., Gibbons, B., and Barsotti, A. (2001). “Making ergonomic changes in construction: Worksite training and task interventions.” Applied ergonomics, D. Alexander and R. Rabourn, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 162–189.
Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO). (1994). “Construction (design and management) regulations.” Statutory Instrument No. 3410, London.
Hinze, J., and Wiegand, F. (1992). “Role of designers in construction worker safety.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(4), 677–684.
Institute for Safety Through Design (ISTD). (2003). National Safety Council, Itasca, Ill. ⟨http://www.nsc.org/istd/aboutus.htm⟩ (Oct. 13, 2003).
Istephan, T. (2004). “Collaboration, total design, and integration of safety and health in design: Project case studies.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Korman, R. (2001). “Wanted: New idea: Panel ponders ways to end accidents and health hazards.” Engineering News-Record, Dec. 31.
MacKenzie, J., Gibb, A. G., and Bouchlaghem, N. M. (2000). “Communication: The key to designing safely.” Proc., Designing for Safety and Health Conf., C.I.B. Working Commission W99 and the European Construction Institute (ECI), London, TF005/4, 77–84.
Manuele, F. A. (1997). On the practice of safety, Wiley, New York.
NSW Construction Policy Steering Committee (2000). “Occupational health, safety, and rehabilitation management systems.” DPWS 98051, Sidney, New South Wales, Australia.
Republic of South Africa (1993). “Occupational safety and health act, No. 85 of 1993.” Government Gazette, No. 14918.
Republic of South Africa (2003). “Construction regulations.” Government Gazette, No. 25207.
Smallwood, J. J. (1996). “The influence of designers on occupational safety and health.” Proc., 1st International Conf. of CIB Working Commission W99, Implementation of Safety and Health on Construction Sites, Lisbon, Portugal, 203–213.
Smallwood, J. J. (2004). “The influence of engineering designers on health and safety during construction.” J. South African Institution Civil Engineering, SAICE, 46(1), 2–8.
Suraji, A., Duff, A. R., and Peckitt, S. J. (2001). “Development of causal model of construction accident causation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(4), 337–345.
Toole, T. M. (2004). “Rethinking designers’ roles in construction safety.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Weinstein, M., Gambatese, J., and Hecker, S. (2004). “Outcomes of a design-for-safety process: A case study of a large capital project.” Designing for safety and health in construction: Proc., Research and Practice Symp., S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., UO Press, Eugene, Ore.
Whittington, D., Livingstone, A., and Lucas, D. A. (1992). “Research into management, organizational and human factors in the construction industry.” HSE Contract Research Rep. No. 45/1992. HMSO Books, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 9September 2005
Pages: 1029 - 1036

History

Received: Oct 6, 2004
Accepted: Feb 28, 2005
Published online: Sep 1, 2005
Published in print: Sep 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John A. Gambatese, M.ASCE
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331-2303 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Michael Behm
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Industrial Technology, East Carolina Univ., Greenville, NC 27858. E-mail: [email protected]
Jimmie W. Hinze, M.ASCE
P.E.
Professor, M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-5703. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share