Analytic Network Process Applied to Project Selection
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 4
Abstract
Owing to the complexity of a construction project, the analytic network process (ANP) is helpful to deal with interdependent relationships within a multicriteria decision-making model. This paper demonstrates an example to illustrate how to empirically prioritize a set of projects by using a five-level project selection model. A questionnaire was filled by a group of construction professionals of a medium-sized local developer and scores were computed for prioritizing the potential projects. The paper is relevant to both industry practitioners and researchers. Industry practitioners may adopt the weighted criteria for direct project selection or apply the ANP method to prioritize their own set of selection criteria. Researchers may rely on this paper as a point of departure for exploring other uses of ANP.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This paper was partly supported by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University under Grant No. G-YW72. The writers would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of the paper.
References
Alidi, A. S. (1996). “Use of the analytic hierarchy process to measure the initial viability of industrial projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 14(4), 205–208.
Badri, M. A., Davis, D., and Davis, D. (2001). “A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 243–252.
Behrens, W., and Hawranek, P. M. (1991). Manual for the preparation of industrial feasibility studies, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2001). “Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP).” Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur., 9(2), 61–70.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2004). “Contractor selection using the analytic network process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., in press.
Cheng, E. W. L., Li, H., and Ho, D. C. K. (2002). “Analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A defective tool when used improperly.” Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), 33–37.
Cheung, S., Lam, T., Wan, Y., and Lam, K. (2001). “Improving objectivity in procurement selection.” J. Manage. Eng., 17(3), 132–139.
Chin, K., Chiu, S., and Tummala, V. M. R. (1999). “An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001-based EMS.” Int. J. Quality Reliability Manage., 16(4), 341–361.
Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., and Roodhooft, F. (2000). “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 125, 34–58.
Expert Choice for Windows, User Manual. (1996). Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh.
Gori, E. (1996). “Portfolio selection of capital investment projects in the Durban Metropolitan Region.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 14, 451–456.
Lee, J. W., and Kim, S. H. (2001). “An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 111–118.
Lingard, H. (2002). “The effect of first aid training on Australian construction workers’ occupational health and safety knowledge and motivation to avoid work-related injury or illness.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20, 263–273.
Meade, L., and Sarkis, J. (1998). “Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytic network process.” Transp. Res. Part E, 34(3), 201–215.
Meade, L. M., and Presley, A. (2002). “R&D project selection using the analytic network process.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 49(1), 59–66.
Mohamed, S., and McCowan, A. K. (2001). “Modeling project investment decisions under uncertainty using possibility theory.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 231–241.
Mohanty, R. P. (1992). “Project selection by a multiple-criteria decision-making method: An example from a developing country.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 10(1), 31–38.
Molenaar, K. R., and Songer, A. D. (1998). “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 467–479.
Moselhi, O., and Deb, B. (1993). “Project selection considering risk.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 11, 45–52.
Oberlender, G. D., and Trost, S. M. (2001). “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates based on estimate quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(3), 173–182.
Odusote, O. O., and Fellows, R. F. (1992). “An examination of the importance of resource considerations when contractors make project selection decisions.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 10, 137–151.
Okpala, D. C. (1991). “Evaluation and selection of construction projects in Nigeria.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 9, 51–61.
Pillai, A. S., Joshi, A., and Rao, K. S. (2002). “Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20, 165–177.
Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environments, Creative Decisions Foundation, Pittsburgh.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw–Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Sarkis, J. (1999). “A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 36, 793–810.
Wong, E. T. T., Norman, G., and Flanagan, R. (2000). “A fuzzy stochastic technique for project selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 407–414.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 26, 2003
Accepted: Jul 29, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.