TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2005

Embodying Product and Process Flexibility to Cope with Challenging Project Deliveries

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 4

Abstract

Four factors make it challenging to manage semiconductor fabrication facility (“fabs”) projects: technical complexity of the product design, need to compress the project duration, need to reduce upfront costs, and unexpected project changes. The strategies employed by practitioners to cope with these challenges form an intricate puzzle. We empirically develop a framework that provides a structure for helping to solve this puzzle, which comprises two principles: investing upfront in a flexible product design and structuring a flexible process. Empirical findings reveal that project teams make commitments early on by overdesigning but also postpone critical decisions by differentiating the scope of their work. Project teams employ other strategies such as increasing communication, using modular architectures, engaging in four-dimensional computer-based modeling, and fabricating components and subsystems off-site. Our analysis yields understanding on the purposes and performance tradeoffs of these strategies, and on how they embody the two principles. Project managers may find the framework useful when deciding which strategies best suit other equally challenging projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments are due to the Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento and to the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal) for the financial support provided to the first author for doctoral and post-doctoral studies. In the early stages, this research was funded through Grant No. SBR-9811052 from the National Science Foundation, whose support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Finally, we thank all people interviewed, at IDC in particular, for the time and knowledge they shared with us.

References

Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B., and Wasket, P. (1999). “Analytical design planning technique: A model for the detailed building process.” Des. Stud., 20(3), 279–296.
Ball, L. J., Lambell, N. J., Ormerod, T. C., Slavin, S., and Mariani, J. A. (2001). “Representing design rationale to support innovative design reuse: A minimalist approach.” Autom. Constr., 10(6), 647–770.
Ballard, G., Tommelein, I., Koskela, L., and Howell, G. (2002). “Lean construction tools and techniques.” R. Best and G. de Valence, eds., Chap. 15, Design and construction: Building in value, Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science, New York, 227–255.
Bresnen, M., and Fowler, C. (1994). “The organizational correlates and consequences of subcontracting: Evidence from a survey of South Wales business.” J. Manage. Stud. (Oxford), 31(6), 847–865.
Burnett, J. (1997). Design of world-class microelectronic facilities for sub-micron chip manufacturing, Burnett Technology, Aptos, Calif.
Chasey, A. D., and Merchant, S. (2000). “Issues for construction of 300mm Fab.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(6), 451–457.
Crichton, C. (1966). Interdependence and uncertainty. A study of the building industry, Tavistock, U.K.
Cusumano, M. A (1994). “The limits of ‘lean.’.” Sloan Management Review, Summer, 27–32.
“Face value foundry father.” (2001). The Economist, May 19, 62.
Ford, D. (2002). “Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1), 30–39.
Garrett, T., and Garside, M. (2003). “Fab pilot of a multi-dimensional CAD system.” Future Fab International, 14.
Gibb, A. G. (1999). Off-site fabrication—Pre-assembly, prefabrication and modularisation, Wiley, New York.
Gil, N. (2001). “Product-process development simulation to support specialty contractor involvement in early design.” PhD dissertation, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
Gil, N., Tommelein, I. D., Miles, R. S., Ballard, G., and Kirkendall, R. L. (2001). “Leveraging specialty contractor knowledge in design.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(5∕6), 355–367.
Hanna, A. S., Camlic, R., Peterson, P. A., and Nordheim, E. V. (2002). “Quantitative definition of projects impacted by change orders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1), 57–64.
Harris, N., and Zachary, G. P. (2000). “Motorola to invest $2billion in Scotland plant.” Wall Street Journal, April 21.
Hegazy, T., Zaneldin, E., and Grierson, D. (2001). “Improving design coordination for building projects. I: Information model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(4), 322–329.
Iansiti, M. (1995). “Shooting the rapids: Managing product development in turbulent environments.” California Manage. Rev., 38(1), 37–58.
Ibbs, C. W. (1997). “Quantitative impacts of project change: Size issues.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(3), 308–311.
Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y. H., Ng, T., and Odabasi, A. M. (2003). “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 382–387.
Jacome, M., Peixoto, H., Royo, A., and Lopez, J. (1999). “The design space layer: Supporting early design space exploration for core-based designs.” Proc., Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE ’99), Germany, 676–685.
Kazmer, D., and Roser, C. (1999). “Evaluation of product and process design robustness.” Res. Eng. Des., 11, 22–30.
Koo, B., and Fischer, M. (2000). “Feasibility study of 4D CAD in commercial construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 251–260.
Korman, T. M., Fischer, M. A., and Tatum, C. B. (2003). “Knowledge and reasoning for MEP coordination.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(6), 627–634.
Koskela, L., Howell, G., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. (2002). “The foundations of lean construction.” Design and construction: Building in value, R. Best and G. de Valence, eds., Chap. 14, Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science, New York, 211–226.
Krishnan, V. (1996). “Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 43(2), 210–217.
Larson, E. (1997). “Partnering on construction projects: A study of the relationships between partnering activities and project success.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 44(2), 188–195.
McDonald, C. J. (1998). “The evolution of Intel’s copy EXACTLY! technology transfer method.” Intel Technol. J., Q4.
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook, 2nd Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Morse, J. M. (1994). “Designing funded qualitative research.” Handbook of qualitative research, N. S. Denzin and Y. S. Lincon, eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 220–235.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., and Berry, D. (1999). “Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 62, 107–118.
Patrashkova-Volzdoska, R. R., McComb, S. A., Green, S. G., and Compton, W. D. (2003). “Examining a curvilinear relationship between communication frequency and team performance in cross-functional project teams.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 50(3), 262–269.
Pavitt, T. C., and Gibb, A. G. F. (2003). “Interface management within construction: In particular, building façade.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(1), 8–15.
Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning for fast-tracking building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(6), 445–456.
Pietroforte, R. (1997). “Communication and governance in the building process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15, 71–82.
Semiconductor Industry Association (2000). “National technology roadmap for semiconductors: 2000 update. Factory integration, TX.” SEMANTECHhttp:∕∕public.itrs.net∕Files∕2000UpdateFinal∕2kUdFinal.htm⟩ (July 8, 2001).
Slaughter, S. E. (2001). “Design strategies to increase building flexibility.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(3), 208–217.
Taguchi, G., and Clausing, D. (1990). “Robust quality.” Harvard Business Review, January–February, 301–311.
Thomke, S., and Reinertsen, D. (1998). “Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments.” California Manage. Rev., 1(1), Fall, 8–30
Tommelein, I. D. (1998). “Pull-driven scheduling for pipe-spool installation: Simulation of lean construction technique.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(4), 279–288.
Touran, A. (2003). “Calculation of contingency in construction projects.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 50(2), 135–140.
Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Van Maanen, M. (1977). “Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical.” Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.
Wood, S. C. (1997). “The impact of tool delivery times on the optimal capacity and value of semiconductor wafer fabs.” Proc., IEMT Symp, Austin, Tex.
Wright, P. K. (2001). 21st century manufacturing, 1st Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 4April 2005
Pages: 439 - 448

History

Received: Jan 8, 2004
Accepted: Mar 30, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, Division of Operations, Technology, and Innovation Management, Manchester Business School, The Univ. of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Iris D. Tommelein [email protected]
Professor, Civil & Environmental Engineering Dept., Engineering & Project Management Program, 215 McLaughlin Hall, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712. E-mail: [email protected]
Director, Capital Development Group, Intel Corporate Services, Chandler, AZ. E-mail: [email protected]
Thomas Garrett [email protected]
Director, New Factory Startups, Intel Logic Technology Development, Hillsboro, Portland, OR. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share