Using Benchmarks and Metrics to Evaluate Project Delivery of Environmental Restoration Programs
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 129, Issue 2
Abstract
The United States is in the middle of a large environmental restoration effort that is hampered by a lack of knowledge on how to measure the performance of the project delivery process. This study evaluates one environmental restoration program’s ability to deliver projects: the Environmental Management Program (EMP), a federally sponsored program managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Project performance metrics are compiled and used to measure two types of program improvements made in project delivery: trend improvements over time, and the ability to reach established benchmarks. The benchmarks come from both agency guidance and construction industry benchmarks. The metrics measure the program’s ability to accurately estimate the required resources (time and money) to accomplish the project, estimate the cost to operate and maintain the project, and meet the customers’ design requirements. To build the metrics, estimates from the project planning documents are compared against the actual results. Currently, the Corps of Engineers has established some benchmarks and does evaluate projects for design success, but the benchmarks do not include all aspects of project delivery and are not universally applied. Analysis of the metrics shows that the Corps has made improvements in the delivery of projects, but some major components of the process should be improved. Establishing benchmarks would provide the Corps with information to improve the project delivery of the EMP and other environmental restoration programs across the country. This study provides an example of applying business principles to a governmental program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Belle, R. A.(2000). “Benchmarking and enhancing best practices in the engineering and construction sector.” J. Manage. Eng., 16(1), 40–47.
Bengert, C. E., Jr., and Rooney, C. S. (2000). “Benchmarking to achieve ‘best in class’ status.” Paint and Coating Industry, 14.9, 94–95.
Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee.
Clarke, J., Nienaber, and McCool, D. C. (1996). Staking out the terrain, State Univ. of New York Press, New York.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1999). Benchmarking and Metrics Data Rep. for 1998, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Texas, April.
Emhjellen, K. (1998). “Improving project management through benchmarking.” Proc., 29th Annual Project Management Institute Seminars and Symposium, PMI Publishing.
Kaplin, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard, Harvard School Press, Mass.
McConachy, B. R. (1996). “Concurrent management of total cost and total quality.” Transactions of AACE Int., QMA21–QMA26.
Plemmons, J. K., and Bell, L. C. (1994). “Measuring and benchmarking materials effectiveness.” American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions, MAT2.1–MAT2.9.
Shreffler, D. K., et al. (1995). National review of non-Corps environmental restoration projects, Pacific Northwest Laboratory.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1986). Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program General Plan, North Central Division of the Corps of Engineers, Chicago.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1988). 3rd Annual Addendum, Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, North Central Division of the Corps of Engineers, Chicago.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1989). 4th Annual Addendum, Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, North Central Division of the Corps of Engineers, Chicago.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1990). 5th Annual Addendum, Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, North Central Division of the Corps of Engineers, Chicago.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1991). 6th Annual Addendum, Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, North Central Division of the Corps of Engineers, Chicago.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1996). Proc., Workshop for Engineering and Design of Environmental Management Program Projects, 29–30.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1997). Rep. to Congress: An Evaluation of the Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, Rock Island Engineer District, Rock Island, Ill.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1998). Regulation No. ER 5-1-11, Program and Project Management, Dept. of the Army.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1999). Proc., Engineering, Design, and Construction Workshop of Environmental Management Program Projects, 16–17.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2000). “Reference Cost to Operate and Maintain EMP Projects.” Letter to the Mississippi Division of the Corps of Engineers (January 27).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 129 • Issue 2 • April 2003
Pages: 119 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 3, 2001
Accepted: Dec 5, 2001
Published online: Mar 14, 2003
Published in print: Apr 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.