Partnering on Defense Contracts
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 128, Issue 2
Abstract
Contracting on government construction projects has historically been structured and adversarial. The decade of the 1990s saw the advent of a new attitude in government contracting that emulated success stories from the private sector. After witnessing several high-profile success stories such as constructing the Atlanta Olympic Park, the government embraced the concept of partnering as a primary method of contract administration. The private sector consistently demonstrated an ability to contract for services while realizing a marked decrease in claims and litigation costs with partnering. Their success was founded in the building of trust within the project team by creating a common bond between previously dissociated parties. This was achieved through developing a mutual understanding of the other parties’ interests and goals in the project while maintaining a team focus on the ultimate goal of a successful project. The government espied partnering as a way to improve its relationships with contractors and reduce the volume of litigation that seemed to only be increasing in the industry. The government began a paradigm shift by instilling a new attitude of openness and communication with contractors as well as implementing several broad contract administration changes. This paper examines the process of partnering, its key elements and core competencies, and how various agencies apply these principles in their construction management. The paper further researches stakeholder goals and important issues when entering into a partnering relationship on government contracts and what barriers are perceived that preclude the process from working as effectively as possible.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Associated General Contractors of America (AGC). (1991). Partnering—a concept for success, Alaxandria, Va.
Buffington, J. E. (1992). “Partnering.” Mimeographed Rep., Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria, Va.
Consensus Building Institute. (1996). “Partnering, consensus building, and alternative disputes resolution: current uses and opportunities in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.” IWR Working Paper 96-ADR-WP-8, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1995). Guideline for implementation of CII concepts: best practices for the construction industry, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1996). Model for partnering excellence, Austin, Tex.
Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division. (1996). Partnering implementation guide, Sterling, Va.
Edelman, L., Carr, F., and Lancaster, C. L. (1991). “Partnering.” IWR Pamphlet 91-ADR-P-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
Gunn, T. E. (1991). “Partnering.” Mimeographed Rep., Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria, Va.
Herbert Chock and Associates. (1996). “Partnering…” Partnering: American team building at Herbert Chock and Associates, Inc., Honolulu.
Larson, E., and Drexler, J. A. (1997). “Barriers to project partnering: report from the firing line.” Project Management Journal, March.
Podziba, S. L. (1995). “Deciding whether or not to partner small projects: a guide for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers managers.” IWR Pamphlet 95-ADR-P-6, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of the Interior. (1991). Partnering: a new concept for attaining construction goals, Washington, D.C.
U.S. General Services Administration (U.S. GSA). (1996). “Partnering in federal design and construction.” 〈www.gsa.gov/pbs/pc/gd_files/partner.htm〉.
Welch, J. (1996). “Partnering: construction project management.” On-line management, Four Corners Management Systems, Durango, Colo.
“Your choice makes the difference.” Engineering News Record, February.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 20, 2000
Accepted: Oct 13, 2000
Published online: Apr 1, 2002
Published in print: Apr 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.