Improvement Algorithm for Limited Space Scheduling
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127, Issue 2
Abstract
Selecting construction methods, scheduling activities, and planning the use of site space are key to constructing a project efficiently. Site layout and activity scheduling have been tackled as independent problems. Their interdependence is often ignored at the planning stage and may be dealt with—if at all—when construction is underway. Problems that may have had easy solutions if dealt with earlier, may then be expensive to remedy. This paper addresses the combined problem termed “space scheduling” and presents an algorithmic time-space trade-off model for adjusting activity durations and start dates to decrease the need for space over congested time periods. The model characterizes resource space requirements over time and establishes a time-space relationship for each activity in the schedule, based on alternative resource levels. An example illustrates the presented algorithm that generates a feasible space schedule.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Akinci, B., Fischer, M., and Zabelle, T. ( 1998). “Proactive approach for reducing non-value adding activities due to time-space conflicts.” Proc., 6th Annu. Conf. Int. Group for Lean Constr., IGLC-6, Guaruja, Brazil.
2.
Mawdesley, M. J., Cullingford, G., and Haddadi, A. ( 1988). “Site layout and resource scheduling—An approach to modelling movement around sites.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Robotics in Constr., ISARC, Tokyo.
3.
Morad, A. A., and Beliveau, Y. J. (1991). “Knowledge-based planning system.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(1), 1), 1–12.
4.
Rad, P. ( 1980). “Analysis of working space congestion from scheduling data.” Am. Assn. Cost Engrs. Trans., F4.1–F4.5.
5.
Riley, D. R. ( 1994). “Modeling the space behavior of construction activities.” PhD thesis, Arch. Engrg. Dept., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
6.
Smith, D. M. ( 1987). “An investigation of the space constraint problem in construction planning.” MS thesis, Civ. Engrg. Dept., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
7.
Thabet, W. Y., and Beliveau, Y. J. (1994). “Modeling work space to schedule repetitive floors in multistory buildings.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(1), 96–116.
8.
Thabet, W. Y., and Beliveau, Y. J. (1997). “SCaRC: Space-constrained resource-constrained scheduling system.”J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 11(1), 48–59.
9.
Tommelein, I. D., Castillo, J. G., and Zouein, P. P. ( 1992). “Space-time characterization for resource management on construction sites.” Proc., 8th Conf. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, New York, 623–630.
10.
Tommelein, I. D., and Zouein, P. P. (1993). “Interactive dynamic layout planning.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(2), 266–287.
11.
Tommelein, I. D., Dzeng, R. J., and Zouein, P. P. ( 1993). “Exchanging layout and schedule data in a real-time distributed environment.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. Comp. in Civ. and Build. Engrg., ASCE, New York, 947–954.
12.
Zouein, P. P., and Tommelein, I. D. ( 1994b). “Time-space tradeoff strategies for space-schedule construction.” Proc., 1st Congr. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, New York, 2, 1180–1187.
13.
Zouein, P. P. ( 1995). “Move schedule: A planning tool for scheduling space use on construction sites.” PhD thesis, Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
14.
Zouein, P. P., and Tommelein, I. D. (1999). “Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 125(6), 400–408.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Dec 20, 1999
Published online: Apr 1, 2001
Published in print: Apr 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.