Overexertion Injuries in Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 125, Issue 2
Abstract
Overexertion injuries are the single largest classification of injury in construction, accounting for about 24% of all injuries. Overexertion injuries generally occur as a result of performing a given task as planned. While overexertion injuries are not intentional, the underlying causes of these injuries are built into the prescribed tools and work methods. If the causes can be identified, it should be possible to engineer them out of the work. This paper presents a summary of research to investigate 65 construction activities for the presence of risk factors for overexertion injuries. Each activity has been broken into its constituent tasks, and each task has been analyzed for each of seven generic risk factors for overexertion injuries: (1) repetitive exertions; (2) static exertions; (3) forceful exertions; (4) localized mechanical stresses; (5) posture stresses; (6) low temperature; and (7) vibration. Ratings for each risk factor have been made on a three point scale: insignificant, moderate, and high. This analysis shows that virtually all construction activities have moderate-to-high ratings for at least one risk factor, and thereby place craft workers at increased risk for overexertion injuries and disorders.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abraham, K. G., Weber, W. L., and Personick, M. E. ( 1996). “Improvements in the BLS safety and health statistical system.” Monthly Labor Rev., 119(4), 3–12.
2.
Accident facts . (1998). 1998 ed. National Safety Council, Itasca, Ill.
3.
Armstrong, T. A. ( 1993). Analysis and design of jobs for control of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
4.
Astrand, P. O., and Rodahl, K. ( 1986). Textbook of work physiology . McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Construction accidents: The workers' compensation data base 1985–1988 . (1992). Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.
6.
Cook, T. M., Rosecrance, J. C., and Zimmerman, C. L. ( 1996). The University of Iowa Construction Survey, Report E1-96 . Center to Protect Workers' Rights, Washington, D.C.
7.
“Encouraging young women to enter the trades: A word for counselors.” (1993). Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 37(1), 10–11.
8.
Everett, J. G. ( 1991). “Construction automation: Basic task selection, and development of the CRANIUM,” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
9.
Everett, J. G. ( 1996). “Ergonomic analysis of construction tasks for risk factors for overexertion injuries.” Final Rep., NIOSH Grant #5 R03 OH03154-02, Tech. Rep. UMCEE 96-27, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
10.
Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives . (1991). Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
11.
Helander, M., ed. ( 1981). Human factors/ergonomics for building and construction . Wiley, New York.
12.
Holmström, E., Moritz, U., and Engholm, G. ( 1995). Musculoskeletal disorders in construction workers. Occupational medicine: State of the art reviews, K. Ringen, A. Englund, L. Welch, J. L. Weeks, and J. L. Seegal, eds., 10(2), 295–312.
13.
Johnston, W. B., and Packer, A. H. ( 1987). Workforce 2000, work and workers for the 21st century . Hudson Institute, Indianapolis, Ind.
14.
Keyserling, W. M., Brouwer, M., and Silverstein, B. A. ( 1992). “A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors resulting from awkward postures of the legs, trunk and neck.” Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 9(1), 283–301.
15.
Keyserling, W. M., and Wittig, S. ( 1988). “An analysis of experts' rating of ergonomic stressors.” Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 2, 291–304.
16.
Krizan, W. G., Bradford, H., and Setzer, S. W. ( 1993). “Tools of the trade get new healthy look, feel.” ENR, 230(8), 32–34.
17.
Occupational injuries and illness: Counts, rates, and characteristics, 1992 . (1995). Bulletin 2455, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.
18.
Oglesby, C. H., Parker, H. W., and Howell, G. A. ( 1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
19.
Projections 2000 . (1988). Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.
20.
“Repeat-motion injuries grow.” (1989). ENR, 222(1), 14–15.
21.
“Report takes aim at naysayers.” (1998). ENR, 241(14), 12.
22.
Schneider, S., and Susi, P. ( 1994). “Ergonomics and construction: A review of potential hazards in new construction.” American Industrial Hygiene Assoc. J., 55(7), 635–649.
23.
Schneider, S., Punnett, L., and Cook, T. M. ( 1995). “Ergonomics: Applying what we know.” Construction Safety and Health, Occupational medicine, state of the art reviews, K. Ringen, A. Englund, L. Welch, J. L. Weeks, and J. L. Seegal, eds., 10(2), 385–394.
24.
“The future of the industry is well `grounded' because of the support of these electrical contractors.” (1996). ENR, 236(4), 6.
25.
“Women 3% of Construction Trades.” (1993). ENR, 230(1), 7.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 125 • Issue 2 • March 1999
Pages: 109 - 114
History
Received: Jan 27, 1997
Published online: Mar 1, 1999
Published in print: Mar 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.