Optimization of Crew Configurations Using Activity-Based Costing
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124, Issue 2
Abstract
The goal of this research was to develop and illustrate a technique for finding the optimum crew configuration, from a range of possible configurations, assigned to complete a defined quantity of work in a timely and cost-effective manner. The concept of activity-based costing was used to define the scope of the work in terms of the activities to be accomplished and their associated productivity rates and cost of performance. These data are modeled as distributions of random variables. Past experience, as well as local job conditions, can be used to determine the values associated with these distributions. The temporal and logical relationships between the activities are established through a process flowchart. An activity based, stochastic simulation program (ABC-SIM), was used to measure the elapsed time and activity cost for each of the candidate crew configurations. Excess cost is the activity cost minus the shift cost, which is based on the number of full shifts required to accomplish the work multiplied by the cost per shift. Excess cost is a measure of inefficiency caused by crews waiting in queue. Finally, an optimum crew configuration can be selected using an optimization rule that best satisfies project objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AbouRizk, S., and Halpin, D. (1992). “Statistical properties of construction duration data.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(3).
2.
Back, W. E., and Bell, L. C. (1995). “Monte Carlo simulation as tool for process reengineering.”J. Mgmt. Engrg., 11(5).
3.
Canada, J., Sullivan, W., and White, J. (1996). Capital investment analysis for engineering and management. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Clifs, N.J.
4.
Compton, T. (1994). “Using activity-based costing in your organization —parts 1 and 2.”J. Sys. Mgmt., April.
5.
Halpin, D., and Riggs, L. (1992). Planning and analysis of construction operations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Liggett, H. R., Trevino, J., and Lavelle, J. P. (1992). “Activity based cost management systems in an advanced manufacturing environment. Economic and financial justification of advanced manufacturing technologies, H. R. Parsaei, ed., Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
7.
McCahill D., and Bernold, L. (1993). “Resource oriented modeling and simulation in construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., 119(3).
8.
O'Guin, M. (1991). The complete guide to activity based costing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
9.
Pare, T. (1993). “A new tool for managing costs.”Fortune, June.
10.
Quillian, L. (1991). “Curing functional silo syndrome with logistics TCM.”Certified Management Accountant, June.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1998
Published in print: Mar 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.