Critical Communications Variables
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124, Issue 1
Abstract
Effective communications are essential to the successful completion of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) projects. Research from the Construction Industry Institute (CII) confirms this hypothesis. However, this finding would be of little benefit without a means for measuring a project's communications effectiveness. This paper documents the efforts of a CII research team in identifying and measuring critical communications variables during the execution phases of EPC projects. It confirms the common recognition of communication problems, provides insight into communications theory, and outlines procedures used by the research team throughout the study. Critical communications variables identified in the process are consolidated into six manageable categories establishing the basis for a communications improvement program. These categories in relative order of importance are accuracy, procedures, barriers, understanding, timeliness, and completeness. The paper concludes by acknowledging that this is the first step in solving project communications problems. To gain maximum benefit from this research, the categories and variables identified must be incorporated into an assessment tool and applied as part of a communications improvement program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ashley, D. B., Lurie, C. S., and Jaselskis, E. J.(1987). “Determinants of construction project success.”Proj. Mgmt. J., 18(2), 69–79.
2.
Cleland, D. I. (1995). “Professional development in the team-driven enterprise.”1995 Proc., Proj. Mgmt. Inst., Proj. Mgmt. Inst., Drexel Hill, Pa., 441–455.
3.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1986). Costs and benefits of materials management systems. Publication 7-1 (Nov.), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
4.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1987). Guidelines for implementing a constructability program. Publication 3-2 (July), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
5.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1992). An assessment of education and training needs among construction personnel. Special Publication 14-2 (April), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
6.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1993). Team building: improving project performance. Publication 37-1, (July), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
7.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1995). Electronic CII documents. ELCIID (Nov.), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
8.
Flippo, E. B., and Munsinger, G. M. (1975). Management. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass.
9.
Gibson, G. E., and Hamilton, M. R. (1994). “Analysis of pre-project planning effort and success variables for capital facility projects.”Rep. Source Document 105, (Nov.), to the Constr. Industry Inst., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
10.
Gibson, G. E., Tortora, A. L., and Wilson, C. T. (1994). “Perceptions of project representatives concerning project success and pre-project planning effort.”Rep. Source Document 102, (Sept.), to the Constr. Industry Inst., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
11.
Gibson, J. W., and Hodgetts, R. M. (1990). Business communications. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., New York, N.Y.
12.
Knoke, D., and Bohrnstedt, G. (1994). Statistics for social data analysis, 3rd Ed., F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., Itasca, Ill.
13.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1980). Applied regression. Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, Calif.
14.
Loo, R. (1995). “Effective interpersonal communications in project environments.”1995 Proc., Proj. Mgmt. Inst., Proj. Mgmt. Inst., Drexel Hill, Pa., 508–512.
15.
Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for windows, base system user's guide, release 6.0, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Inc., Chicago, Ill.
16.
Peters, T. J., and Waterman Jr., R. H. (1982). In search of excellence, lessons from America's best-run companies, Warner Books Inc., New York, N.Y.
17.
Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M., and Coyle, M.(1992). “Critical success factors for construction projects.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(1), 94–111.
18.
Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr., Hunt, J. G., and Osborn, R. N. (1994). Managing organizational behavior. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
19.
Sigband, N. B., and Bell, A. H. (1989). Communication for management and business, 5th Ed., Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, Ill.
20.
Thamhain, H. J. (1992). Engineering management, managing effectively in technology-based organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
21.
Thamhain, H. J., and Wilemon, D. L. (1986). “Criteria for controlling projects according to plan,”Proj. Mgmt. J., XVII(2), 75–81.
22.
Tucker, R. L., Kelly, W. R., and Thomas, S. R. (1996). “An assessment tool for improving project team communications.”Rep. Source Document 105-11, to the Constr. Industry Inst., The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
23.
Wofford, J. C., Gerloff, E. A., and Cummins, R. C. (1977). Organizational communication, the keystone to managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124 • Issue 1 • January 1998
Pages: 58 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1998
Published in print: Jan 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.