Planned Schedule Compression Concept File For Electrical Contractors
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 123, Issue 2
Abstract
Planned schedule compression can be thought of as a reduction of the normal experienced time or optimal time for the type and size project being considered. In contrast to other forms of schedule compression, planned schedule compression is anticipated and provisions are made before the start of the construction phase of the project. This paper presents the development of the planned schedule compression concept file for electrical contractors. Each concept attempts to provide a significant, distinct, and executable objective for enhancing the construction process and minimizing the impacts of schedule compression. Twenty-nine different concepts are presented, categorically subdivided into seven sections including the organization, materials, equipment and tools, information, labor, support services, and construction methods. Each of these concepts can be effectively used during planned schedule compression situations. Seven concepts, one each involving employee incentives, material handling, vendor performance, equipment and tools, constructability, setup crews, and construction methods, have been selected from the concept file and are presented in their entirety.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Advisory Service for the Building Industry. (1969). “The principles of incentives for the construction industry.” London, England.
2.
Bell, L. C., and Stukhart, G.(1987). “Cost and benefits of materials management systems.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(2), 222–233.
3.
Borcherding, J. D., and Sebastian, S. J. (1980). “Major factors influencing craft productivity in nuclear power plant construction.”Trans., Am. Assn. of Cost Engr., AACE, Morgantown, W. Va.
4.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1990). “Concepts and methods of schedule compression.”Source Document 55, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
5.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). “Constructability implementation guide.” (1993). Spec. Publ. 34-1, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
6.
Coskunoglu, O.(1984). “Optimal probabilistic compression of PERT networks.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(4), 437–446.
7.
Entwistle, A., and Reiners, W. J. (1958). “Incentives in the building industry.”Spec. Rep. No. 28, Nat. Build. Study, H. M. Stationery Ofc., London, England.
8.
Great Britain Department of the Environment (DOE). (1974). “Incentive schemes for small builders.” H. M. Stationery Ofc., London, England.
9.
Heather, P. R. (1989). “Mathews curve—a model for evaluating impact.”Trans. Am. Assn. of Cost Engrs., AACE, Morgantown, W. Va., I.4.1–I.4.6.
10.
Laufer, A., and Borcherding, J. D.(1981). “Financial incentives to raise productivity.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 745–757.
11.
Laufer, A., and Cohenca, D.(1990). “Factors affecting construction—planning outcomes.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 116(1), 135–156.
12.
Laufer, A., and Moore, B. E.(1983). “Attitudes towards productivity pay programs.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(1), 89–101.
13.
Marriott, R. (1961). Incentive payment systems, Staples, London, England.
14.
Moselhi, O.(1993). “Schedule compression using the direct stiffness method.”Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 20, 65–72.
15.
Muehlhausen, F. B. (1991). “Construction site utilization: impact of material movement and storage on productivity and cost.”Trans., Am. Assn. of Cost Engrs., AACE, Morgantown, W. Va., L.2.1–L.2.9.
16.
Noyce, D. A. (1995). “The impacts of planned and unplanned schedule compression or acceleration on the labor productivity of contractors,” MS thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis.
17.
O'Connor, J. T., Rusch, S. E., and Schulz, M. J.(1987). “Construction concepts for engineering and procurement.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(2), 235–248.
18.
Perera, S.(1980). “Linear programming solution to network compression.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 106(3), 315–326.
19.
Perera, S.(1982). “Compression of overlapping precedence networks.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(1), 1–11.
20.
Ritchie, E. (1985). “Network based planning techniques: a critical review of published development.”Further Developments in Operational Research, G. Rand and R. Eglese eds., Pergamon Press Inc., Oxford, England.
21.
Ritchie, E.(1990). “Project compression: a method for speeding up resource constrained projects which preserve the activity schedule.”Eur. J. Operational Res., Montrouge, France, 49(1), 140.
22.
Senouci, A. B., and Hanna, A. S.(1995). “Scheduling of nonserial linear projects with multiple non-overlapping loop structures.”Civ. Engrg. Sys., 11, 1–17.
23.
Thomas H. R., Sanvido, and V. R., and Sanders(1989). “Impact of material management on productivity.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(3), 370–384.
24.
Vrat, P., and Kriengkrairut, C. (1986). “A goal programming model for project crashing with piecewise linear time-cost trade-off.”Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Vol. 10, 161–172.
25.
Yau, C., and Ritchie, E.(1990). “Project compression: a method for speeding up resource constrained projects which preserve the activity schedule.”Eur. J. Operational Res., 49, 140–152.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 123 • Issue 2 • June 1997
Pages: 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1997
Published in print: Jun 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.