Electrical Construction Foreman Task Scheduling
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
The short-term task scheduling of electrical foremen working in commercial and institutional construction projects was evaluated using a combination of interviews, questionnaires, and field observations. The planning environment was evaluated qualitatively, including the project and firm size, availability of resources, planning horizon, and issuing of directives. The quantitative analysis of factors presumed to affect the scheduling was emphasized in the investigation. These factors included task duration, criticality, likelihood of problems during execution, actual problems, and offset in planned start. This investigation found that foremen had almost complete authority over their daily crew task assignments. The favored planning span to articulate an explicit schedule was the workweek. Labor availability was more constraining than material supply in the formulation of the schedule. Directives were verbally issued in all observed cases. Analysis of scheduling parameters showed that dependence on other subcontractors' progress was the most common source of problems, and that problems acted as uniform background noise in the scheduling accuracy. Short and near tasks were the easiest to schedule. Some tasks were categorized as “fillers,” used to achieve continuity in labor utilization.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ballard, G. (1994). “The last planner.” Presentation to the Northern California Construction Institute, Monterey, Calif.
2.
Ballard, G., Howell, G., and Kartam, S. (1994). “Redesigning job site planning systems.”Proc., 1st Congr. on Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1564–1574.
3.
Borcherding, D. J.(1977). “What is the construction foreman really like?”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 103(1), 71–85.
4.
Chang, L. M., and Borcherding, J. D.(1985). “Evaluation of craftsman questionnaire.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(4), 561–579.
5.
Cohenca-Zall, D., Laufer, A., Shapira, A., and Howell, G.(1994). “Process of planning during construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(3), 561–579.
6.
Cullen, J. D., and Nankervis, C. W.(1985). “Overcoming the Luddite factor: some behavioural aspects of the field supervisor's role in construction planning.”Int. J. Proj. Mgmt., 3(3), 133–140.
7.
Hinze, J., and Kuechenmeister, K.(1981). “Productive foremen characteristics.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 627–639.
8.
Hinze, J., and Tracey, A.(1994). “The contractor-subcontractor relationship: the subcontractor's view.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(2), 274–287.
9.
Howell, G.(1981). “Construction manager's distance from field work hampers productivity.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 51(5), 34–35.
10.
Howell, G., and Ballard, G. (1995). “Lean production theory: moving beyond `can do.”' Conf. on Lean Constr., Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
11.
Laufer, A., and Shohet, I.(1991). “Span of control of construction foreman: situational analysis.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(1), 90–105.
12.
Laufer, A., and Tucker, R. L.(1987). “Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process.”Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 5(3), 243–266.
13.
Laufer, A., Howell, G., and Rosenfeld, Y.(1992). “Three modes of short-term construction planning.”Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 10(3), 249–262.
14.
Laufer, A., Shapira, A., Cohenca-Zall, D., and Howell, G.(1993). “Prebid and preconstruction planning process.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(3), 426–444.
15.
Lemna, G., Borcherding, J., and Tucker, R.(1986). “Productive foremen in industrial construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 192–210.
16.
Levine, H. A. (1994). “Resource leveling and roulette: games of chance, part 2.”PMNetwork, VIII(7), 23–25.
17.
Mahoney, W. F., and McFillen, J. M.(1987). “Influence of foremen on performance.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(3), 399–415.
18.
Mathews, M. (1994). “Resource scheduling: incorporating capacity into schedule construction.”Proj. Mgmt. J., XXV(2), 44–54.
19.
Shapira, A., and Laufer, A.(1993). “Evolution of involvement and effort in project planning throughout project life.”Int. J. Proj. Mgmt., 11(3), 155–163.
20.
Shohet, I. M., and Laufer, A.(1991). “What does the construction foreman do?”Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 9(6), 565–576.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 122 • Issue 4 • December 1996
Pages: 363 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.