Patterns of Construction-Space Use in Multistory Buildings
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 121, Issue 4
Abstract
This research presents a construction-space model that defines a collection of descriptive space types and typical patterns of space use in multistory building construction. Recent space-planning research describes characteristics of space and provides simple models of space demand for construction work to support automated space-planning methods. These simplified models cannot accurately represent the space needed for complex networks of work and material-handling activities in multistory buildings. The construction-space model identifies 12 construction-activity space uses, and their typical patterns. Repeatable patterns of space needs are recognizable and often occur independently in core, floor area, and perimeter work zones. The construction-space model characterizes these space needs to predict space demand, and thus supports the logical planning of productive work sequences. Through case-study research and site observation, the space model was found to accurately represent the use of space by construction activities in multistory building construction. If applied on site, this research helps construction managers plan and manage space.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Howell, G., Laufer, A., and Ballard, G.(1993). “Interaction between subcycles: one key to improved methods.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(4), 714–728.
2.
Parvis, R. F. (1980). “Analysis of workspace congestion from scheduling data.”Trans. AACE, F4.
3.
Riley, D. R. (1994). “Modeling the space behavior of construction activities,” PhD thesis, Penn State Univ., Univ. Park, Pa.
4.
Smith, D. M. (1987). “An investigation of the space constraint problem in construction planning,” MSc thesis, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
5.
Thabet, W. (1992). “A space constrained resource constrained schedule system for multi-story buildings,” PhD thesis, Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
6.
Thomas, H. R. (1990). “Loss of construction labor productivity due to inefficiencies and disruptions: the weight of an expert opinion,”Rep., Pennsylvania Transp. Inst., Penn State Univ., Univ. Park, Pa., 91–98.
7.
Tommelein, I. D., Castillo, J. G., and Zouein, P. P. (1992). “Space-time characterization for resource management on construction sites.”Proc., 8th Conf. on Computing in Civ. Engrg., 623–630.
8.
Tommelein, I. D., and Zouein, P. P. (1992). “Activity-level space scheduling.”Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., 947–954.
9.
Zouein, P. P., and Tommelein, I. D. (1993). “Space schedule construction.”Computing in civil and building engineering, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1770–1777.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 121 • Issue 4 • December 1995
Pages: 464 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1995
Published in print: Dec 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.