Debt Capacity and Optimal Capital Structure for Privately Financed Infrastructure Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 121, Issue 4
Abstract
Concession agreements can be used by governments to induce the private sector to develop and operate many types of infrastructure projects. Under this type of arrangement, several private-sector companies join forces, become project promoters, and form a separate company that becomes responsible for financing, building, and operating the facility. Before this company can be formed, prospective promoters must determine how to fund the associated construction and startup costs. They must decide how much to borrow, how much to infuse from their own funds, and how much to raise from outside investors. Typically, such projects must repay any debt obligations through their own net operating income, and do not provide the lenders with any other collateral (off-balance-sheet financing). Thus, the possibility of a costly bankruptcy becomes much more likely. In this paper, we show that under these circumstances the amount of debt that a project can accommodate (its debt capacity) is less than 100% debt financing. The amount of debt that maximizes the investors' return on equity is less than the project's debt capacity, and the amount of debt that maximizes the project's net present value is even smaller. Exceeding these debt amounts and moving towards debt capacity should be avoided because it can rapidly erode the project's value to the investors. An example illustrates these concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aschauer, D. A.(1991). “Infrastructure: America's third deficit.”Challenge, 34, 39–45.
2.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
3.
Brealey, R. A., and Myers, S. C. (1991). Principles of corporate finance, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
4.
Copeland, T. E., and Weston, J. F. (1988). Financial theory and corporate policy . Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.
5.
Dias, A. (1994). “A managerial and financial study on the involvement of private-sector companies in the development, construction, operation and ownership of infrastructure projects,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
6.
Hamada, R. S.(1971). “Investment decision with a general equilibrium mean-variance approach.”Quarterly J. Economics, 85(4), 667–684.
7.
Hong, H., and Happort, A.(1978). “Debt capacity, optimal capital structure, and capital budgeting analysis.”Financial Mgmt., 7(3), 7–11.
8.
Kim, E. H.(1978). “A mean-variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate debt capacity.”J. Finance, 33(1), 45–63.
9.
Lintner, J.(1965). “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets.”Rev. of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
10.
Martin, J. D., and Scott, D. F.(1976). “Debt capacity and the capital budgeting decision.”Financial Mgmt., 5(2), 7–14.
11.
Mossin, J.(1966). “Equilibrium in a capital asset market.”Econometrica, 34, 768–783.
12.
Sharpe, W. F.(1964). “Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.”J. Finance, 19, 425–442.
13.
Van Horne, J. C. (1986). Financial management and policy . Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
14.
Winkler, R. L., Roodman, G. M., and Britney, R. R.(1972). “The determination of partial moments.”Mgmt. Sci., 19(3), 290–296.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1995
Published in print: Dec 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.