Fitting Beta Distributions Based on Sample Data
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
Construction operations are subject to a wide variety of fluctuations and interruptions. Varying weather conditions, learning development on repetitive operations, equipment breakdowns, management interference, and other external factors may impact the production process in construction. As a result of such interferences, the behavior of construction processes becomes subject to random variations. This necessitates modeling construction operations as random processes during simulation. Random processes in simulation include activity and processing times, arrival processes (e.g. weather patterns) and disruptions. In the context of construction simulation studies, modeling a random input process is usually performed by selecting and fitting a sufficiently flexible probability distribution to that process based on sample data. To fit a generalized beta distribution in this context, a computer program founded upon several fast, robust numerical procedures based on a number of statistical‐estimation methods is presented. In particular, the following methods were derived and implemented: moment matching, maximum likelihood, and least‐square minimization. It was found that the least‐square minimization method provided better quality fits in general, compared to the other two approaches. The adopted fitting procedures have been implemented in BetaFit, an interactive, microcomputer‐based software package, which is in the public domain. The operation of BetaFit is discussed, and some applications of this package to the simulation of construction projects are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AbouRizk, S. M. (1990). “Input modeling for construction simulation,” PhD thesis, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
2.
AbouRizk, S., and Halpin, D. (1992a). “Statistical properties of construction duration data.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(3), 525–544.
3.
AbouRizk, S., and Halpin, D. (1992b). “Modeling input data for construction simulation.” Proc., 8th Annu. Conf. on Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1147–1154.
4.
AbouRizk, S., Halpin, D., and Wilson, J. (1992). “Visual interactive estimation of beta distributions.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(4), 589–605.
5.
Al‐Masri, F. M. (1985). Analysis of a loader‐truck system operation using the computer simulation language SIMAN. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
6.
Beckman, R. J., and Tietjen, G. L. (1978). “Maximum likelihood estimation for the beta distribution.” J. Statist. Comput. Simul., 7, 253–258.
7.
Farid, F., and Aziz, T. (1993). “Simulating paving fleets with non‐stationary travel.” 5th Int. Conf. on Comp. in Civ. and Build. Engrg., 1198–1206.
8.
Griffiths, P., and Hill, I. D. (1985). Applied statistics algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
9.
Hahn, G. J., and Shapiro, S. S. (1967). Statistical models in engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
10.
Halpin, D. W. (1990). MicorCYCLONE user's manual. Division of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
11.
Johnson, N. L. (1948). “System of frequency curves generated by methods of translation.” Biometrica, 36, 149–176.
12.
Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. (1970). Continuous univariate distributions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
13.
Olsson, D. M. (1974). “A sequential simplex program for solving minimization problems.” J. Quality Technol., 6, 53–57.
14.
Pike, M. C., and Hill, I. D. (1964). “Algorithm 291.” Comm. ACM, 9, 684.
15.
Ramberg, J. S.Tadikamalla, P. R., Dudewicz, E. J., and Mykytka, E. F. (1979). “A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data.” Technometrics, 21, 201–214.
16.
Riggs, L. S. (1989). “Numerical approach for generating beta random variables.” J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 3(2), 183–191.
17.
Schmeiser, B. W., and Deutsh, S. J. (1976). “A versatile four parameter family of probability distributions suitable for simulation.” AIIE Trans., 9(2), 176–181.
18.
Swain, J., Venkatraman, S., and Wilson, J. (1988). “Least squares estimation of distribution functions in Johnson's translation system.” J. Statist. Comput. Simul., 29, 271–297.
19.
Touran, A., and Wiser, E. (1992). “Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(2), 258–272.
20.
Tukey, J. W. (1960). “The practical relationship between the common transformations of percentages of counts and of amounts.” Tech. Rep. No. 36. Statistical Techniques Research Group, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
21.
Wilson, J. (1983). “Modeling multivariate populations with Johnson translation systems.” Tech. Rep., Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 2 • June 1994
Pages: 288 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 23, 1993
Published online: Jun 1, 1994
Published in print: Jun 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.