DBID: Analogy‐Based DSS for Bidding in Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 119, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents a decision‐support system (DSS) that aids contractors in preparing competitive bids for building projects. The DSS uses neural networks for markup estimation that derive solutions for new bid situations based on analogy with past projects using information elicited from contractors in Canada and the United States. The neural networks were trained to generalize the projects' knowledge and thus become able to predict the outcomes of a project when fed with the contractor's assessment of various project risks. The proposed DSS is coded in a user‐friendly software called DBID. The software enables the contractor to retrain the neural networks on some of his or her past bid encounters and accordingly adapt the model to his or her own environment. In estimating the optimum markup for a new project, the uncertainty in the contractor's assessment of project risks is accounted for by a sensitivity analysis conducted using the Monte Carlo simulation technique. Such analysis produces a measure of the probability of winning at any desired level of markup. The capabilities of the present DSS are demonstrated through an example application.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ahmad, I. (1990). “Decision‐support system for modeling bid/no‐bid decision problem.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 116(4), 595–608.
2.
Ahmad, I., and Minkarah, I. (1987). “An additive utility model for selecting optimum bid price.” Proc., 18th Ann. Pittsburgh Conf. on Modeling and Simulation, Pittsburgh, Pa., 18(1), 367–373.
3.
Ahmad, I., and Minkarah, I. (1988a). “An expert system for selecting bid markups.” Proc., 5th Conf. on Computers in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 229–238.
4.
Ahmad, I., and Minkarah, I. (1988b). “Questionnaire survey on bidding in construction.” J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 4(3), 229–243.
5.
Birnie, J., and Yates, A. (1991). “Cost prediction using decision/risk analysis methodologies.” Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, Vol. 9, 171–186.
6.
Bishop, J., Bushnell, M., Usher, A., and Westland, S. (1991). “Neural networks in the colour industry.” Applications of AI in Engrg. VI, G. Rzevski and R. A. Adey, eds., Elsevier Applied Science, New York, N.Y., 423–434.
7.
Carr, R. I. (1987). “Optimum markup by direct solution.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 113(1), 138–150.
8.
Carr, R. I. (1982). “General bidding model.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(4), 639–650.
9.
Caudill, M. (1991). “Evolutionary Neural Networks.” AI Expert, (Mar.), 28–33.
10.
Caudill, M., and Butler, C. (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
11.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Operations Res., 4, 104–112.
12.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 93(1), 75–107.
13.
Moselhi, O. and Hegazy, T. (1992). “Discussion of ‘Bidding Strategy: Winning Over Key Competitors.’” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 118(1), 151–165.
14.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy, T., and Fazio, P. (1992). “Potential applications of neural networks in construction.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 19, 521–529.
15.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy T., and Fazio, P. (1991). “Neural networks as tools in construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 117(4), 606–625.
16.
de Neufville, R., and King, D. (1991). “Risk and need‐for‐work premiums in contractor bidding.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 117(4), 659–673.
17.
Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., and Williams, R. (1986). “Learning internal representations by error propagation.” Parallel distributed processing, D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McLelland, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
18.
Seydel, J., and Olson, D. (1990). “Bids considering multiple criteria.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 116(4), 609–623.
19.
Tavakoli, A., and Utomo, J. (1989). “Bid markup assistant: an expert system.” Cost Engrg. J., 31(6), 28–33.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 119 • Issue 3 • September 1993
Pages: 466 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 1992
Published online: Sep 1, 1993
Published in print: Sep 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.