Quantitative Study of Contractor Evaluation Programs and Their Impact
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 118, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper's dual intent is to assist contract administrators in better understanding the impact of contractor failure and to aid them in establishing adequate evaluation programs prior to contract award using quantitative data. Failure is defined in this study as a significant breach of the contractor's legal responsibilities to the owner (for example, bankruptcy or material breach of contract related to meeting the desired project objectives such as cost, schedule, and quality). This study quantitatively documents both the amount of owner evaluation performed prior to contract award and subsequent monitoring during the construction process and correlates these efforts with the actual project outcome, either failure or nonfailure. A survey used to collect data prompted responses from 82 different organizations representing both public and private owner concerns; they provided information for a total of 107 projects. Of these, 44 involved a contractor failure. Results demonstrated a significant increase in final project cost and schedule duration as a result of the contractor's failure. The practical considerations regarding contractor failure are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Jaselskis, E. J., and Ashley, D. B. (1991). “Optimal allocation of project management resources for achieving success.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(2), 321–340.
2.
Mendenhall, W., and Reinmuth, J. E. (1982). Statistics for management and economics, 4th Ed., Duxbury Press, Boston, Mass.
3.
Russell, J. S. (1991a). “Contractor failure: Analysis.” J. Performance of Constr. Fac., 5(3), 163–180.
4.
Russell, J. S. (1991b). “Construction contract bonds.” J. Mgmt. in Engrg., 7(3), 299–313.
5.
Russell, J. S., and Radtke, M. W. (1991). “Subcontractor failure: Case history.” Proc. 35th Annual Conf., B. Humphreys, S. Pritchart, and K. K. Humphreys, eds., American Association of Cost Engineers (AACE), Morgantown, W.Va., E.2.1–E.2.6.
6.
“Use of surety bonds in federal construction should be improved.” (1975). Report to the Congress by the Comptroller General of the United States, Government Accounting Office, (GAO), Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1992
Published in print: Sep 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.