R&D Cooperation by Swedish Contractors
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 118, Issue 1
Abstract
A survey of technical and administrative research and development (R&D) performed by Swedish contractors indicates that total R&D in 1989 reached 1.6% of total value added. Large firms in the industry show higher R&D intensities. Reasons for undertaking development work and preferred patterns of collaboration are ranked by eleven contractors in the survey. Increasing competitive power is the main reason given, regardless of firm size. Contractors also agree on the importance of owners as partners in development projects. Given this background, experiences from the first seven years of the joint employer and union Development Fund of the Swedish Construction Industry (SBUF) are reported. Data on all 264 finished projects, their applicants, participants, and themes are analyzed. Rising educational levels, structural change in the industry, and applications of advanced technology, including information technology, appear as long‐term trends that affect the future of contractor R&D in Sweden.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bröchner, J., Gustafsson, G., and Rahm, H. G. (1989). “Development projects with support from SBUF [Utvecklingsprojekt med bidrag från SBUF]” (in Swedish). Report No. TRITA‐BBO‐024, Dept. of Bldg. Econ. & Org., Royal Inst. of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
2.
Bröchner, J., Larsson, B., and Zingmark, A. (1990). Development work in construction firms: a pilot study [Utvecklingsarbete i entreprenadföretag] (in Swedish). The Development Fund of the Swedish Construction Industry, SBUF, Stockholm, Sweden.
3.
Fredriksson, G., and Larsson, B., (1984). “Adoption of new technology in the construction firm.” Proc., CIB W‐65 4th Int. Symp. on Organization Mgmt. of Constr., V. K. Handa, ed., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, Vol. 3, 939–950.
4.
Fredriksson, G., and Lundmark, L. O. (1980). “A national housing programme as a stimulus to development in building production.” Bulletin No. M80:6, The National Swedish Inst. for Bldg. Research, Gävle, Sweden.
5.
Habermeier, K. F. (1990). “Product use and product improvement.” Res. Policy, 19(3), 271–283.
6.
Hisatomi, Y. (1990). “An introduction to the Japanese construction industry and general contractors” Proc., CIB 90 Building Economics and Constr. Mgmt., Univ. of Technology, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 3, 247–255.
7.
Jacobsson, M. (1955). The Three‐city houses: Construction costs and work organization in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö [Trestadshusen: byggkostnader och arbetsorganisation i Stockholm, Göteborg och Malmö] (in Swedish). Kungl. Bostadsstyrelsen, Sweden.
8.
Kleinknecht, A. (1987). “Measuring R&D in small firms: How much are we missing?” J. Ind. Econ., 36(2), 253–256.
9.
Murillo, J. A. (1988). “Modern bridge construction and engineering services.” Managing innovation: Cases from the services industries, B. R. Guile and J. B. Quinn, eds., National Academy of Engrg., Washington, D.C., 165–174.
10.
Nam, C. H., and Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Toward understanding of product innovation process in construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 115(4), 517–534.
11.
The new building market. (1969). The Swedish Industries' Building Study Group, Stockholm, Sweden.
12.
Pavitt, K. (1984). “Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory.” Res. Policy, 13(6), 343–374.
13.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
14.
R&D of the construction sector [Byggesektorens F&U] (in Danish). (1990). Danish Association of Consulting Engineers, F.R.I. Copenhagen, Denmark.
15.
“Research and development in technology and natural sciences in business enterprise sector.” (1989) Statistical Reports U 14 SM 8901, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
16.
Swedish construction under international competition [Svenskt byggande i internationell konkurrens] (in Swedish). (1984). The Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
17.
Tatum, C. B. (1987). “Process of innovation in construction firm.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 648–663.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 118 • Issue 1 • March 1992
Pages: 3 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1992
Published in print: Mar 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.