Framework for Analysis of Performance
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 116, Issue 3
Abstract
The construction process involves the interaction of equipment, manpower, and material. Each construction project begins with performance goals for cost, schedule, safety, etc. When actual performance differs from exected performance, the cause of the deviation must be determined. The analysis of construction performance has typically been performed in a shotgun fashion. The paper presents a framework for the rationalization of the analysis of construction performance that will improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the analysis. The framework provides a decision tree that will guide construction engineers as they analyze performance. Five major issues are addressed in the framework: adequacy of actual performance; presence of organizationally imposed constraints; worker possession of required knowledge, skills, and ability; worker possession of necessary motivation; and whether the estimate is realistic. Use of the framework requires answering a series of questions. Data are suggested to allow the questions to be answered.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
2.
Maloney, W. F. (1983). “Productivity improvement: The influence of labor.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(3), 321–334.
3.
Maloney, W. F., and McFillen, J. M. (1983). “Research heeds in construction worker performance.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(2), 245–254.
4.
Maloney, W. F., and McFillen, J. M. (1986). “Motivation in unionized construction.” J. Constr. Engrg., and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(1), 122–136.
5.
Sink, D. (1985). Productivity management: Planning, measurement and evaluation, control and improvement. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
6.
Thomas, H. R., Jr. (1981). Construction work sampling. Department of Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
7.
Thomas, H. R., and Kramer, D. F. (1989). The manual of construction productivity and measurement. Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
8.
Tucker, R. L., et al. (1982). “Implementation of foreman delay surveys.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(4), 577–591.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1990
Published in print: Sep 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.