Dilemmas Facing Construction Education and Research in 1990s
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 116, Issue 1
Abstract
Construction, seen as a discipline calling for higher education and research, is a relatively new phenomenon that has come into being largely since World War II. As such, it is having growing pains and, with them, differences in practices and opinions on the paths to be followed. Until 40 years ago, the managers directing the actual on‐site construction were predominantly ambitious, hard‐driving craftsmen who had come up through the trades. Their knowledge was gained by “doing.” There was little university or industry interest in college‐level education for construction managers, nor technical literature nor research to support it. Since that time, some 150 college‐level educational programs for construction have evolved. Currently, these follow four tracks: two programs are undergraduate and one is graduate‐level, based in civil engineering; the fourth track, primarily undergraduate, rests in numerous other university departments. Research is primarily found in schools following the graduate track. Each of these tracks has its own curriculum, constituency, and supporters among educators and in industry. The dilemma facing both the construction industry and the individual academic institutions is how to develop the interest and support necessary so that the universities can better serve both the construction industry and the owners for which it builds.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Dietz, A. G. H., and Little, W. A. (1976). “Education for construction.” J. Const. Div., ASCE, 102(2), 347–364.
2.
Dorsey, R. W. (1987). “Construction, the emerging discipline.” AIC Professional Constructor, 3–5.
3.
ENR. (1988). Aug. 11, 8–9.
4.
Klinger, W. A. (1955). The constructor. 70.
5.
Ledbetter, B. S. (1985). “Pioneering construction engineering education.” J. Const. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(1), 41–52.
6.
Oberlender, G. D., and Hughes, R. K. (1987). “Graduate construction programs in the United States.” J. Const. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(1), 17–26.
7.
Oberlender, G. D. (1984). “Development of construction research.” J. Const. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(4), 486–489.
8.
Oglesby, C. H. (1982). “Construction education: Past, present, and future.” J. Const. Div., ASCE, 108(4), 605–616.
9.
Oglesby, C. H., Parker, H., and Howell, G. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
10.
Paulson, B. C. (1980). “Research in the Japanese construction industry.” J. Const. Div., ASCE, 105(1), 1–16.
11.
Paulson, B. C., and Aki, T. (1980). “Construction management in Japan.” J. Const. Div., ASCE, 106(3), 281–296.
12.
Ramo, S. (1988). The business of science. Hill and Wang, New York, N.Y.
13.
Tucker, R. L. (1988a). “CII memorandum to R. A. Valentine.”
14.
Tucker, R. L. (1988b). “Perfection of the Buggy Whip,” J. Const. Engrg. and Mgmt., 114(2), 157–171.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1990
Published in print: Mar 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.