Impact of Material Management on Productivity—A Case Study
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 115, Issue 3
Abstract
Recent CII research has indicated that formal material management programs have the potential to yield significant construction cost savings, yet small‐ and medium‐sized commercial contractors may not feel that an integrated material management program is cost effective. The objective of this paper is to quantify the adverse impacts of ineffective material management practices. Data collected as part of an ongoing construction productivity study is used to analyze and compare the effects of material management practices on two steel erection projects. Rules of credit were applied to calculate the daily output. Adverse conditions caused by the lack of an effective material management program are identified, and the days on which the conditions occurred are noted. For these days, the actual daily productivity is compared with the expected productivity to determine the number of work‐hours lost. The cost impact is compared to the cost of effective material management. The results show a benefits/cost ratio of 5.7, favoring greater attention to material management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Construction productivity measurement. (1982). Report No. A‐1, The Business Roundtable, (BRT) New York, N.Y.
2.
Cost and benefits of material management systems. (1986). Publication 7‐1, The Construction Industry Institute (CII), Austin, Tex.
3.
O'Connor, L. V. (1967). “Overcoming the problems of scheduling on large central stations boilers.” Proceedings of the American Power Conference, 31, 518–528.
4.
Project control for construction. (1987). Publication 6‐5, The Construction Industry Institute (CII), Austin, Tex.
5.
Tatum, C. B. (1985). “Evaluating construction progress.” Proj. Mgmt. J., 16(3), 52–57.
6.
Thomas, H. R., Mathews, C. T., and Ward, J. G. (1986). “Learning curve models of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 245–258.
7.
Thomas, H. R., and Mannering, F. L. (1986). “Development of the framework for a labor‐intensive construction site forecasting model.” Research project sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. MSM‐8611600.
8.
Thomas, H. R., and Yiakoumis, I. (1987). “The factor model of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 623–639.
9.
Thomas, H. R., and Kramer, D. F. (1987). “The manual of construction productivity measurement and performance evaluation.” Report submitted to the Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
10.
Thomas, H. R., Sanders, S. R., and Horner, R. M. W. (1987) “Procedures manual for collecting productivity and related data of labor‐intensive activities on commercial construction projects.” The Pennsylvania State University, Revision 2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 115 • Issue 3 • September 1989
Pages: 370 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1989
Published in print: Sep 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.