Methods to Identify and Assess New Building Technology
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114, Issue 3
Abstract
The lack of a coordinated industry‐wide effort to provide the emerging construction technological information is one of the reasons behind the slow adoption of new technologies in the U.S. construction industry. This paper reports the results of a research project on this critical issue. The purpose of the research was to develop a formalized mechanism to identify new building technologies available for use by the construction industry and to assess the potential impact of the identified new technologies on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers construction program. There are many means to identify new building technologies. Information can be obtained through periodical search, code organizations, testing laboratories, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Department, advertising in trade magazines, and interviewing experts. The impact of each identified technology on the corps' construction programs was assessed in terms of the corps' five‐year plans, the Means and Dodge manuals, and building systems affected by the technology. Other assessed features were a cost benefit comparison and the risk associated to implement the technology. The findings of this research are encouraging. A generic framework has been developed, and the areas that need to be further improved have been pointed out.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Army regulation (AR) 415‐28. (1981). U.S. Army Facility Classes and Construction Categories, Washington, D.C., Nov.
2.
Cornelio, C. J., Goodrich, W. D., and Hawkins, S. (1987). “Management of innovation building systems technology.,” Report, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, Ill., Feb.
3.
Dodge construction systems costs. (1986). McGraw‐Hill Information Systems Co., Princeton, N.J.
4.
Kelly, H. (1986). “Technology and the construction industry.” Technology and the U.S. Construction Industry (Proc. Panel on Technical Change and the U.S. Building Construction Industry), Office of Technology Assessment, A1A Press, Washington, D.C., Mar., 1–10.
5.
Manual of classification. (1986). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C., Dec., 52‐1–52‐9.
6.
Means residential/light commercial cost data. (1986). Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Mass.
7.
Mean square foot costs—1985. (1985). Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Mass., 97.
8.
Technological progress in the construction industry. (1982). The Business Round‐table, New York, N.Y., 1–8.
9.
Tucker, R. C. (1986). “Construction technologies.” Technology and the U.S. Construction Industry (Proc. Panel on Technical Change and the U.S. Building Construction Industry), Office of Technology Assessment, A1A Press, Washington, D.C., Mar., 86–103.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114 • Issue 3 • March 1988
Pages: 408 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1988
Published in print: Mar 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.